Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cervical Deformity: A Multi-Center Study 2.0 (PCD 2)

Prospective Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Surgical Treatment for Cervical Deformity: A Multi-Center Study 2.0

Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized study to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated patients with adult cervical spinal deformity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adult cervical deformity (ACD) is an uncommon but potentially severely debilitating condition with a broad range of causes that include but are not limited to spondylosis, inflammatory arthropathy, trauma, infection, iatrogenic, neoplastic, congenital, and neuromuscular processes. In general, sagittal plane deformities typically produce kyphosis, and coronal plane deformities result in scoliosis. Cervical kyphotic deformities are most commonly encountered in the setting of prior surgical destabilization, while cervical scoliosis is most commonly associated with congenital and neuromuscular conditions.

Cervical kyphosis may be progressive and can result in neurological symptoms, including myelopathy. The most severe forms, such as those associated with spondylotic arthropathies, can produce "chin-on-chest" deformity, which can compromise horizontal gaze, swallowing, and breathing. Even in the absence of these conditions, cervical deformity is often associated with pain and functional disability. For adult thoracolumbar deformities, substantial efforts have been made to characterize clinical presentations, develop standardized classification systems, define optimal treatment approaches, describes operative complication rates, and to present structured clinical outcomes. However, despite the potential for profound impact of cervical deformity on function and health-related quality of life, there remains a remarkable paucity of high-quality studies that address these complex conditions.

Health professionals providing nonoperative and surgical care for these patients are left to make important treatment decisions based on a combination of personal experience, anecdotal experience of colleagues and experts, and relatively small, often single-surgeon or single-center, retrospective case reports or case series in the literature. Recent systematic reviews have high-lighted the lack of studies relevant to cervical deformity and have failed to identify any prospective studies.

The International Spine Study Group (ISSG) consists of orthopedic and neurological spine surgeons with a practice emphasis on spinal deformity patients. These surgeons, from 12 busy surgical centers, meet regularly to design and perform clinical research focused on spinal deformity, including successful prospective enrollment of more than 1,000 adult thoracolumbar deformity patients into the ISSG database. This group has a proven track record and regularly presents a substantial number of abstracts to the major spine meetings and has an extensive publication record.

The ISSG members have currently enrolled more than 150 patients into the first generation prospective cervical deformity database and have produced approximately 50 abstracts and more than 25 manuscripts to date with the resulting data. The group has learned extensively from this first-generation database, but there is much yet to learn, as the literature remains relatively sparse on the topic of adult cervical deformity. Based on what we have learned from the first generation database; we have substantially modified the inclusion criteria for this second generation database. In addition, several new outcomes measures and functional assessments will be collected at baseline and follow-up intervals as part of this current proposal.

The resources of the ISSG offer an unprecedented opportunity to create a prospectively collected multicenter database of cervical deformity patients that includes standardized health-related quality of life measures at baseline and regular follow-up, clinical and surgical parameters, and complications. The database and questionnaires have been carefully redesigned based on what we have learned in order to better collect data that will help to clarify many of the unresolved issues that are important for the care of cervical deformity patients. This project has substantial potential to significantly impact the field of cervical deformity and the care of deformity patients beyond what we have already been able to accomplish based on the first generation cervical deformity database. Herein we propose the second iteration for this project that promises to further advance our evolving understanding of these complex deformities.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Recruiting
        • Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert Eastlack, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gregory Mundis, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Active, not recruiting
        • University of California Davis, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Recruiting
        • University of California-San Francisco Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Ames, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vedat Deviren, MD
        • Contact:
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80128
        • Recruiting
        • Denver International Spine Center, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children and Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shay Bess, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Recruiting
        • Rush University, Department of Neurosurgery
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vince Traynelis, MD
        • Contact:
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Recruiting
        • University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Douglas Burton, MD
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • Recruiting
        • Leatherman Spine Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeffrey Gum, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University, Department of Neurological Surgery
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Khaled Kebaish, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sang Lee, MD
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Completed
        • University of Michigan, Department of Neurosurgery
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Recruiting
        • Washington University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Munish Gupta, MD
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel K Riew, MD
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Recruiting
        • New York University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Peter Passias, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Themistocles Protopsaltis, MD
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Han Jo Kim, MD
        • Contact:
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Recruiting
        • Duke University Health System
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Khoi Than
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher I Shaffrey, MD
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15219
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas Buell, MD
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75243
        • Recruiting
        • Medical City Spine Hospital - Southwest Scoliosis Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Richard Hostin, MD
        • Contact:
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Justin Smith, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Spine Surgeon Clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years old at time of treatment
  • Diagnosis of cervical deformity- must meet one or more of the following criteria:

