A Pilot Study of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Preschool Cerebral Palsy After Botulism Toxin Injection

November 26, 2019 updated by: Changhua Christian Hospital

The Pilot Study of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy(CIMT) Intervention in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy After Botulism Toxin Injection in Preschool Education

To establish a pilot randomized, crossover study on applying 2 constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) interventions in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy after botulinum toxin injection during preschool education.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed to be a pilot study on the use of 4-week 2-hours/day and 2-week 4-hours/day CIMT interventions in children with hemiplegic CP after a BoNT-A injection in preschool education, and compared the effects and psychological stress of CP children relative to the 2 CIMT programs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

hemiplegic or quadriplegic CP children were under a regular rehabilitation program with BoNT-A injections. They were classified as Gross Motor Function Classification System level I and II, aged between 3 and 6 years old, with at least below average mentality, and were in mainstream preschool education; the extension of their hemiplegic wrist and metaphalangeal joint was greater than 10 degrees.

Exclusion Criteria:

Children were excluded if they (a) could not understand or cooperate with the CIMT program, (b) had joint contracture of an upper limb, and (c) could not actively extend their hemiplegic wrist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 4-week 2-hours/day CIMT program
a 4-week 2-hours/day constraint program, total 40 hours CIMT, in preschool education.
Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 CIMT programs (40 hours): a 2-week 4-hours/day CIMT program and a 4-week 2-hours/day CIMT program. One CIMT program was performed 1 month after a BoNT-A injection, and then the second program was implemented with the next injection.
Active Comparator: 2-week 4-hours/day CIMT program
one was a 2-week 4-hours/day constraint program, total 40 hours CIMT, in preschool education.
Participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 CIMT programs (40 hours): a 2-week 4-hours/day CIMT program and a 4-week 2-hours/day CIMT program. One CIMT program was performed 1 month after a BoNT-A injection, and then the second program was implemented with the next injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of Modified Ashworth Scale(MAS)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
change of spasticity, from 0 to 4, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
change of Visual-motor integration in Peabody-Developmental Motor Scales(PDMSⅡ)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
hand function, from 0 to 144, higher scores mean a better outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
Change of grasping in Peabody-Developmental Motor Scales(PDMSⅡ)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
hand function. from 0 to 52, higher scores mean a better outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT, and 4 months after CIMT
Change of Chinese Version of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory( PEDI-C)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
ADL, from 0 to 73, higher scores mean a better outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
Change of GAS(goal attainment scale)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
GAS included 2 playing goals and 2 self-care goals.The goals were decided by the occupation therapist, the preschool teacher and the major caregiver. From (-2) to 2, higher scores mean a better outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
Change of Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF)-Diagnostic scale of the Achenbach System of Empirically-Based Assessment (ASEBA)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
From 0 to 14, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
Change of Statistical Manual (DSM)-oriented scale of the Achenbach System of Empirically-Based Assessment (ASEBA)
Time Frame: 1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT
From 0 to 14, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
1 month after Botox injection, shortly after CIMT intervention, 2 months after CIMT and 4 months after CIMT

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on 40-hour constraint-induced movement therapy

3
Subscribe