CORonaRy Angiography and intErventions Via Distal vs Proximal aCcess (CORRECT Radial)

August 2, 2021 updated by: Dr. med. Karsten Schenke

CORRECT RADIAL RCT: CORonaRy Angiography and intErventions Via Distal vs Proximal aCcess - a Randomized Trial of Different Radial Puncture Sites

The objective of the study is to determine that a coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via a distal puncture of the radial artery (distal transradial access, dTRA) leads to a lower rate of radial artery occlusion (RAO) while also showing that it has a similar success rate when compared to the traditional proximal (proximal transradial access, pTRA) puncture site.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiac catheterization is one of the most common invasive procedures worldwide. After demonstrating the superiority of the radial access over the femoral arterial approach, the radial artery puncture has become the first choice for elective and emergency coronary interventions. In addition to the often chosen access on the inside of the forearm, the course of the radial artery also allows a puncture further distal on the back of the hand. In the anatomical snuffbox, the diameter is still sufficient for the introduction of the usual sheath, however, the thrombogenic puncture at the proximal radial segment is avoided and a hemostasis by compression over the scaphoid is simplified.

This study is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter study to systematically compare primary success rates and potential complications after distal transradial coronary angiography or coronary intervention versus proximal radial artery puncture over the wrist. Both puncture routes are well established in clinical routine and are used in both elective and emergency cardiac catheterization in the centers involved and worldwide. Systematic comparisons exist so far only in small series, but randomized and prospective data would be urgently needed in the frequent application. Both puncture sites are only 4-8 cm apart, so that many risks of a transradial examination (vascular injury and / or closure, perforation, spasm) are in principle common to both access sites.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the potential benefits of radial artery puncture in the back of the hand due to a reduced rate of chronic vascular occlusion compared to over the wrist, as well as complications (bleeding or nerve damage) and subjective tolerability ( Pain) systematically.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 22291
        • Recruiting
        • Asklepios Klinik Barmbek
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gerian Groenefeld, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Achim Viertel, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karsten Schenke, MD
    • Bavaria
      • Erding, Bavaria, Germany, 85435
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Klinikum Landkreis Erding
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nader Joghetaei, MD
    • NRW
      • Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany, 40953
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf GmbH
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rostyslav Prog, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written consent to participate in the study
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Indication for coronary angiography or coronary intervention
  • Palpable pulse of the proximal and distal radial artery on one or both arms

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability (according to the criteria of cardiogenic shock: Hf> 120 / min and RR syst <90 mmHg)
  • Intubated patients
  • Sonographic evidence of occlusion of both radial arteries
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients that are currently or have within the last 30 days participated in a clinical trial
  • Primarily planned bilateral radial access; e.g. in the context of a CTO recanalization
  • Patients who are in a dependency / employment/ relationship with the study doctor or center
  • Patients with bilateral hand or arm misalignment / paresis that makes a radial Access impossible
  • Patients who do not speak German or who are unable to understand the nature, significance or scope of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Forearm radial access
Patients who undergo coronary angiography or intervention by forearm radial artery access
After puncture of the radial artery in either the area of the anatomical snuffbox or the lower forearm following modified Seldinger technique a sheath will be advanced and a CAG or PCI will be performed. After the procedure is finished the sheath will be withdrawn and a standard closure device will be applied to achieve hemostasis. The choice of the patients side, the sheath, the catheters and the closing device will be at the discretion of the interventionalist.
Experimental: Distal radial access
Patients who undergo coronary angiography or intervention by accessing the distal radial artery in the area of the anatomical snuff-box
After puncture of the radial artery in either the area of the anatomical snuffbox or the lower forearm following modified Seldinger technique a sheath will be advanced and a CAG or PCI will be performed. After the procedure is finished the sheath will be withdrawn and a standard closure device will be applied to achieve hemostasis. The choice of the patients side, the sheath, the catheters and the closing device will be at the discretion of the interventionalist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lower rate of forearm radial artery occlusion (RAO)
Time Frame: 30 days
Use of color doppler ultrasound to assess the patency of the radial artery used in the index procedure.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Puncture success rate of the randomized puncture site
Time Frame: During the procedure
Comparison of the rate of successful Insertion of the sheath in each group
During the procedure
Access cross over rate
Time Frame: During the procedure
Comparison of the rate of access site cross over in each group to complete the planned procedure
During the procedure
Duration of puncture
Time Frame: During the procedure
Exact measurement of the duration of the puncture in seconds
During the procedure
Hematoma, bleeding and other complications
Time Frame: 48 hours
Registration of complications associated with the procedure, hematoma size, bleeding according to the BARC Score
48 hours
Use of standard questionaire to assess pain
Time Frame: 30 days
Visual analog scale is used to assess pain
30 days
Incidence of vasospasm
Time Frame: during the procedure
The incidence of vasospasm that necessitates additional medication or Forces Access site cross over is registered
during the procedure
Use of standard questionaire to assess Hand function
Time Frame: 30 days
QuickDASH questionaire is used to assess Hand function
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karsten Schenke, MD, Asklepios Klinik Bambek Hamburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Use of radial artery for access for a coronary angiography or intervention

3
Subscribe