Development of a Mobile App for an Executive Functioning Intervention for Adolescents

November 19, 2021 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
This study develops an initial prototype of a mobile tool that will support clinician-directed behavioral/organizational skills treatment for adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with input guided from key stakeholders.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common childhood mental health disorders, affecting 7-9% of children and adolescents, and leading to substantial impairment in adolescence. Despite evidence suggesting that behavioral interventions are efficacious, approximately 40-60% of adolescents receiving behavioral treatment show little to no improvement and skills are rarely generalized beyond treatment sessions. Lack of adolescent motivation and engagement, between-session skills use, reward saliency, and family involvement are key contributors to these limited effects. Mobile digital health (dHealth) strategies and gamification techniques, offer unique opportunities for overcoming the barriers of treatments specific to ADHD by using interactive tools to reinforce in-vivo skill practice, providing opportunities for immediate reinforcement, and motivating adolescents with digital rewards. The primary goal of this study is to develop and preliminarily test the integration of a digital health tool into organizational/behavioral skills treatment for adolescents with ADHD by improving executive functioning skills, providing in-vivo skills reinforcement, and monitoring adolescents' skill utilization. The proposed research will use an iterative stakeholder-centered design to develop, refine, and preliminarily test a novel digital health tool, applied as an adjunct to behavioral treatment for adolescents with ADHD (ages 11-15). This includes focus groups with key stakeholders and an open preliminary feasibility trial and usability testing. Data collected from focus groups will inform what content and features could be developed to overcome challenges to adolescent engagement and parent involvement. During the open trial (N=20) we will assess intervention feasibility, usability, and acceptability. During and after the clinical trial, we will collect continuous feedback from users on the usability and utility of the tool. At the end of this study we will complete debugging and programming to maximize usability before a future larger clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Youth ages of 11-14 years (6-8th grade) that are attending a participating school
  • 2) referred by SMHP as a youth with apparent ADHD-related problems,
  • 3) ≥6 symptoms (item score ≥2) of Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity on the pooled parent and teacher Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale
  • 4) ≥3 on the Impairment Rating Scale by parent and teacher (cross-situational impairment)
  • 5) Parent consent and adolescent assent must be provided; b)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) No presence of conditions that are incompatible with this study's treatment including: Parent or adolescent report of a prior diagnosis of either Autism Spectrum Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, a Dissociative Disorder, Severe visual or hearing impairment, severe language delay or intellectual impairment, or a Psychotic Disorder will be excluded. Rationale: Individuals with these disorders often have very dysregulated behavior and impairments that deviate from the focus of this study.
  • 2) Adolescent is in all-day special education classes or if core classes not in regular education classrooms. Rationale: The vast majority of adolescent with ADHD are served in regular education classrooms and students in full-day self-contained classrooms often have different challenges than students in regular education.
  • 3) Adolescent planning to change (start or stop) psychotropic medication. Note: Adolescents taking medication will be required to meet all entry criteria, including impairment criteria, thus indicating a need for the intervention. Adolescent taking medication for attention or behavior are eligible as long as their medication regimens are stable. Participating parents will also need to be able to read/speak English because all measures are in English, and the intervention will be conducted in English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Behavioral/organizational skills intervention plus mobile app
Behavioral/organizational skills intervention plus mobile application (16, 20-30 minute sessions, twice/weekly for 8 weeks)
Behavioral/organizational skills intervention with digital health application augmentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)
10-item technology-agnostic scale assessing technology product usability. The total SUS score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher usability. SUS scores above 80 indicated good usability. The SUS has high internal consistency (α=.91) and high convergent validity with a separate rating of usability and user satisfaction (r=.8). The present study will assess system usability at post-treatment (month 3).
at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)
Post Stakeholder Feasibility and Usability Rating
Time Frame: at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)
8-item Stakeholder Feasibility and Usability Rating (SFUR) was used to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the overall feasibility and usability of the program. The SFUR score is a mean of all items and ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher feasibility and usability. This measure was developed for the present study. The present study will assess these feasibility ratings at post-treatment (month 3).
at month 3 (1-month post-intervention)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Services Use in Children and Adolescents - Parent Interview (SCA-PI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (month 0) to Post-Intervention (3 months)
SCA-PI (Hoagwood et al., 2004) will assess medication and psychosocial treatment use and changes in use including any school (e.g., Daily Report Card) or community services during the study from baseline/pre-treatment (month 0) to post-intervention (3 months).
Change from Baseline (month 0) to Post-Intervention (3 months)
Demographics/Background Form
Time Frame: Baseline (month 0)
A background form will collect information sufficient to calculate Hollingshead Socioeconomic Index as well as family income, marital status, and child's developmental and psychiatric history. Teachers and SMHPs will also complete a brief demographic form to assess age, race, and experience.
Baseline (month 0)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melissa R Dvorsky, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Behavioral/organizational skills intervention augmented with digital health application

3
Subscribe