Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity of Children With Hemiparesis

June 16, 2021 updated by: faizan kashoo, PT, Majmaah University

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Augmented With Activities in Virtual Reality on Functional Recovery of the Upper Extremity of Children With Hemiparesis

Purpose: The aim of the study is to determine the combined effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and activities in virtual reality on the functional recovery of the upper extremity function of the children with hemiparesis. Subjects: Forty children with infantile stroke with age group between (6-12 years) will be divided into two groups, the experimental group will receive tDCS plus VR while the control group will receive sham tDCS plus VR. All the children will receive tDCS for 30minutes with 1.5 mA intensity over the dominant motor cortex. Both groups will be treated for three times a week for 6 weeks. Instrumentation: The the Fugl-Meyer assessment, motricity index, and Modified Barthel index will be used to assess the dependent variables after the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One in 4000 full-term infants develops arterial ischemic stroke at the time of birth.5 These children are commonly called an infantile stroke, infantile hemiplegia, perinatal stroke, and congenital hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Epileptic seizures are common in 24-45 % of children suffering from an infantile stroke within a month.6 Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is the novel method of delivering therapeutic currents to the brain for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment 7. There is an exponential increase in researches on the effect of NIBS on cognitive deficits. The NIBS has proven to cause neural modulation at the cortical level8. The effect of stimulation is either increased or decreased in neuronal activity, depending on the anodal and cathodal stimulation, firing rate, and period of the activation or inhibition910. There are two types of NIBS techniques safely practiced among humans, these are, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tCDS)11. tCMS uses a weak magnetic field that transforms into beneficial currents into the brain for diagnostic (Single-pulse tCMS) or treatment purposes (repetitive tCMS). The inhibitory or excitatory cortical effects are achieved by decreasing or increasing the frequency and duration of tCMS 12. tCDS involves the use of weak direct or alternating current applied on the scalp via electrodes for the purpose of neural modulation13. The most popular form of tCDS device is a battery-operated stimulator capable of producing direct current ranging from 0.5-2.0 mA14. Neural modulation is achieved by altering the resting membrane potential. The anode causes increased excitability due to its depolarizing effect whereas the cathode electrode causes inhibition due to the hyperpolarization effect14.

Virtual reality (KVR) is the use of a computer interface involving upper limb activity in pediatric rehabilitation. VR creates an artificial environment, presented to the user through appropriate sensory stimulations. Participants use the motion sensor mounted on the paretic hand to interact with the virtual environment. The participants will receive visual and auditory feedback. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the combined effect of virtual reality activities and tDCS on upper limb activity in children with hemiparesis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 11952
        • Faizan Kashoo
    • Riyadh
      • Riyad, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 15341
        • Faizan Kashoo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The congenital stroke survivors with mild to moderate degree of upper limb disability on the Brunnstrom recovery scale16. The scores from 3-4 are considered moderate and 5-6 as a mild degree of upper-limb disability.
  2. Age 5-12 years.
  3. Able to understand simple commands.
  4. Normal vision or with corrected glass

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemorrhage in the subarachnoid space
  2. Aphasia
  3. Neurosurgery of brain
  4. Seizures in the past 12 months.
  5. On medication for seizures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group

Transcranial direct stimulation + virtual related group:

Brain stimulator v3.0 will be used to deliver 1.5 mA current over the scalp corresponding to the primary motor cortex. The current will be delivered via two surface electrodes 5 × 5 cm placed on the scalp Virtual reality (KVR) is the use of a computer interface involving upper limb activity in pediatric rehabilitation. VR creates an artificial environment, presented to the user through appropriate sensory stimulations.

Brain stimulator v3.0 will be used to deliver 1.5 mA current over the scalp corresponding to the primary motor cortex. The current will be delivered via two surface electrodes 5 × 5 cm placed on the scalp, validated by the previous research
Sham Comparator: Control group
Sham Transcranial direct stimulation Group + virtual related group; The sham set-up will follow a similar protocol as the experimental group but the intensity of the current will be ceased after 30 seconds of stimulation. Participants in the Sham group will feel the identical sensation as the experimental group and will be unable to differentiate between actual and sham tDCS such procedure is validated in earlier studies.
The sham set-up will follow a similar protocol as the experimental group but the intensity of the current will be ceased after 30 seconds of stimulation. Participants in the Sham group will feel the identical sensation as the experimental group and will be unable to differentiate between actual and sham tDCS such procedure is validated in earlier studies

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline and post- intervention Fugl-Meyer motor assessment
Time Frame: 8 Months
The Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FM) will be the primary outcome measure. The scale is a reliable and valid measure for upper limb impairment among stroke patients19. The score ranges from 0-66, score less than 18 are considered severe to moderate functional impairment. The scale takes 20 minutes to complete.
8 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beiseline and post- intervention Motricity Index
Time Frame: 8 Months
: Motricity Index (MI) upper limb items will be used to evaluate upper limb strength. The tool is found valid and reliable20 in scoring upper limb strength in stroke patients.
8 Months
Baseline and post- intervention Modified Barthel Index
Time Frame: 8 Months
Modified Barthel Index (BI) is a valid tool21 to measure functional disability in neurological disability to evaluate the functional disability. The scale will take 45 minutes to administer.
8 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared by the authors upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy Infantile

Clinical Trials on Brain stimulator v3.0

3
Subscribe