- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03909009
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia
June 3, 2020 updated by: İbrahim Bilir, Izmir Katip Celebi University
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Pain, Fatigue, Quality of Life, Cognitive Function and Mood in Fibromyalgia
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 10 Hz neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain, stiffness, fatigue, depression/anxiety, quality of life and cognitive functions in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in two-arm parallel-group design.
Twenty participants will be randomized into 2 groups.
Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with 1:1 allocation between the active rTMS group (Group 1) and the sham-control group (Group 2).
Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS)-A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
Group 2 will receive sham stimulation-A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).All patients will be evaluated with pain severity (VAS-10mm),stiffness severity (VAS-10mm), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Depression Anxiety Scale (HADS), Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-revised version (ACE-R).Patients will be questioned for the safety of treatment.
Available drug therapies will be continued in both groups.
Patients and clinical raters will be blinded to treatment.
All patients will be reviewed by the investigator in terms of rTMS treatment safety and motor threshold determination before each treatment session and observed for possible side effects after treatment.
All side effects will be recorded.
Magnetic stimulation will be applied using Neurosoft-Neuro MS/D with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil.
rTMS therapy will be applied under the guide of neuronavigation with the following parameters: target-left DLPFC, with the %90 of the RMT, 10 Hz stimulation for 5 seconds intervals (on) with 25 seconds inter-train intervals (off), 15 minutes, 1500 pulses.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
İzmir, Turkey, 35290
- Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults (age between 18-65 years)
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
- The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10
- Stable treatment for at least last 3 months
- Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...)
- The presence of malignancy
- Systemic rheumatic diseases
- Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities
- Alcohol or drug addiction
- Major depression / personality disorder history
- Have received TMS treatment before
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Active rTMS
Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator
|
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
Group 2 will receive sham stimulation.
A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
Time Frame: in the second week
|
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
in the second week
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
Time Frame: in the sixth week
|
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
in the sixth week
|
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: in the sixth week
|
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week).
The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points.
Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
|
in the sixth week
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness
Time Frame: in the second week
|
The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
|
in the second week
|
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: in the second week
|
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week).
The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points.
Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
|
in the second week
|
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time Frame: in the sixth week
|
Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale.
Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items.
Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity.
(Total score range: 1-7)
|
in the sixth week
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: in the sixth week
|
Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity.
Its subscales are anxiety and depression.
It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression.
The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively.
High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.
|
in the sixth week
|
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised
Time Frame: in the sixth week
|
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities.
Total score that can be obtained is 0-100.
Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.
|
in the sixth week
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Ayhan Aşkın, Assoc. Prof., Izmir Katip Celebi University Faculty of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
- Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
- Klein MM, Treister R, Raij T, Pascual-Leone A, Park L, Nurmikko T, Lenz F, Lefaucheur JP, Lang M, Hallett M, Fox M, Cudkowicz M, Costello A, Carr DB, Ayache SS, Oaklander AL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research. Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1601-1614. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000210.
- Knijnik LM, Dussan-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
- Hou WH, Wang TY, Kang JH. The effects of add-on non-invasive brain stimulation in fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Aug;55(8):1507-17. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew205. Epub 2016 May 5.
- Saltychev M, Laimi K. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Mar;40(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000207.
- Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Erratum In: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1168-1169.
- Baudic S, Attal N, Mhalla A, Ciampi de Andrade D, Perrot S, Bouhassira D. Unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex does not affect cognition in patients with fibromyalgia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
- Tekin A, Özdil E, Güleken MD, İlişer R, Bakım B, Öncü J, et al. Efficacy of HighFrequency [10 Hz] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the PrimaryMotor Cortex in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, DoubleBlind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2014;22(1):20-26.
- Bilir I, Askin A, Sengul I, Tosun A. Effects of High-Frequency Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2):138-146. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001536.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 11, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
April 10, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 8, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
April 9, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 16, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 3, 2020
Last Verified
June 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14032019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia
-
University of AberdeenCompletedFibromyalgia | Fibromyalgia, Primary | Fibromyalgia, SecondaryUnited Kingdom
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyCompletedFibromyalgia, Primary | Fibromyalgia, SecondaryMexico
-
Rasmia ElgoharyNot yet recruiting
-
Spaulding Rehabilitation HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)Completed
-
University of UtahTerminated
-
State University of New York - Upstate Medical...CompletedFibromyalgia, PrimaryUnited States
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompleted
-
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterCompletedFibromyalgia (FM)Israel
Clinical Trials on rTMS + Neuronavigation
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneCompletedDepersonalization DisorderFrance
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...UnknownIntracranial Neoplasm
-
Huashan HospitalShanghai Municipal Science and Technology CommissionCompletedGlioma, Motor PathwayChina
-
Stanford UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe New Venture Fund / Foundation for OCD Research; The Wellcome Leap FundRecruiting
-
Alan NicholCompletedCancer (High-grace Glioma)Canada
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedTreatment Resistant DepressionFrance
-
Medical University of South CarolinaRecruitingStroke Sequelae | Motivation | Apathy | Stroke (CVA) or TIA | Stroke/Brain Attack | AbuliaUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanRecruiting