A Placebo-Controlled Study Using VP-102 in the Treatment of External Genital Warts (CARE-1)

August 27, 2021 updated by: Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects With External Genital Warts

This is a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the dose regimen, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of VP-102 in subjects with External Genital Warts (EGW). This study is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). Increasing durations of skin exposure to study drug (VP-102 or placebo) will be evaluated in three treatment groups prior to progressing to enrollment in Part B. Part A & B will enroll a approximately 108 subjects completing 4 treatment applications every 21 days and continuing with follow-up assessments at Day 84, 112 and 147.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is to determine the Dose Regimen, Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VP-102 in Subjects with External Genital Warts. It is divided into two parts (Part A and Part B). The aim of Part A is to determine the two best treatment regimens for evaluation of safety and efficacy in Part B.In Part A, Study drug (VP-102 or placebo) will be administered once every 21 days for up to four applications. Enrollment will begin in Group 1, then proceed into Group 2, and lastly into Group 3. A safety review will be conducted to determine whether enrollment can be initiated into the next Group. An additional blinded safety review will be performed after all six subjects in Group 3 have completed the 48-hour Visit, in order to support dose selection for Part B (Safety and Efficacy). Part B of the study will begin enrollment only after the Sponsor has selected the two dose regimens from Part A. The study will remain blinded until completion of both parts of the study.

In Part A, up to 18 subjects will be randomized to VP-102 or placebo treatment with three different regimens. When Part B is open an additional ~90 subjects will be enrolled and randomized to VP-102 or placebo with two treatment regimens. Two of the treatment arms will be VP-102 Regimen 1 and VP-102 Regimen 2. The other two treatment arms will be placebo (Placebo Regimen 1 and Placebo Regimen 2), with corresponding durations of skin exposure matching those selected for VP-102 Regimen 1 and Regimen 2. As an example, if the regimens selected from Part A are the 2-hour and 6-hour applications of VP-102, then VP-102 Regimen 1 would be VP-102 treatment for 2-hours and VP-102 Regimen 2 would be VP-102 treatment for 6-hours. Likewise, Placebo Regimen 1 would be placebo treatment for 2 hours and Placebo Regimen 2 would be placebo treatment for 6-hours. Randomization of the four treatment arms (VP-102 Regimen 1:VP-102 Regimen 2:Placebo Regimen 1:Placebo Regimen 2) will be 3:3:2:2. In both Regimen 1 and Regimen 2, study drug will be administered to EGW once every 21 days for up to four applications. Subjects will be asked to remove the study drug at the designated time selected from the dose regimen findings in Part A of the study. Treatment will continue with a minimum of every 21 days, until complete clearance or a maximum of four treatment sessions. Safety assessments including recording of local skin reactions are conducted at each treatment visit and at follow up visits Day 84, 112, and 147.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
        • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center,PC
    • Louisiana
      • Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70816
        • Delricht Research
    • Michigan
      • Clarkston, Michigan, United States, 48346
        • Clarkston Skin Research
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74133
        • Delricht Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be healthy, immunocompetent males or females ≥ 18 years of age
  • Present with ≥ 2 and ≤ 30 external genital and/or perianal warts in ≥ 1 of the following anatomic areas:

    • In both sexes: medial thigh (except inguinal fold); supra-pubic, perineal, and perianal areas
    • In men: over the glans penis (excluding urethral meatus), penis shaft, scrotum, and foreskin
    • In women: vulva (excluding labia minora and mucosal surfaces)
  • Have warts present for ≥ 4 weeks at the baseline visit
  • Have warts that are ≤ 8 mm in diameter each

