- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03947307
Kinesiotape Treatment for Postoperative Edema After Joint Replacement Surgery of the Knee- The KNEETAPE Study (KNEETAPE)
February 19, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Kinesiotape Treatment for Postoperative Edema After Joint Replacement Surgery of the Knee -The KNEETAPE Study
Postoperative edema is a common condition affecting wound healing and function.
Traditionally, manual lymphatic drainage and compressive bandages have been employed to reduce swelling.
Kinesiotaping might be an alternative approach.
To analyse the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, satisfaction, quality of life, functional outcome and and morbidity of the use of kinesiotape for the treatment of postoperative edema after knee replacement surgery, compared to standard manual lymphatic drainage with compression (i.e.
compressive stockings or bandages) or sham taping.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
190
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Basel, Switzerland, 4031
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DOTS).
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Joint replacement surgery of the knee including conversion from partial to total joint replacement or revision surgery
- Informed Consent as documented by signature
Exclusion Criteria:
- Isolated retropatellar replacement or revision surgery for infection
- Contraindications to manual lymphatic drainage and compression treatment (i.e. compressive stockings or bandages) e.g. heart failure
- Contraindication to kinesiotape treatment, e.g. hypersensitivity to medical glue
- Dermatoses at or around the surgical site
- Suspected or confirmed local infection
- Participation in another trial with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present trial
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
- Inability for consent or assent by the patient, or lack of proxy consent in assenting patients with signs of incapacity.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental Intervention (treatment / medical device)
Patients in the experimental group will receive lymphtaping using Easytape® according to common practice on day 1 after surgery by specifically trained physiotherapists.
The tape has an elasticity of 150%.
The material is moisture- and air-permeable with a hypoallergenic adhesive coating that is activated by body temperature to increase durability of contact.
If possible the taping will be left for 7 days, in case of insufficient adhesion taping will be repeated.
|
lymphtaping using Easytape® on day 1 after surgery by specifically trained physiotherapists.
If possible the taping will be left for 7 days.
|
Active Comparator: Control Intervention (compression treatment )
Patients in the control group will be treated with manual lymphatic drainage followed by compression treatment using compressive stockings if accepted or compressive bandaging in cases with pronounced swelling depending on medical necessity.
|
manual lymphatic drainage followed by compression treatment using compressive stockings or compressive bandaging
|
Sham Comparator: Control Intervention (sham taping)
Patients in the control group will be treated by sham taping with Leukotape® Classic, a non-elastic tape, that in all other respects resembles Easytape®.
|
sham taping with Leukotape® Classic, a non-elastic tape, that in all other respects resembles Easytape®.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in leg circumference between day 1 and day 8 (in cm)
Time Frame: day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and every day thereafter for 7 days
|
Leg circumference will be measured at three levels (joint space, 5cm proximal, 5cm distal) with each three measurements performed by one assessor in all patients and time points.
The primary endpoint will be the mean of the three measurements
|
day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and every day thereafter for 7 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in leg circumference between day 0 and day 8 (in cm)
Time Frame: day 0 preoperative and day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and every day thereafter for 7 days
|
Leg circumference will be measured at three levels (joint space, 5cm proximal, 5cm distal) with each three measurements performed by one assessor in all patients and time points.
The primary endpoint will be the mean of the three measurements
|
day 0 preoperative and day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and every day thereafter for 7 days
|
Change in leg circumference between day 0 and after 6 weeks and 12 weeks (in cm)
Time Frame: day 0 preoperative and after 6 weeks and 12 weeks after start of intervention
|
Leg circumference will be measured at three levels (joint space, 5cm proximal, 5cm distal) with each three measurements performed by one assessor in all patients and time points.
The primary endpoint will be the mean of the three measurements
|
day 0 preoperative and after 6 weeks and 12 weeks after start of intervention
|
Change in range of motion of knee (in degree)
Time Frame: day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and at day 8 after start of intervention and after 6 and 12 weeks after start of intervention
|
range of motion measured using the neutral zero method
|
day 1 postoperatively before start of intervention and at day 8 after start of intervention and after 6 and 12 weeks after start of intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Quality of life assessment (EQ5D-5L)
Time Frame: assessed on day 0 preoperative, day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
assessment of 5 dimensions of life: mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, pain and psychological well-being in each 5 categories ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems"
|
assessed on day 0 preoperative, day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
Change in patient satisfaction with the received treatment (VAS)
Time Frame: assessed on day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
visual analogous scale (VAS) on which the patient can rate satisfaction with the received treatment; Scale from 0 = not at all satisfied to10 = very satisfied
|
assessed on day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
Change in Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: assessed on day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
Patient reported score.
The KOOS results in summary scores for five subscales.
It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL).
A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included.
Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee Problems.
|
assessed on day 8 and week 12 after start of intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christian Egloff, Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 8, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
February 9, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 10, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 13, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-00219; ch19Saxer3
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Edema
-
Tufts UniversityBioElectronics CorporationTerminatedPostoperative Edema and PainUnited States
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingUltrasonography | Robotic Surgical Procedures | Postoperative Respiratory Complication | Airway EdemaTurkey
-
Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research InstituteNot yet recruitingPostoperative Pneumonia | Postoperative Pulmonary Atelectasis | Postoperative Pulmonary Edema
-
Quan Dong NguyenOculis; Global Ophthalmic Research Center (GORC)RecruitingUveitis Related Cystoid Macular Edema | Cystoid Macular Edema, PostoperativeUnited States
-
University of L'AquilaDr. Leonardo Mancini; Tommaso PizzolanteCompletedEdema | Postoperative Pain | Swelling Lips & FaceItaly
-
Line KesselCompletedIrvine-Gass Syndrome | Postoperative Cystoid Macular EdemaDenmark
-
Federal University of Mato GrossoCompletedEdema | Perioperative/Postoperative ComplicationsBrazil
-
Nilay ErCompletedPain, Postoperative | Surgical Complication | Edema FaceTurkey
-
Baskent UniversityCompletedEdema | Postoperative PainTurkey
-
Mayo ClinicResearch to Prevent Blindness; VitreoRetinal Surgery, PACompletedPain, Postoperative | Age-related Macular Degeneration | Diabetic Macular Edema | Injection Site | Injection Site InfectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on lymphtaping using Easytape®
-
Clinica MediterraneaCompletedAtrial FibrillationItaly
-
AdministrateurCICPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital; Clinical Investigation Centre for Innovative Technology... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandClinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Ospedale Regionale...Recruiting
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalUnknown
-
WellSpan HealthUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedDifficult Peripheral IV AccessUnited States
-
Vital Art and Science IncorporatedNational Eye Institute (NEI); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Retina Foundation of the Southwest and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy | Diabetic Macular EdemaUnited States
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompleted
-
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation...Biosense Webster, Inc.UnknownAtrial FibrillationUnited Kingdom, Italy
-
Baxano Surgical, Inc.UnknownRadiculopathy | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineUnknown