A Comparison of Two Nebulisers for Sputum Induction (FLAME)

November 26, 2019 updated by: University of Nottingham

A Comparison of Two Nebulisers for Performing Sputum Induction to Assess Airway Inflammation

Sputum induction is considered a relatively non-invasive, reliable procedure, which can be utilised to characterise the inflammatory profile of the airways.

However, the procedure can be slightly uncomfortable for patients. This study aims to assess the differences in participants' tolerability of sputum induction, by comparing two different nebulisers when performing the procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single centre, crossover study to compare the use of two nebulisers in the sputum induction procedure. 54 participants with stable asthma or COPD will be recruited and will attend 2 visits, at least 48 hours apart. Differences in the quality and quantity of samples and the time taken to produce a sample will be described. The main purpose is to explore the optimum device to perform the procedure, whilst protecting the safety of participants and maximising their comfort.

If participants are unable to produce a sputum sample after completion of the induction procedure, physiotherapy techniques may be performed. This is an exploratory objective to establish whether these techniques may help in the event of unsuccessful procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have an ability to provide fully informed consent.
  • Have a diagnosis of asthma or COPD.
  • Male or female.
  • Age between 18 to 75 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a post bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second of less than 1 litre or less than 50 percent of the predicted value.
  • Have an exacerbation of asthma or COPD within the 30 days prior to the first visit.
  • Have a history or current evidence of an upper or lower respiratory infection, within the 30 days prior to the first visit.
  • Have any other clinically significant medical disease or uncontrolled concomitant disease, that is likely, in the opinion of the investigators to impact on the ability to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Omron
Omron group will undergo sputum induction with the Omron nebuliser at Visit 1, followed by the Akita Jet nebuliser at Visit 2.
The Omron Ultrasonic nebuliser dispenses sterile saline from a medication cup as an aerosol, which is inhaled.
The Akita Jet Inhalation System is a breath actuated nebuliser, which works with a positive pressure.
Active Comparator: Akita
Akita group will undergo sputum induction with the Akita Jet nebuliser at Visit 1, followed by the Omron nebuliser at Visit 2.
The Omron Ultrasonic nebuliser dispenses sterile saline from a medication cup as an aerosol, which is inhaled.
The Akita Jet Inhalation System is a breath actuated nebuliser, which works with a positive pressure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The tolerability to sputum induction test
Time Frame: During the visit, after each cycle of nebulisation (each 5 minutes)
Checking discomfort degree due to inhalation of hypertonic saline assessed by a visual analogue scale (0 to 10)
During the visit, after each cycle of nebulisation (each 5 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spirometry
Time Frame: During the visit, up to 4 hours
Measurement of lung function (FEV1 and FEV1%pred)
During the visit, up to 4 hours
Borg Scale
Time Frame: During the visit, up to 4 hours
Measurement of dyspnoea levels
During the visit, up to 4 hours
The quality of sputum samples
Time Frame: During the processing time, 2 hours
The analysis of squamous contamination in the sample (if >40%), viability (>65% of life cells) and quality of slide for differential cells count
During the processing time, 2 hours
The quantity of sputum samples
Time Frame: During the visit, up to 4 hours
How much sputum sample was produced of sufficient quality for processing
During the visit, up to 4 hours
Time to produce sample
Time Frame: During the visit, up to 30 minutes
The time in minutes required to produce a sputum sample sufficient for processing
During the visit, up to 30 minutes
Saline quantity
Time Frame: During the visit, up to 30 minutes
The amount of sterile saline required to produce a sputum sample sufficient for processing
During the visit, up to 30 minutes
Influence of Physiotherapy techniques
Time Frame: During the study visit, up to 5 minutes
The influence of manual vibrations and Huff cough in producing a sputum sample after unsuccessful induction attempts
During the study visit, up to 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Professor Tim W Harrison, MBBS, BSc, MD, MSc, Professor and Honorary Consultant, University of Nottingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Omron NE-U17 Ultrasonic nebuliser

3
Subscribe