Post-operative Pulmonary Function After Kidney Surgery Under Two Different Techniques

November 30, 2022 updated by: Khaled Abdelbaky Abdelrahman, Assiut University

Evaluation of Post-operative Pulmonary Function After Open Kidney Surgery: Comparison Between Thoracic Epidural and Paravertebral Block

To assess the respiratory and analgesic effects of continuous thoracic paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural in patients undergoing kidney surgery

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study tools

  • An Ultrasound machine (Madison X6) with superficial linear and curved probe.
  • A 19 gauge echogenic needle and Plexolong Cather (PAJUNK, Plexolong Meier nanoline, Geisingen, Germany; 60 mm).
  • A 17-gauge Tuohy needle and 19 G flex-tip catheter: for thoracic epidural.
  • Spirometer: (Enraf-Nonius, Model SPIRO 601).
  • Drugs: isobaric bupivacaine 0.25% (aside from the drugs used in the standard operation theatre).
  • Computer software: computer generated random tables (for randomization) and SPSS 22 (for data analysis)

Thoracic epidural (TEP):

A pre-procedural ultrasound examination will be done to first identify the correct targeted thoracic level. To accomplish this, the transducer will be placed in the parasagittal plane approximately 5 cm from midline. The thoracic level will be determined by identifying the 12th rib and counting in a cephalad direction until the targeted level is marked.

All epidurals will be performed under all aseptic precautions with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle and 19 G flex-tip catheters. Using the loss of resistance to saline technique, catheters will be inserted 4 cm into the epidural space and a suitable test dose will be administered to exclude intravascular or sub-arachnoid injection

Bupivacaine 0.25% of 7.5-12 ml volume will be given through the epidural catheter then continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% will be infused at a rate of 5 ml/h up to 15 ml/h with bolus infusion of 5 to 10 ml of the infusion mixture for breakthrough pain. The block height will be tested using pin prick method. After spirometry testing and diaphragmatic ultrasound, the infusion of TEP will be gradually weaned of and the catheter will be removed under complete aseptic precautions.

Thoracic paravertebral block: (TPVB) The Ultrasound-probe will be centered on T7. The sagittal technique at the transverse process, in-plane, will be used. The 19 gauge echogenic needle will be inserted in-plane at the lower border of the transducer and advanced in a cephalad position with real-time ultrasound sonography.

Injection of small amounts of fluid (hydro-dissection) will aid in needle tip location. When the needle tip reaches the paravertebral space, 7.5-12 ml Bupivacaine 0.25% will be slowly injected after negative aspiration. The endpoint for a successful block is anterior displacement of the pleura. The catheter will be then inserted through the needle and positioned up to 3 cm from skin entry directing upwards in the paravertebral space then continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% will be infused at a rate of 5 ml/h up to 15 ml/h with bolus infusion of 5 to 10 ml of the infusion mixture for breakthrough pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71516
        • Assiut University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II, III
  • elective kidney surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal
  • contraindications to neuraxial blocks
  • pneumonectomy
  • planed postoperative mechanical ventilatoin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: thoracic epidural group
patients in this group will receive ultrasound guided thoracic epidural block preoperatively for pain management, continuous infusion of 0.5% bupivacaine through epidural catheter during operation and early post-operative period
thoracic epidural block with bupivacaine 0.25% will be given in the 8th thoracic space using ultrasound
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: paravertebral group
patients in this group will receive ultrasound guided pararvertebral block preoperatively for pain management, continuous infusion of paravertebral bupivacaine 0.5% through paravetebral catheter during operation and early post-operative period
paravertebral block with 0.25 bupivacaine will be given at the level of the incision using ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
vital capacity
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
measured by spirometer (Enraf-Nonius, Model SPIRO 601 medical Technologies)
24 hours after operation
forced vital capacity
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
measured by spirometer (Enraf-Nonius, Model SPIRO 601 medical Technologies)
24 hours after operation
forced expiratory volume in one second
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
measured by spirometer (Enraf-Nonius, Model SPIRO 601 medical Tecnologies)
24 hours after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain score
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
pain will be assessed using VAS score, it provides a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
24 hours after operation
diaphragmatic excursion
Time Frame: 24 hours after operation
ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic excursion
24 hours after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mohammed G Abdelraheem, MD, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 29, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • aunanesth202019

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Function

Clinical Trials on thoracic epidural block

3
Subscribe