The Application of Analgesia Nociception Index as an Objective Labor Pain Assessment During Epidural Analgesia

August 3, 2021 updated by: Changhua Christian Hospital

Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology

Epidural analgesia is considered an effective and safe method for obstetric pain control. Currently, self-assessment pain scales remain to be the gold standard in labor pain evaluation after the administration of epidural analgesia. However, individual patient susceptibility to pain perception makes difficulties for the clinicians to assess the effectiveness of painless labor precisely. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring during epidural analgesia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Epidural analgesia is considered an effective and safe method for obstetric pain control. Currently, self-assessment pain scales remain to be the gold standard in labor pain evaluation after the administration of epidural analgesia. However, individual patient susceptibility to pain perception makes difficulties for the clinicians to assess the effectiveness of painless labor precisely. Without a convincing objective tool for obstetric pain evaluation during epidural analgesia, the clinicians are hard to adjust adequate epidural drug dosage. Establishing an objective pain index would help the clinicians to have a better pain management during labor.

In 2012, M. Le Guen et al. demonstrated a linear relationship between visual analogical pain scores(VAS) and Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) values during labor. Their efforts started the application of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring. However, the reliability of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring under epidural analgesia have not yet been verified. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of ANI in obstetric pain monitoring during epidural analgesia.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Changhua City, Taiwan, 500
        • Recruiting
        • Changhua Christian Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Parturients received epidural analgesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parturients with gestational age more than 35 weeks
  • Ages between 20 to 50
  • Received epidural analgesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I or II.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Who refused to join the study
  • 2. With a history of arrhythmia
  • 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)Classification >= III
  • 4. With a history of cardiovascular, pulmonary, endocrine, neurologic or psychiatric disease
  • 5.Using medications that affecting heart rate
  • 6. Cannot understand the explanation of the study
  • 7. High-risk gestation
  • 8. Known fetal anomaly

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The correlation of subjective pain measurement by the VAS score and objective pain measurement by the ANI(Analgesia Nociception Index) score
Time Frame: 90 minutes
The VAS(visual analog scale) score is a subjective measure for pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark by the patient on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." The score will be transferred to a 0-100 index by divided 10 with the distance from the starting point to the written mark (in centimeter) and multiplied by 100. The ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score is a 0-100 index derived from heart rate variability which was applied as an objective pain measurement. The larger the index indicated less pain. The correlation of the VAS score and the ANI score will be analyzed to verified the strength of the ANI score in evaluating labor pain during epidural analgesia.
90 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The correlation of uterine contraction strength measured by cardiotocography and the ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score
Time Frame: 90 Minutes
Uterine contraction strength was measured by external cardiotocography with a scare from 0-100.The ANI (Analgesia Nociception Index) score is a 0-100 index derived from heart rate variability which was applied as an objective pain measurement. The larger the index indicated less pain. The correlation of the uterine contraction strength and the ANI score will be analyzed to verified if the ANI score changing with related to uterine contraction.
90 Minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Shao-Lun Tsao, MD, Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 17, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 21, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ANIpainlesslabor

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individuals participants data for primary outcome measure will be made available

IPD Sharing Time Frame

data will be available within 1 year of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by an external Independent Review Panel. Requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Pain

Clinical Trials on Analgesia nociception index

3
Subscribe