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a wart within the allowed treatment area > 8 mm in diameter or with an eroded or ulcerated surface, in the Investigator's opinion
  • Have an unclear diagnosis of condyloma
  • Have any wart types other than genital warts (e.g., common or plantar warts) that require treatment during the study period
  • Have active genital herpes eruption, or had active genital herpes lesions within 4 weeks before enrollment
  • Have a history of neoplasia or other HPV-associated malignancies within the last 5 years
  • Are systemically immunosuppressed
  • Are sexually active or may become sexually active and are unwilling to practice responsible birth control methods
  • Are pregnant or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 2 hour-Active
For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 2 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B VP-102 will be applied for 2 hours and removed.In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
Other Names:
  • VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 6-hour Active
For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
Other Names:
  • VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
Active Comparator: Part A: VP-102 24-hour Active
For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. If selected as a dose regimen for Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. In both parts, VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
Other Names:
  • VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
Placebo Comparator: Part A: Placebo
For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 2-,6- or 24- hours and removed. Placebo is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
The placebo single-use applicator contains the same formulation as the VP-102 applicator but does not contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient cantharidin
Active Comparator: Part B & A: VP-102 6 hour-Active
Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 6 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
Other Names:
  • VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
Placebo Comparator: Part B & A: 6-hour-Placebo
Part B, Placebo will be applied for 6 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
The placebo single-use applicator contains the same formulation as the VP-102 applicator but does not contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient cantharidin
Active Comparator: Part B & A: VP-102 24-hour Active
For part A, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. If 24 hours is selected as a dose regimen for Part B, VP-102 will be applied for 24 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
In part A, VP-102 will be applied for either 2, 6 or 24 hours with each regimen compared to placebo. For part B, 2 of the regimens from part A will be chosen for Part B with each compared to Placebo. Only 4 arms are actually being studied.
Other Names:
  • VP-102 (cantharidin) 0.7% w/v topical solution
Placebo Comparator: Part B & A: 24-hour-Placebo
Part B, VP-Placebo will be applied for 24 hours and removed. VP-102 is applied every 21 days for 4 treatments.
The placebo single-use applicator contains the same formulation as the VP-102 applicator but does not contain the active pharmaceutical ingredient cantharidin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Complete Clearance of All Treatable Warts at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit.
Time Frame: Compares baseline wart count to Day 84, end of treatment.
Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at the Study Day 84 EOT Visit.
Compares baseline wart count to Day 84, end of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Complete Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Clearance compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of subjects exhibiting complete clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Clearance compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting 90% Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of subjects exhibiting 90% clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting 75% Clearance of All Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of subjects exhibiting 75% clearance of all treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2, (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.

Change from baseline in the number of treatable warts (baseline and new) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).

Number of warts present were recorded at each treatment visit as well as follow-up visits. For each post baseline treatment visit, the change in number of warts from baseline was calculated.

Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Percent change from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Percent Change from Baseline in the Number of Treatable Warts (Baseline and New) at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Percent change from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Exhibiting Reduction of ≥ 1 Treatable Wart From Baseline at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of subjects exhibiting reduction of ≥ 1 treatable wart from baseline at Treatment Visit 2, Treatment Visit 3, Treatment Visit 4, Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Compared from baseline to each study visit, treatment 2 (Day 21), 3 (Day 42), 4 (Day 63) and Day 84, 112 and 147.
Proportion of Subjects Who Are Clear at the Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit and Remain Clear at the Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (End of Study)
Time Frame: Complete clearance compared from Day 84 to follow-up days 112 and 147.
Proportion of subjects who are clear at all three study visits, Study Day 84 (End of Treatment) Visit and remain clear at the Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (End of Study).
Complete clearance compared from Day 84 to follow-up days 112 and 147.
Change From Baseline in Total Wart Area (Sum of Individual Warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Study Day 84, Follow-up Visits at Days 112 and 147 (EOS)
Change from baseline in total wart area (sum of individual warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Baseline to Study Day 84, Follow-up Visits at Days 112 and 147 (EOS)
Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Wart Area (Sum of Individual Warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)
Percent Change from baseline in the total wart area (sum of individual warts) at Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS).
Baseline to Study Day 84 (EOT), and Follow-up Visits on Study Day 112 and Study Day 147 (EOS)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott Guenthner, MD, The Indiana Clinical Trials Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Diseases

Clinical Trials on VP-102 and applicator

3
Subscribe