Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa (Spices_phase_2)

March 15, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Scaling-up Packages of Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Selected Sites in Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa. SPICES Study Implementation Phase

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the world. 17.5 million people died in 2012 due to CVD (31% of all causes of death). In Europe more than 50% of deaths are due to CVD. The CVD mortality rate is higher in the lower socio-economic levels. Three quarters of CVD deaths occur in developing countries (LDCs). According to estimates in 2030, CVD will be responsible for more deaths than the sum of infectious, nutritional, maternal and perinatal diseases in developing countries. The lack of an adequate primary care network in developing countries limits the screening and treatment of people with CVRF. As a result, these people do not benefit from appropriate prevention, are diagnosed late and remain disabled or die at a young age, resulting in significant additional costs for families but also at the macroeconomic level.

Cardiovascular risk factor prevention measures (CVRF) have been shown to be effective. Interventions are possible on a large scale (policies against smoking and unfavorable eating habits, promoting physical activity, etc.). Actions are possible at the individual level, both in primary prevention (fight against the FDRCV) and secondary, where many treatments have proven their effectiveness. These interventions are effective and profitable from a macroeconomic point of view. It has been estimated that the cost for such interventions would not exceed 4% of health expenditure in developing countries and 1-2% in rich countries.

The World Health Organization (WHO) stresses the importance of the triad composed by the patient and his family, the community and health professionals. Results are possible only when these three components work together for the same purpose. Many studies show the benefit of people's involvement in care in rich and developing countries.

SPICES project builds on progress in HIV / AIDS treatment in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and chronic disease management through the Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions (ICCC Framework), WHO plan. With regard to HIV treatment, these interventions have proven to be effective and cost-effective in many SSA countries, both in terms of disease control and adherence. These data on communicable and infectious diseases seem to be transferable to non-communicable diseases.

These projects were born from the observation that the model of care of the rich countries (individual approach of the patient, centered on the hospital and the specialist with a regular clinical and paraclinical follow-up) could not be transposed to the developing countries, because the limitation of human, technical and financial resources. But also that this model was becoming more and more difficult to maintain in developed countries or resources become limited. New approaches need to be developed to increase the effectiveness of health systems.

A paradigm shift is needed to improve the control of CVD with greater cost-effectiveness.

The SPICES project incorporates the most up-to-date knowledge to improve the prevention and control of CVD in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

Rich countries and developing countries are therefore involved in the study. The selected sites are France, United Kingdom, Belgium, South Africa and Uganda.

Some main axes of the ICCC Framework will be developed in SPICES:

  • improve the efficiency of health professionals through the delegation of skills and appropriate training,
  • center care around the patient and his family and more generally his caregivers,
  • simplify the monitoring and treatment protocols,
  • support patients in their community and emphasize prevention, information and patient education.

A first step of observation in the various countries made it possible to make an inventory of fixtures and to target the most adapted interventions.

The following steps are the implementation of these interventions (delegation of skills, information campaign and screening, improve the availability of treatments, measure of strengthening of compliance, etc. ..) and their evaluation.

This study, carried out in France and integrated into the SPICES project, will test the best non-pharmacological interventions selected in the community and by the community.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

583

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • La Forest-Landerneau, France
        • LE GOFF
      • Lanmeur, France, 29260
        • LE RESTE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Within the general population, all persons over 18 years of age living or working in the country Center Bretagne (including Pays Pays Ouest Bretagne, Pleyben and Callac) with a moderate cardiovascular risk score based on the Interheart clinical risk score (score 9-15).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Age under 18 years old
  • Patient in secondary cardiovascular prevention
  • Nobody living or working in Central Brittany (Pays Center Ouest Bretagne and Pays de Pleyben and Callac)
  • Low (<9) or high cardiovascular risk score by Interheart score (> 15).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Only measurement of clinical endpoints at time zero, then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and minimal counseling.
Other: Interventional group
Measurement of clinical endpoints at time zero, then at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and minimal counseling followed by multi-behavioral intervention adapted to local resources.
The interventional group will then meet regularly under the aegis of the trainer to work on modifying each person's risk factors. The one-hour sessions will be scheduled every two weeks for two months and then every month for two months and then every three months until the end of the study (13 sessions). These sessions will be behavior change sessions, focused on goal setting, action planning, and problem solving. Trainers will facilitate these sessions and use motivational interviewing techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the non laboratory Interheart risk score
Time Frame: 24 months
Comparison of the Non Laboratory Interheart risk average score between the two arms at 24 months. This scale is used to predict incident cardiovascular disease.This score is summed and is calculated from questions about family history, type of diet and sports activities.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Quality of life evaluated by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL scale brief). This questionnaire contains two items from the Overall Quality of Life and General Health, and one item from each of the 24 facets included in The WHOQOL-100. It assesses the individual's perceptions in the context of their culture and value systems, and their personal goals, standards and concerns.The WHOQOL-BREF instrument comprises 26 items, which measure the following broad domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The score is summed.
24 months
BMI
Time Frame: 24 months
Reduction of BMI
24 months
Evaluation of the level of smoking
Time Frame: 24 months
Reduction of the number of smokers / reduction of the number of cigarettes per smoker
24 months
Improvement of the diet
Time Frame: 24 months
Improvement of the diet with the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Quality questionnaire (DASH-Q). This questionnaire was developed in 1997, emphasizing on 8 components: high consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy foods, legumes and nuts, and low intake of sodium, sweetened beverages, and red and processed meat. The total score is summed.
24 months
Level of physical activity
Time Frame: 24 months
Level of physical activity by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). This questionnaire comprises a set of 4 questionnaires. Long (5 activity domains asked independently) and short (4 generic items) versions for use by either telephone or self-administered methods are available. The purpose of the questionnaires is to provide common instruments that can be used to obtain internationally comparable data on health-related physical activity.The total score is summed.
24 months
Alcohol consumption
Time Frame: 24 months
Alcohol consumption by collecting the reported weekly consumption of alcohol
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 29BRC18.0256_Spices_phase_2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning five years and ending fifteen years following the final study report completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Clinical Trials on Multi-behavioral intervention

3
Subscribe