Hyaluronic Acid Evaluation as Adjuvant to Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy

September 28, 2019 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Hyaluronic Acid Evaluation as Adjuvant to Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy in Wilkes Stages

This study evaluates the addition of hyaluronic acid to temporomandibular joint arthroscopy in the treatment of internal derangements in adults. A participants group will receive temporomandibular joint arthroscopy plus hyaluronic acid, while the other group will receive temporomandibular joint arthroscopy. Hypothesis: hyaluronic acid as an adjunct in temporomandibular joint arthroscopic surgery provides additional benefits in clinical and radiological outcomes in temporomandibular joint internal derangements.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangements in Wilkes stages III and IV by magnetic resonance imaging
  • Limitation of maximum oral opening or duplication of joint pain by palpation
  • lack of response to conservative therapies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any degenerative systemic disease of muscular or joint involvement (rheumatoid arthritis, etc.)
  • Previous temporomandibular joint surgical treatment: arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or open surgery
  • Infection in Temporomandibular Joint or in puncture site
  • Hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids injection in Temporomandibular Joint in previous 6 months
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Participants who refuse to complete the treatment or unavailable to complete the follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: arthroscopy
Temporomandibular joint arthroscopy is performed under general anesthesia by the same expert temporomandibular joint arthroscopy surgeon. Lysis and Lavage is performed in the upper joint space in all cases. Ringer's lactate is use as irrigation fluid. All participants receive Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid, 1g I.V. and Dexamethasone, 4 mg I.V. (Intraoperative); as well as Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid, 500/125 mg / 8h / 5 days by mouth; Diclofenac 100 mg / 12h / 5 days by mouth; and Metamizol 575 mg / 8h by mouth (Post-operatively). Soft diet and a home exercise program are implemented in all patients after 24 hours post-operative.
Lysis and Lavage
Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid, 1g I.V. (Intraoperative); as well as Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid, 500/125 mg / 8h / 5 days by mouth (Post-operative).
Dexamethasone, 4 mg I.V. (Intraoperative)
Diclofenac 100 mg / 12h / 5 days by mouth (Post-operatively).
Metamizol 575 mg / 8h by mouth (Post-operatively)
Home exercise program
Active Comparator: arthroscopy plus hyaluronic Acid
Temporomandibular joint arthroscopy is performed under general anesthesia by the same expert temporomandibular joint arthroscopy surgeon. Lysis and Lavage is performed in the upper joint space in all cases. Ringer's lactate is use as irrigation fluid. All participants receive Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid, 1g I.V. and Dexamethasone, 4 mg I.V. (Intraoperative); as well as Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid, 500/125 mg / 8h / 5 days by mouth; Diclofenac 100 mg / 12h / 5 days by mouth; and Metamizol 575 mg / 8h by mouth (Post-operatively). Soft diet and a home exercise program are implemented in all patients after 24 hours post-operative. An hyaluronic acid injection of 1 mL (Durolane®, 20 mg / mL, Zambon, Barcelona, Spain) at the end of arthroscopy that was only performed in this arm.
Lysis and Lavage
Amoxicillin / Clavulanic Acid, 1g I.V. (Intraoperative); as well as Amoxicillin / clavulanic acid, 500/125 mg / 8h / 5 days by mouth (Post-operative).
Dexamethasone, 4 mg I.V. (Intraoperative)
Diclofenac 100 mg / 12h / 5 days by mouth (Post-operatively).
Metamizol 575 mg / 8h by mouth (Post-operatively)
Home exercise program
1 mL Hyaluronic Acid Injection (20 mg/mL, 7000 KDa) at the end of arthroscopy .
Other Names:
  • Sodium Hyaluronate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change from Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at 3,6,9 and 12 Months
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Visual Analog Scale 0 to 10. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Mean Change from Baseline in Maximal Oral Opening Scores (mm) at 3,6,9 and 12 Months
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
measured from edge of upper central incisor to edge of lower antagonist incisor. Range scale 0 to 60 (mm). Higher values represent a better outcome.
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Mean Change from Baseline in Oral Health Impact Profile-14 Spanish Version (OHIP-14sp) questionnaire Scores at 6 and 12 Months
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 6, Month 12.
OHIP-14sp questionnaire total average score to measure Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. Range scale 0 to 56. Higher values represent a worse outcome. Total average score is calculated by adding the score of each question and dividing by 14
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 6, Month 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with Treatment Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: From intervention to end of study at 12 Months. During procedure or immediately after intervention, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
any adverse response to the intervention
From intervention to end of study at 12 Months. During procedure or immediately after intervention, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Symptoms Duration Mean (Months)
Time Frame: At baseline
symptoms duration mean reported by the participants
At baseline
Number of Participants with chondromalacia
Time Frame: During intervention
arthroscopic finding
During intervention
Number of Participants with synovitis
Time Frame: During intervention
arthroscopic finding
During intervention
Irrigation Volume Mean (cc)
Time Frame: During intervention
average irrigation fluid used during intervention
During intervention
Number of Participants with Occlusal Stabilization Splint
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
stabilization splint use reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with Osteophyte by magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: At baseline and Month 12.
radiographic finding in jaw condyle
At baseline and Month 12.
Number of Participants with joint surfaces flattening by magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: At baseline and Month 12
radiographic finding in jaw condyle or temporal bone
At baseline and Month 12
Number of Participants with Subchondral Geode by magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: At baseline and Month 12
radiographic finding in jaw condyle
At baseline and Month 12
Disc Position by magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: At baseline and Month 12
No Displacement, Disc Displacement with Reduction, Disc Displacement without Reduction
At baseline and Month 12
Number of Participants with pain in masseter muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with pain in Temporal muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with pain in Medial Pterygoid Muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with pain in digastric Muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with pain in Genihyoid Muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
Number of Participants with pain in Mylohyoid Muscle by digital palpation
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.
pain reported by the participant
From enrollment to end of study at 12 Months. Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jorge Cano Sánchez, Complutense University of Madrid
  • Study Director: Julian Campo Trapero, Complutense University of Madrid
  • Study Director: Mario Fernando Muñoz Guerra, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
  • Principal Investigator: Oscar Gabriel Castaño Joaqui, Complutense University of Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy

3
Subscribe