Cognitive Stimulation for Elderly Bipolar Patients (TONIC)

February 28, 2024 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis

Evaluation of Cognitive Stimulation on Dysexecutive Residual Symptoms in Bipolar Patients Over 65 Years of Age

Age is a major risk factor for the development of cognitive disorders and neurodegenerative pathologies. Cognitive disorders during the phases of bipolar disease are known to exist, and alterations increase significantly after the age of 65. Drug treatments seem to have only a limited effect. A cognitive stimulation program has proven his benefit to patients over 65 with neurodegenerative diseases (Israel, 2004). We propose to evaluate this cognitive stimulation program that we have adapted to bipolar disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bipolar disorders, which belong to the category of mood disorders, are the 6th leading cause of disability in the world. Cognitive disorders are known to exist during the phases of bipolar disease, and alterations increase significantly after the age of 65. Recent studies have shown that attention, memory and executive function impairments are the main causes of cognitive disorders. Residual symptoms have a significant impact on the risk of relapse into bipolar disorder and on quality of life. Cognitive stimulation (CS) is a pedagogical approach based on the idea that cognitive skills contribute to personal development in the same way as psychological and social factors. This study aims at assessing a cognitive stimulation program initially developed for patients with neurodegenerative diseases, and adapted to bipolar disease. This program will be compared to the usual practice consisting in consultation with psychiatrist and sometimes in intervention of home nurses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • La Rochelle, France
        • Recruiting
        • Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
        • Contact:
          • Pascale Puzos, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cécile DUFRESNE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Damien CLUS
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edouard BARUCQ
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Louise LARROQUE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marion COULON
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emmanuelle TEYSSEDRE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie DEVAUCHELLE
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Caroline DURAND

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Pre-Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 65 years old
  • Diagnosis of bipolar illness for more than 10 years
  • Euthymic phase
  • Understands and speaks French
  • Free, informed and express consent

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild to moderate neuro-cognitive impairments (MMS Test : 16 ≤ score < 26)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Illiteracy
  • Patient participating in other therapeutic workshops (e. g. psycho-geriatric day hospital care, etc.)
  • Persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
  • Persons of full age who are subject to a legal protection measure
  • Persons unable to consent
  • Persons who are not members of or beneficiaries of a social security scheme
  • Patient's refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TONIC

The cognitive stimulation sessions are carried out using Liliane Israël's "TRAIN YOUR MEMORY" software, and are divided into two parts: the first part is essentially cognitive and the second relates to the daily life of the Bipolar patient.

This training method consists of combining two means of intervention, pedagogical action and psychotherapeutic effect. It aims to stimulate, develop and strengthen the basic mechanisms underlying memory phenomena (sensory acuity, attention, associations, structuring, executive functions, spatial and temporal landmarks, associative recruitment). It is presented in the form of exercises divided into eight modules.

Patients participate in one session per week according to the following schedule:

  • 2 sensory stimulation sessions: identify sensations, emotions, how to manage them.
  • 2 sessions on association, verbal fluency, and imagination: language as a tool for expression in the face of illness.
  • 2 voluntary attention sessions: improve daily attention.
  • 2 sessions of intellectual structuring: stimulating and maintaining memory, carrying out external activities.
  • 2 sessions of structuring through language: impact on social life.
  • 2 sessions stimulating the temporal and spatial landmarks: agenda, daily trips.
No Intervention: Control
The usual practice consists of interviews with the psychiatrist with the possibility of home visits by the nurse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score at the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
The FAB assesses conceptualization (category responses, such as "in what way are a banana and an orange are alike?"), lexical fluency, programming or motor series (Luria), sensitivity to interference (conflicting instructions, such as "tap twice when I tap once"), inhibitory control (Go/No-Go), and environmental autonomy (prehension behavior, such as "do not take my hands")
at 3 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score at FAB
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
Scores between the 3-month and 6-month evaluation will determine whether executive analysis functions have been maintained
at 6 months after inclusion
Number of patients with a positive difference between the scores on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (QAF)
Time Frame: at inclusion
The QAF allows to quickly assess a patient's functional capacity and to identify a functional decline in the patient with a mild neurocognitive disorder, Alzheimer's disease or other neurocognitive disorder.
at inclusion
Number of patients with a positive difference between the scores on the Functional Activities Questionnaire (QAF)
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
A positive difference in scores reflects an improvement in patient autonomy
at 6 months after inclusion
Score at delayed matching-to-sample (DMS48)
Time Frame: at inclusion
The DMS48 is a test of visual recognition memory test
at inclusion
Score at DMS48
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
The DMS48 is a test of visual recognition memory test
at 3 months after inclusion
Time in minutes at the Trail Making Test A (TMTA)
Time Frame: at inclusion
Evaluation of speed of processing.
at inclusion
Time in minutes at the Trail Making Test A
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
Evaluation of speed of processing.
at 3 months after inclusion
Number of errors at Trail Making Test B (TMTB)
Time Frame: at inclusion
Evaluation of mental flexibility
at inclusion
Number of errors at Trail Making Test B (TMTB)
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
Evaluation of mental flexibility
at 3 months after inclusion
Score at ISAAC test
Time Frame: at inclusion
Measures fluence
at inclusion
Score at ISAAC test
Time Frame: at 3 months after inclusion
Measures fluence
at 3 months after inclusion
Score at Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MMS)
Time Frame: at inclusion
Assessment for detecting cognitive impairment
at inclusion
Score at Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MMS)
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
Assessment for detecting cognitive impairment
at 6 months after inclusion
Score at the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: at inclusion
Evaluation of patient thymic state
at inclusion
Score at the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
Evaluation of patient thymic state
at 6 months after inclusion
Interference score at the Stroop test
Time Frame: at inclusion
Evaluation of selective attention
at inclusion
Interference score at the Stroop test
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
Evaluation of selective attention
at 6 months after inclusion
Number of hospitalization due to relapse
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
hospitalization due to relapse
at 6 months after inclusion
Score at Zarit scale (caregiver)
Time Frame: at inclusion
Identification of suffering or exhaustion, anxiety and/or depressive disorder(s), sleep disorder(s), etc. in the caregiver
at inclusion
Score at Zarit scale (caregiver)
Time Frame: at 6 months after inclusion
Identification of suffering or exhaustion, anxiety and/or depressive disorder(s), sleep disorder(s), etc. in the caregiver
at 6 months after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pascale Puzos, MD, Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 3, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available with publication. A Digital Object Identifier will be used.

Keyword are bipolar disorder, aged, cognitive dysfunction, cognitive Remediation.

The only available version will be the locked database. With the exception of dates, all data will be made available. Dates will only be collected to verify the quality of the clinical trial execution. They do not add to the clinical question, and may be a means of indirectly identifying patients. The database will be made available through Mendeley Data.

Medical Subject Headings (MESH) terms will be used to describe clinical data. Psychological test references will be provided in the publication. International standard unit will be used. The data will be made available to the community of scientists and clinicians interested in bipolar disorder.

Data will be made available with the free access to the publication for 15 years.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available with publication and up to 15 years after the end of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

On Mendeley repository A Digital Object Identifier will be provided

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on cognitive stimulation

3
Subscribe