Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen is Efficient to Treat an Acute Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Disc Herniation

February 17, 2020 updated by: Sinisa Poznic, General Hospital Sveti Duh

Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Feasibility of a New Protocol for Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain and Sciatica From Lumbar Radiculopathy and Intervertebral Disc Herniation: Non-invasive Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen

Efficiency of the conservative mechanical lumbosacral nerve root decompression, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, in the case of acute lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-invasive Position-Induced Opening of the Intervertebral Foramen in sidelying position, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, was used in the case of acute lumbosacral radiculopathy.

20 examinees were split into two groups, 10 in the experimental and 10 in the control group. Experimental group was given positional opening of the intervert. foramen, together with pharmacological treatment - steroid antiinflammatory drug - dexamethasone, nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs and pain killers while control group was given just the same pharmacological treatment and recommended rest.

Measured dependent variables were:

  1. Visual analogue pain scale (VAS) for the low back and radiculopathy, separately
  2. Straight leg raise in supine position - nerve mobility test
  3. EuroQol questionnaire - general health condition questionnaire
  4. Oswestry questionnaire - activities of daily living (ADL) specific questionnaire for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathies Inclusive criteria were: Age between 20 - 60, lumbar disc herniation recognized by the MRI, lumbosacral radiculopathy with symptoms such as radicular pain, sensation dysfunctions or motor dysfunctions, recognized by electromyography (EMG) diagnostics.

Exclusive criteria: age more than 60, degenerative lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, vertebra fractures, tumours.

Conclusion: Physiotherapy with a positional, mechanical decompression of the compressed lumbosacral nerve root, as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment, is proved to be efficient with the lumbosacral radiculopathy. It is recommended to be applied since the first day of a patient admittance in the hospital if there is a position that can reduce the pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 20 - 60
  2. Lumbar disc herniation proved by MRI
  3. Lumbosacral radiculopathy with symptoms of radicular pain, sensation dysfunction, and motor dysfunction proved by EMG diagnostics.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age older than 60
  2. Degenerative lumbar stenosis
  3. Spondylolisthesis
  4. Vertebrae fractures
  5. Tumor metastasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental
Physiotherapeutic non-invasive position-induced opening of the intervertebral foramen and pharmacological treatment with steroid antiinflammatory drugs - dexamethasone, nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs and pain killers - tramadol.
Opening of the mechanical interface of the nerve root, neurodynamics
Active Comparator: Control group
Pharmacological treatment with steroid antiinflammatory drugs - dexamethasone, nonsteroid antiinflammatory drugs and pain killers - tramadol.
Opening of the mechanical interface of the nerve root, neurodynamics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain scale for low back pain (LBP) Visual analogue scale for radiculopathy
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain subjectively reported value by Visual Analogic Scale compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
Pain descriptor
Change from baseline pain subjectively reported value by Visual Analogic Scale compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
Straight leg raise
Time Frame: Change from baseline nerve mobility objectively reported value by straight leg raise compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
Nerve mobility test for lower lumbar nerve roots and n. ischiadicus
Change from baseline nerve mobility objectively reported value by straight leg raise compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
EuroQol questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline general health condition subjectively reported value by EuroQol questionnaire compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
General health condition questionnaire
Change from baseline general health condition subjectively reported value by EuroQol questionnaire compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
Oswestry questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline activity of daily living specific questionnaire for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy subjectively reported value by Oswestry questionnaire compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)
ADLs specific questionnaire for LBP and lumbosacral radiculopathy
Change from baseline activity of daily living specific questionnaire for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy subjectively reported value by Oswestry questionnaire compared to same values at discharge (mean value 8 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Anita Marcinko Budincevic, Clinic of Neurology, Sveti Duh Clinical Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Physiotherapeutic, non-invasive position-induced opening of the intervertebral foramen

3
Subscribe