A 12-week Intervention With Motivational Interviewing and Physical Activity Monitoring, to Enhance the Daily Amount of Physical Activity in Community Dwelling Older Adults - a Randomized Controlled Trial (MIPAM)

October 7, 2020 updated by: Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen, University of Copenhagen

To investigate if motivational-interviewing will enhance the expected effect from physical activity monitors, on physical activity in older adults, we will conduct a two-arm randomized controlled trial in 2019.

Both groups in the trial will receive a physical activity monitor for everyday use in the 12-week intervention period and a folder with information about the benefits of physical activity in older age. Participants in the intervention group will in addition to the use of the physical activity monitors receive a motivational feedback session by phone of about 20 minutes constructed from the theoretical framework of Motivational interviewing by Rollnick, Miller & Butler and Social Cognitive Theory by Bandura. The content of the session focuses on investigating the most relevant possibilities and barriers for the participant to increase his or her levels of PA.

The primary outcome will be between group difference in average steps per day throughout the intervention period, measured objectively by the physical activity monitor (Garmin Vivofit 3). Secondary outcomes include participant reported outcome measures such as 'International Physical Activity Questionnaire', 'Nordic Physical Activity Questionnaire', 'EQ5D Quality of life questionnaire', 'UCLA Loneliness Scale', 'Self Efficacy for Exercise', and 'Outcome expectancy for Exercise'. To ensure 80% power with an alpha-level on 0.05, we will include 128 participants. The study will enroll in March 2019.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 1663
        • Rasmus Tolstrup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must:

  • Be minimum 70 years of age at the time of inclusion
  • Own and use an Apple/Google/Microsoft smartphone device compatible with the Garmin Connect™ Mobile application.
  • Own use an e-mail account
  • Live in Denmark and have a Danish postal address and be able to receive the intervention content.
  • Be able to walk independently with or without assistive devices.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants cannot

  • Receive active cancer treatment
  • Have major cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia or alzheimers).
  • Parkinson's or Multiple Sclerosis (or similar disease) affecting their mobility in such a way that the participants cannot walk on a daily basis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational interviewing
Experimental content + base intervention

During the 12-week intervention, the participants will receive seven telephone calls from a physical therapist. The interviews will be held in week 1, 2,3,5,7,9, and 12.

The telephone call will consist of a motivational interview focused on enhancing the daily level of physical activity in the participants.

MI is a form of counselling aiming at prompting increases in self-efficacy, which may leave people more open to and invested in changing their behaviours and shows potential for significant effects for exercise behaviour change.

In addition to the telephone based motivational interviews, the experimental group will also receive the "base intervention" which is described in detail under the "control intervention paragraph".

The "base intervention" consists of a physical activity monitor (PAM) for everyday use in the intervention period and a pamphlet with information about Danish recommendations on physical activity in aging populations. The PAM will be the Garmin Vivofit 3 monitor linked to a pre-specified Garmin Connect account. The participants will be asked to install the Garmin Connect application on their smartphone and use the given ID/password in the app. The participants will be asked to wear the monitor 24-hours a day for the 12-week intervention period. The participants can use the PAM as they like but they will be asked to try to use the PAM and the application to enhance their daily level of physical activity.
Active Comparator: Control intervention
Base intervention
The "base intervention" consists of a physical activity monitor (PAM) for everyday use in the intervention period and a pamphlet with information about Danish recommendations on physical activity in aging populations. The PAM will be the Garmin Vivofit 3 monitor linked to a pre-specified Garmin Connect account. The participants will be asked to install the Garmin Connect application on their smartphone and use the given ID/password in the app. The participants will be asked to wear the monitor 24-hours a day for the 12-week intervention period. The participants can use the PAM as they like but they will be asked to try to use the PAM and the application to enhance their daily level of physical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual intervention period average of PAM measured steps per day
Time Frame: A daily average of the 12 weeks of intervention
Daily step counts will be objectively measured by the PAM.
A daily average of the 12 weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: The seven-item IPAQ-SF measure assesses the types of intensity of physical activity and sitting time that people has done the past seven days as part of their daily lives are considered to estimate total physical activity in MET-min/week and time spent sitting.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Nordic Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: It is developed to monitor compliance with the WHO recommendations on PA.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
EQ5D Quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: The EQ-5D-5L is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure developed as a non-disease-specific instrument for describing and valuing health states and comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), each of which has three levels (no problems, moderate problems and extreme problems) and a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The score for the five dimensions can be combined into a five-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: The 20-item UCLA loneliness scale (third version) is a self-report measure of loneliness and social isolation. The scale consists of 11 positive and nine negative items and the total score is calculated by finding the sum of 20 items (0-60), with a higher score indicating more loneliness.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Self Efficacy for Exercise
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: The nine-item SEE-DK addresses confidence to engage in regular exercise [44], when challenged by known barriers to exercise. The scale was developed initially for sedentary adults in the community who participated in an outpatient exercise program and was revised to older adults. It is designed to be administered using face-to-face interview. Response categories range from 0 (no confidence) to 10 (very confident). Item scores are used to calculate a total score (0-90), with higher scores indicating higher confidence, or self-efficacy, related to exercise. The SEE-DK is adapted to Danish older adults with acceptable face and content validity, construct validity by acceptable model fit as a unidimensional scale, and test-retest reliability.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Outcome expectancy for Exercise
Time Frame: Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months
Questionnaire: The 13-item OEE-2 scale was developed from the original 9-item Outcome Expectations for Exercise scale (OEE) that specifically focused on measuring the positive outcome expectations for exercise (POEE). To complete the OEE2-DK scale the participants are asked, using a Likert scale, to strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree with the stated outcomes to each statement of exercising.
Baseline + end point at 12 weeks + follow up at 6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Fully anonymised data set will be published with the published paper

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Five years from published paper

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on Motivational interviews

3
Subscribe