Fatigue and Physical Performance During Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PROMOD)

November 13, 2023 updated by: 5 Santé

Impact of Fatigue on Physical Performance During a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Patients With COPD

Patients with COPD benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), but a ceiling effect of performance (ie. absence of additional exercise tolerance increase) is observed in 80% of patients from only 20 sessions. An imbalance between intensity, duration and frequency of PR sessions, leading to fatigue development in the course of the PR, could explain this ceiling effect. However, previous studies having evaluated the impact of a PR program on fatigue scores reported either a decrease or no changing, but never an increase. To date, no study has evaluated intermediate variations of fatigue score during a PR program, but were limited to a pre-post PR assessment. Therefore, fatigue fluctuations during PR are unknown. Furthermore, most studies had only unidimensional fatigue assessment. Since fatigue is a multifactorial and a multidimensional process, it cannot be accurately estimated through a unique assessment. Given that most of COPD patients do not increase their exercise tolerance from 20 PR sessions, the investigators hypothesize a significant increase of multidimensional fatigue score between the 1st and the 20th PR session during an inpatient rehabilitation program lasting 4 weeks (40 sessions).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Exercise tolerance is an important predictor of health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A reduced 6-min walking distance is associated with an increased mortality risk in these patients. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is one of the most efficient strategy to counterac this effect. Patients improving their exercise tolerance after a PR program have a reduced mortality risk. However, exercise tolerance improvement is not systematic after PR, since up to 1/3 of patients do not respond to the intervention. In addition, PR's effects are limited, with a ceiling effect of performance observed in 80% of patients from 20 sessions.

Fatigue could be one candidate to explain the ceiling effect of physical performance during PR. From a theoritical point of view, national and international guidelines on PR have continuously broadened PR interventions for the last 20 years, by progressively introducing in addition to endurance training, resistance training of the lower and then the upper limbs, electrical stimulation, stretching, respiratory muscle training... From a practical point of view, several patients complain of fatigue during PR. However, previous studies having evaluated the impact of a PR program on fatigue scores reported either a decrease or no changing, but never an increase. To date, no study has evaluated intermediate variations of fatigue score during a PR program, but were limited to a pre-post PR assessment. Therefore, fatigue fluctuations during PR are unknown. Furthermore, most studies had only unidimensional fatigue assessment. Since fatigue is a multifactorial and a multidimensional process, it cannot be accurately estimated through a unique assessment. Mutdimensional questionnaires and complementary indicators such as heart rate variability or visuomotor reaction time could be introduced.

Given that most of COPD patients do not increase their exercise tolerance from 20 PR sessions, the investigators hypothesize a significant increase of multidimensional fatigue score between the 1st and the 20th PR session during an inpatient rehabilitation program lasting 4 weeks (40 sessions).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lodeve, France, 34700
        • Clinique du Souffle La Vallonie
      • Osséja, France, 66340
        • Clinique du Souffle la Solane
      • Riom-es-Montagnes, France, 15400
        • Clinique du Souffle Les Clarines

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

38 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admited for an inpatient PR program at one of the three following pulmonary rehabilitation center will be consecutively recruiting:

  • Clinique du Souffle La Vallonie (Lodève, France)
  • Clinique du Souffle La Solane (Osseja, France)
  • Clinique du Souffle Les Clarines (Riom-es-Montagnes, France)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients admited for a 4-weeks inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • With a confirmed diagnosis of COPD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or unstable heart disease
  • Orthopedic, neurologic or psychatric comorbities
  • Recent exacerbation (<4 weeks)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation
Multidisciplinary inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program lasting 4 weeks (40 sessions, 2 sessions per day, 5 days per week).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multidimensional fatigue score
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Change in total fatigue score measured with the MFI-20 questionnaire
Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-min walking distance
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Change in walking distance during a 6-min period over a corridor of 30m length
Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Change in SDNN and RMSSD indices of RR intervals during a 5-min resting period and at exercise during a 6-min walking test
Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Visuomotor reaction time
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Change in the mean of 15 reaction time in response to visual stimuli
Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Correlation between fatigue and physical performance
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program
Change in the strength of the correlation between indicators of fatigue (muldimensional score, heart rate variability, visuomotor reaction time) and 6-min walking distance
Baseline (T0), 1st week (T1), 2nd week (T2), 3rd week (T3) and 4th week (T4) of the PR program

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: During the 4 weeks of the PR program (continuous measurement)
Measurement of physical activity via a triaxial accelerometer
During the 4 weeks of the PR program (continuous measurement)
Daily subjective fatigue
Time Frame: Every morning of the 4 weeks PR program
Fatigue evaluated by the patient every morning with a visual analogic scale
Every morning of the 4 weeks PR program

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Nelly Heraud, PhD, Direction de la recherche et de l'innovation Santé, GCS CIPS, Korian, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

3
Subscribe