    • C2-C7 sagittal kyphosis (Cobb > 15 degrees)
    • T1S-CL > 35o
    • Segmental cervical kyphosis > 10 degrees between any 2 vertebra between C2-T1 or > 15 degrees across any 3 vertebra between C2-T1
    • Cervical scoliosis > 10 degrees (Cobb angle must include end vertebra within the cervical spine)
    • C2-C7 SVA > 4cm
    • McGregor's slope > 20 degrees or CBVA > 25 degrees
  • Plan for surgical correction of cervical deformity in the next 6 months
  • Willing to provide consent and complete study forms at baseline and follow-up intervals

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active spine tumor or infection
  • Deformity due to acute trauma
  • Unwilling to provide consent or to complete study forms
  • Prisoner
  • Pregnant or immediate plans to get pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Operative

Inclusion criteria:

  1. ≥18 years old at time of treatment
  2. Diagnosis of cervical deformity- must meet one or more of the following criteria:

    • C2-C7 sagittal kyphosis (Cobb > 15o)
    • T1S-CL > 35o
    • Segmental cervical kyphosis > 10o between any 2 vertebra between C2-T1 or > 15o across any 3 vertebra between C2-T1
    • Cervical scoliosis > 10o (Cobb angle must include end vertebra within the cervical spine)
    • C2-C7 SVA > 4cm
    • McGregor's slope > 20 degrees or CBVA > 25 degrees
  3. Plan for surgical correction of cervical deformity in the next 6 months
Surgical interventions will be patient specified by treating surgeon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Headaches
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Self-reported pain in Head where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Neck
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Self-reported pain in Neck where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Upper extremity
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Self-reported pain in Arms where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Lower extremity
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Self-reported pain in Legs where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Pain Numeric rating scale (NRS) - Back
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Self-reported pain in Back where 0=no pain/10=severe pain
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient reported neck disability tool
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient reported outcome
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Anxiety
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Pain Interference
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Function
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (Role)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Social Satisfaction (DSA)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Computer adaptive PROs
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Spine Radiographs
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Radiographic parameters (Cervical lordosis, Kyphosis, Scoliosis; Global balance in coronal and sagittal planes of the spine; pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, tilt, slope) and bony fusion status.
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Patient reported outcome measuring functional status using scale of 0 to 18. The higher the score, the less disability.
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EAT-10
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Measures swallowing difficulties as reported by the patient.
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10)
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Measures voice handicap as reported by the patient.
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Adverse evnts
Time Frame: 3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year post treatment
Any adverse events occurring & meeting study established reporting criteria
3 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year post treatment
Edmonton Frail Scale
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Frailty scale from 0 to 17 where the higher the score the more frail the patient
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
CHSF Frail Scale
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Clinical Frailty Scale from 1 to 9 where the higher the score, the more frail the patient
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
Dynamometer Hand Grip Strength test
Time Frame: Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up
With patient seated, patient will squeeze dynamometer as hard as he/she can with each hand.
Change from Preop to 3 months, 6 months and 1, 2, 5 & 10 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Justin Smith, MD, University of Virginia, Department of Neurosurgery
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Ames, MD, University of California, San Francisco, Department on Neurosurgery
  • Principal Investigator: Christopher I Shaffrey, MD, Duke University, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2131

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Deformity

Clinical Trials on Surgical intervention

3
Subscribe