Gastrointestinal Dysfunction During Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients

July 9, 2019 updated by: Ayse Gulsah Atasever, Ayancık State Hospital

The Frequency, Risk Factors, and Complications of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction During Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients

Gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders in intensive care patients remain relatively unexplored. Nowadays, the frequency, risk factors and complications of GI dysfunction during enteral nutrition (EN) become more questionable. Our aim is to evaluate the frequency, risk factors and complications of GI dysfunction during EN in the first 2 weeks of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and to identify precautions to prevent the development of GI dysfunction and avoid complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Critical illness is typically associated with a catabolic stress state in which patients demonstrate a systemic inflammatory response coupled with complications of increased infectious morbidity, multiple organ dysfunction, prolonged hospitalization, and disproportionate mortality. Suspension of feeding and the resultant inability to reach nutritional goals is one complication of gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, but there are others (mucosal barrier disruption, altered motility, atrophy of the mucosa, and reduced mass of gut-associated lymphoid tissue) that may explain the greater length of stay (LOS) and death rate with GI dysfunction. In Europe and the United States, nutritional administration guidelines recommend primarily enteral nutrition (EN) for hemodynamically stable intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Providing EN in these patients has been shown to be superior to parenteral nutrition. GI complications such as constipation, delayed gastric emptying, diarrhea, and vomiting may occur in up to 50% of mechanically ventilated patients and adversely affect ICU mortality and LOS. Nevertheless, there is no consensus for obtaining a precise assessment of GI function.Diagnosis of GI dysfunction in ICU patients is complex and relies on clinical symptoms. Lack of validated markers of GI system dysfunction is often misdiagnosed and poorly managed in the ICU. The role of nutrition in critical illness is important, but there is an increasing evidence and broadening consensus that aggressive early feeding as well as prolonged underfeeding both should be avoided. Avoidance of complications like malnutrition, aspiration of gastric contents, wound infections, and decubitus through GI dysfunction is an important part of management of patients with GI failure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

137

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

In this prospective observational study, 137 out of 226 patients consecutively admitted into a mixed medical-surgical ICU from 1 January 2015 to 31 June 2015 were enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Older than 18 years old. Stay longer than 48 hours at ICU.

Exclusion Criteria:

Has enterostomy/colostomy or diagnosis of GI bleeding. Prone position. Laxative drug use. Clostridium Difficile infection positivity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group I
Patients who had GI dysfunction (Group I) for one or more occasions.
A total of 137 patients who received nasogastric tube feeding in an ICU of a tertiary hospital were enrolled.
A total of 137 patients who received nasogastric tube feeding in an ICU of a tertiary hospital were enrolled.
Group II
Patients who had normal GI function (Group II) for one or more occasions.
A total of 137 patients who received nasogastric tube feeding in an ICU of a tertiary hospital were enrolled.
A total of 137 patients who received nasogastric tube feeding in an ICU of a tertiary hospital were enrolled.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of GI dysfunction
Time Frame: up to 14 days.
Constipation, diarrhea, UDI
up to 14 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA) score
Time Frame: at admission.
SOFA Score is a mortality pre-score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems. Each organ system is assigned a point value from 0 (normal)to 4 (high degree of dysfunction/failure). The SOFA score ranges from 0 to 24.The highest SOFA score correlates with highest mortality rates. Scores of more than 11 corresponded to mortality of more than 80%.
at admission.
Hypoalbuminemia
Time Frame: up to 14 days.
below 2,5 g/dl
up to 14 days.
Catecholamine use
Time Frame: up to 14 days.
mcg
up to 14 days.
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: through study completion, which is 6 months time period.
days
through study completion, which is 6 months time period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Evren Senturk, Assoc. Prof, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014/1870

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation

Clinical Trials on MDR bacteria positivity

3
Subscribe