Compensatory Training to Support Brain Healthy Lifestyle Changes in Those at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

November 15, 2020 updated by: Dona E. Locke, Mayo Clinic

Compensatory Training to Support Everyday Function and Adherence to Brain Healthy Lifestyle Changes in Those at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

The Researchers are trying to better understand if behavioral interventions can help improve memory compensation and engagement in healthy lifestyle behaviors in those with memory concerns but normal mental status exam.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50 or older
  • A positive complaint or concern in response to two questions ('Do you feel like your memory or other aspects of thinking are becoming worse?' and 'Does this worry you?')
  • Normal cognitive performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (adjusted for age and education)
  • Self-reported independent function in daily life as measure by the Lawson IADL scale (IADL=8)
  • English speaking
  • Approval letter from a physician (due to the exercise component)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known neurological disorder with potential cognitive symptoms (a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, a history of significant TBI, etc.)
  • Uncontrolled moderate or severe depression (e.g., CES-D > 21).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Self-implementation
Individuals randomized to this group will be given all the materials about cognitive compensations techniques and brain health behavior guidelines and encouraged to implement those on their own.
Self-implementation of cognitive rehabilitation and health behavior change recommendations
Experimental: Health-behavior intervention
Individuals randomized to this group will attend 10 weekly classes designed to provide information about cognitive compensation techniques and brain health behaviors as well as interventional support to implement those recommendations with homework and follow-up classes.
Cognitive rehabilitation and health behavior change intervention in a group-based program intervention compared to self-implementation of techniques without these interventions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Everyday Compensation Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report and informant report if an informant is available of compensatory strategy use; range 0-148 with higher scores indicating more compensatory use
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Lifestyle Activities Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of cognitive activities, range 13-65 with higher scores indicating more activity
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
BrainHQ
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Number of minutes on BrainHQ computer exercise program
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Physical Activities Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of physical activity; scores include number of days per week across 7 activity types and number of minutes in each activity when completed.
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of mindfulness, range of 11-66 with higher scores indicating more mindful daily experience
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Everyday Cognition
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of everyday functioning, range 39-156 with higher scores indicating more problems in daily functioning
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Quality of Life (in aging and cognitive health)
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of quality of life, range of 13-52 with higher scores indicating better quality of life
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Psychological well-being
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of psychological well-being/happiness; there is a total score plus subscales of autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, self-acceptance. Each subscale has 9 items for a total of 54 items. Total scores range from 54-324 with higher scores indicating higher psychological well being. Each subscale ranges from 9-54 with higher scores indicating greater well-being on that construct.
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Centers for Epidemiological Studies - Depression
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
self-report of symptoms of depression.Range 0-60 with higher scores indicating more depression
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Cognitive measure of memory
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Hopkins Verbal Memory test. Staff administered standardized verbal memory task. Scores include total words recalled and total recalled after a delay with higher scores indicating greater recall
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
cognitive measure of executive functioning
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Trailmaking test; Staff administered standardized measure of attention and executive functioning. Scores include time to complete the task (with higher scores being slower) and number of errors
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
cognitive measure of verbal fluency
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Controlled Oral Word Association Test; Staff administered standardized measure of speed and verbal fluency. Score is number of items in one minute with higher scores indicating better functioning
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
cognitive measure of visual scanning speed
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Symbol Digit Modalities Test; Staff administered standardize measure of speed and visual scanning. Scores indicate number of items completed in the time frame with higher scores indicating better functioning.
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
cognitive measure of response inhibition
Time Frame: baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months
Stroop Color Word Test; Staff administered standardized measure of speed and response inhibition. Scores indicate number of items completed in the time limit with higher scores indicating better functioning
baseline, change from baseline at end of 10 week treatment, change from baseline at 3 months, change from baseline at 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dona Locke, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study is quite small and is meant a pilot data for preliminary feasibility and effect size estimating.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Self-implementation

3
Subscribe