The Effect of Telephone Symptom Triage Protocols in Patients With Cancer Therapy (TeleTRIAGE)

November 13, 2019 updated by: Arife ALTIN ÇETİN, Akdeniz University

The Effect of Telephone Symptom Triage Protocols on Symptom Management, Quality of Life and Self-Care Maintenance in Patients With Cancer Who Applied Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of telephone symptom triage protocols on symptom management, quality of life and self-maintenance in patients with cancer who applied systemic treatment. The study is a randomized controlled experimental study. Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) guides were translated into Turkish and expert opinions were obtained. The sample of the study included 70 cancer (35 interventions and 35 controls) patients who were treated with chemotherapy were randomized into the computer program.

According to the interference protocol of the study: Preliminary interviews were conducted with the newly diagnosed patients in the control and intervention groups. Preliminary tests (Personal Information Form, Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Form-General - FACT-G (Version 4) Quality of Life Scale and Self-Care Power Scale) were performed after obtaining consent. After the pre-tests, the patients who were included in the intervention group were given the symptom triage protocol usage guide created according to the symptom triage protocol. The patients were informed by the researcher about the content and use of the guideline. The patients included in the intervention group were searched by the researcher on the 3rd, 7th and 10th days after each chemotherapy for 3 cycles of chemotherapy. During the three-month follow-ups, patients were able to call the investigator 7/24 to request symptom triage. In accordance with the Remote Symptom Management Guidelines for Adults Treated with Cancer, patient triage was performed for symptom management and patients were referred to the appropriate sources according to the severity of the symptom. The patients in the control group did not undergo any intervention other than routine hospital follow-up. Patients who were included in the control and intervention groups were subjected to final tests at the hospital after 3 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of telephone symptom triage protocols on symptom management, quality of life and self-maintenance in patients with cancer who applied systemic treatment. The study is a randomized controlled experimental study.

Before starting the research, permissions were taken. Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) guides were translated into Turkish and expert opinions were obtained.

The sample of the study included cancer patients who were treated with chemotherapy in the Akdeniz University Hospital Day Chemotherapy Unit. The study included 80% power, 95% reliability and 0.05 error margins, and 70 patients (35 interventions and 35 controls) were randomized into the computer program.

According to the interference protocol of the study:

  • Four patients who received systemic chemotherapy were tested with pilot study.
  • Patients were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria and randomization list.
  • Preliminary interviews were conducted with the newly diagnosed patients in the control and intervention groups. Preliminary tests were performed after obtaining consent. For this purpose, Personal Information Form, Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Form-General - FACT-G (Version 4) Quality of Life Scale and Self-Care Power Scale were applied.
  • After the pre-tests, the patients who were included in the intervention group were given the symptom triage protocol usage guide created according to the symptom triage protocol. The patients were informed by the researcher about the content and use of the guideline. Information about the contents of the guide was made between 10:00-14:00 hours during working hours during the week and it took an average of 15-20 minutes.
  • The patients included in the intervention group were searched by the researcher on the 3rd, 7th and 10th days after each chemotherapy for 3 cycles of chemotherapy.
  • During the three-month follow-ups, patients were able to call the investigator 7/24 to request symptom triage.
  • In accordance with the Remote Symptom Management Guidelines for Adults Treated with Cancer, patient triage was performed for symptom management and patients were referred to the appropriate sources according to the severity of the symptom.
  • In case of urgent necessity, patients were referred from the second consultant who were from Medical Oncology Department.
  • The frequency of calls for the symptom triage protocol application of the intervention group was monitored and the information was recorded in the intervention group telephone interview form.
  • The patients in the control group did not undergo any intervention other than routine hospital follow-up.
  • Patients who were included in the control and intervention groups were subjected to final tests at the hospital after 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antalya, Turkey, 07058
        • Arife Altin Cetin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to come to Medical Oncology Polyclinic and Chemotherapy Unit for outpatient treatment
  2. First-time diagnosed cancer
  3. Know her/his diagnossis and/or able to express verbal
  4. Having undergone a cure chemotherapy treatment
  5. Chemotherapy was applied every 21-28 days
  6. Between 18-65 years (not to interfere with physical, psychological and functional problems that may develop due to old age)
  7. Able to understand and write Turkish
  8. Able to use mobil telephone
  9. No disability to answer questions physically, cognitively or spiritually
  10. Non-bed dependent
  11. Willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having diagnosed with psychiatric disease
  2. Having memory or cognitive disorder
  3. Patients receiving chemotherapy every seven or 14 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The Effect of Telephone Symptom Triage Protocols

Intervention group received symptom triage application with telephone, which consisted of guiding in line with symptom triage protocols. The patients who were included in the intervention were followed up by telephone on the 3rd, 7th and 10th day of after chemotherapy total of nine times during three chemotherapy cycles.

Symptom management, quality of life and self-maintenance were assessed by scales at the first interview and 3 months later.

Symptom management, quality of life and self-maintenance were assessed by scales at the first interview and 3 months later.

Intervention group received symptom triage application with telephone, which consisted of guiding in line with symptom triage protocols. The patients who were included in the intervention were followed up by telephone on the 3rd, 7th and 10th day of after chemotherapy total of nine times during three chemotherapy cycles.

No Intervention: Control group
The control group received standard nursing care applied at the hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chemotherapy Symptom Assessment Scale (C-SAS)
Time Frame: 12 week
The scale was developed by Brown et al. (2001) in the UK and aims to measure 24 chemotherapy symptoms in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. C-SAS consists of three parts.The highest and lowest scores are not calculated for the total score in the scale. Since each symptom is evaluated separately, the median values are calculated instead of the arithmetic mean. In this study, Turkish version of the scale was used.
12 week
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Forum-General - FACT-G (Version 4)
Time Frame: 12 week
The scale was developed by "Center on Outcomes, Research, and Education Northwestern Healthcare" in USA and it is used to evaluate the quality of life of malignant patients.The FACT-G assesses four dimensions of quality of life: physical status, social and family status, emotional status and activity status.The FACT-G contains 27 items and each item score ranges from 0 to 5.The total score is between 0-108. High score indicates that the individual perceives life quality is to be high. In this study, Turkish version of the scale was used.
12 week
The self-care agency scale
Time Frame: 12 week
The scale was developed by Kearney ve Fleicher (1979) to measure people's ability to look after themselves or their power. The scale contains 35 items and each item score ranges from 0 to 5. The highest and lowest possible score is between 35-140. The scores according to the Self-Care Agency scale is considered 24-64 points are as poor, 65-100 points as moderate, 101-112 points as good and 113-138 points as very good self-care power level. The higher scores indicates better self-care ability of the individual. In this study, Turkish version of the scale was used.
12 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hicran BEKTAŞ, Professor, Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on The Effect of Telephone Symptom Triage Protocols on Symptom Management, Quality of Life and Self-Care Maintenance in Patients with Cancer Who Applied Systemic Treatment

3
Subscribe