Using fMRI-guided TMS to Increase Central Executive Function in Older Adults (MCI_Sub) (MCI_Sub)

January 8, 2021 updated by: Duke University

This is an administrative supplement to an existing project "Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults: NCT02767323" This award allows extending our existing fMRI-TMS paradigm to patients with a prodromal form of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) known as amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and investigate the role of brain health factors in mediating the TMS-related memory performance benefits associated with communication between a network of frontoparietal brain regions in these populations.

The focus on focal neurostimulation at only a single site represents a fundamental gap in the approach of memory-based neurostimulation therapies. Neurostimulation affects multiple sites within a cortical network, but these global effects have not been used as targets for stimulation because of limited knowledge about what influence these localized sites have on global changes in brain state. To address this problem, multimodal neuroimaging tools and network modeling approaches developed though the parent U01 project will be used, to demonstrate how focal neurostimulation improves the efficacy of TMS for enhancing memory function. These goals will be addressed in the Administrative Supplement under our two specific aims. First, network-guided TMS will be applied to optimize memory success based in the frontoparietal network (FPN) in a new group of MCI patients. A new form of TMS targeting that involves modeling of the global network to understand how the controllability of a stimulation site evokes changes in widespread brain networks will be tested. Second, structural and functional factors affecting the efficacy of individualized network-guided TMS will be identified to ameliorate deficits in MCI. By creating a multimodal model of neural deficits related to MCI, network-guided TMS will be adjusted to demonstrate how the MCI brain might compensate for these neural deficits. The parent U01 project has made foundational advances towards these goals, as we have demonstrated the ability of to selectively enhance and reduce working memory performance in healthy older adults. In the current Administrative Supplement this paradigm will be extended to a group of MCI participants in order to test the hypothesis that excitatory rTMS to the working memory network can provide positive outcomes for patients with pre-clinical AD. The proposed work will provide an important tool for studying the stability and controllability of network connectivity of memory states in the aging brain, as well as new information on the effectiveness of brain stimulation technologies as a therapeutic approach for cognitive decline.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English Speaking
  • willing to provide consent
  • signed HIPAA authorization
  • clinical consensus for MCI; and/or met inclusion criterial on MoCA, ApoE.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any I DSM IV disorder that is unstable or untreated
  • current or past history of substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine)
  • women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes
  • increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma greater than mild concussion (History of significant head trauma, including with loss of consciousness for ≥ 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for up to 24 hours following the event, or post-traumatic amnesia) in the past 10yrs or head injury received after age 65
  • Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; cerebral aneurysm , Dementia, Huntington chorea, multiple sclerosis
  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure (such as after large infarctions or trauma), or currently taking medication that are on the strong potential hazard list for rTMS.
  • Subjects taking medications with an ACB score of 3.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network, defined via network analysis.
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network
electrical sham coil applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network.
an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used
Active Comparator: rTMS over the DLPFC
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex showing the strongest fMRI activation.
excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS over the DLPFC
electrical sham coil applied over the DLPFC.
an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of one year
Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS.
Through study completion, an average of one year
Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Times (ms)
Time Frame: Through study completion an average of one year
Reaction times (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS
Through study completion an average of one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lawrence G Appelbaum, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00065334_1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on rTMS

3
Subscribe