Clinical Validation of Continuous and Non-invasive Monitoring of Effective Pulmonary Volume.

October 9, 2022 updated by: Fernando Suarez Sipmann

Clinical Validation of Continuous and Non-invasive Monitoring of Effective Pulmonary Volume Based on Exhaled CO2 Kinetics in Ventilated Patients.

The aim of this study is to evaluate/validate a new non-invasive method to continuously monitor effective lung volume in critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The capnodinamyc method is a new monitoring method that provides continuous (breath by breath) measurements of effective pulmonary blood flow (EPBF) and effective end-expiratory l lung volume (EELVCO2). The former refers to the non-shunted fraction of cardiac output and the latter to the functional end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) that contains CO2.

The capnodynamic method is based on the advanced analysis of CO2 kinetics and the law of Conservation of mass. It states that lungs have to eliminate a similar amounts of CO2 as produced by aerobic metabolism and reaches the lung via pulmonary perfusion. For its calculation, two different measurements are needed:

  1. Exhaled CO2 measured by infrared optic sensor technology placed in a mainstream configuration between the endotracheal tube and the "Y" piece of the ventilator respiratory circuit.
  2. Flow, airway pressure and ventilatory volumes measured by the mechanical ventilator spirometer.

The method requires the generation of cyclic small changes in the alveolar concentration of CO2 which is achieved by introducing a slightly modified breathing pattern. It consists of adding a short expiratory hold in each 3 out of 9 consecutive breaths and requires the patient to be in passive breathing conditions under mechanical ventilation.

EPBF and EELVCO2 have been validated in experimental conditions and the first validations in patients in the setting of general anesthesia are under way.

Methods:

This study on EELVCO2 in critically ill patients involves 2 types of evaluations:

The validation of absolute values of EELV by comparing it with CTsan. The trending ability of EELVCO2 in critically ill patients by comparing it with EIT.

A calculated sample size of 30 patients is required for each objective.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Hospital Universitario de la Princesa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients on mechanical ventilation in passive breathing conditions in which a thoracic CTscan has been indicated for medical reasons and those with an EIT and a continuous cardiac monitoring
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Presence of barotrauma/ pneumothorax
  • Presence of bronchopleural fistulas
  • Thorax alterations that preclude the positioning of the EIT electrode belt (usually at the IV intercostal space).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation of the measurement of absolute values of effective lung volume
Time Frame: 1 day
To validate the measurement of absolute values of effective lung volume by the capnodynamic method previously described, as an estimate of end-expiratory lung volume. For this purpose the capnodynamic method will be compared with gold standard reference method for measuring lung volumes, the computerized tomography scan (CTscan).
1 day
Analyze to which pulmonary compartments does effective lung volume most closely correlate
Time Frame: 1 day
Tomographic aeration level according to the density distribution analysis (non aerated, poorly aerated, normally and hyper aerated) does effective lung volume most closely correlate; taking into account that the CTscan measures an anatomic rather than a functional lung volume.
1 day
Improvement of capnodynamic ELV measurement
Time Frame: 1 day
To determine the effects of lung collapse on the accuracy and precision of the capnodynamic ELV measurement.
1 day
Trending ability of the capnodynamic end-expiratory lung volume method
Time Frame: 1 day
Breath by breath changes in EELVCO2 will be compared with breath by breath changes in lung aeration measured by electrical impedance tomography.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fernando Suarez Sipmann, MD PhD, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EELVC02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

3
Subscribe