M-Health for Teen Substance Abuse and Mental Illness Pilot

March 28, 2022 updated by: Zachary W. Adams, Indiana University

M-Health for Teen Substance Abuse and Mental Illness: Component III

The study is exploring the ease and ability to integrate a mobile application in outpatient behavioral health treatment. There are two major aims to the study: 1) Determine feasibility and acceptability of integrating a mobile app into behavioral health treatment for adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders, and 2) identify initial signal of effect on engagement and/or treatment outcomes among youth who use the mobile app.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the trial will be to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology (rate of recruitment, retention at 4-month follow-up, study procedures) as well as estimates of effect on key variables (patient engagement, patient symptoms, use of e-tools, treatment efficiency) in preparation for future studies in this line evaluating the utility of the mobile app.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Adolescents:

  • Aged 14-17 years
  • Current substance use disorder (SUD)
  • Co-occurring mental health disorder
  • Treatment-seeking
  • English-speaking (Only English documents will be used throughout the course of this research study)

Exclusion Criteria for Adolescents:

  • Younger than 14 or older than 17
  • Endorsement of active suicidal or homicidal ideation
  • Active mania or psychosis
  • Significant cognitive disability, developmental delays, or pervasive developmental disability
  • No history of outpatient psychotherapy.

Inclusion Criteria for Providers

  • Clinician delivering outpatient dual diagnosis treatment (i.e., for co-occurring SUDs and mental health disorders)
  • Therapist with at least a Master's degree in a counseling related field

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Mobile App
Youth will be assigned to interact with a novel mobile application during a course of outpatient psychotherapy for substance use disorder(s) and co-occurring mental health disorder(s).
The Bright Path web-based mobile application is designed to target co-occurring problems, enhance patient treatment engagement, and contribute to lasting improvements in teens' mental health. The central hypothesis is that developmentally tailored mobile applications that incorporate evidence-based treatment principles can facilitate increased patient engagement in and between sessions, thus, improving the efficiency, efficacy, and reach of treatments for this highly vulnerable population.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of patients retained in study protocol
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Retention of >75% of adolescents through assessments measured by study participant enrollment records. The retention rate will be measured by the number of sessions attended.
4 months post-baseline
Provider satisfaction assessed by Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form (TEI-SF)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Providers express high satisfaction with e-tools per published norms on the TEI-SF. The Treatment Evaluation Inventory Short Form (TEI-SF) is a 9-item questionnaire that is rated on a 5-point scale. Scores range from 9 to 45 for each treatment with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the model.
4 months post-baseline
Adolescent satisfaction assessed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Adolescents express high satisfaction with e-tools per published norms. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8, an 8 question survey with ratings from 1 to 4 is used. Scores can range from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
4 months post-baseline
Patient Engagement assessed by the Child Improvement Rating Scale (CIRS)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Provider-rated youth engagement in treatment process.This will be assessed by the Child Involvement Rating Scale (CIRS) which is a 6 item questionnaire with each item being rated on a 6 item scale ranging from 0 to 5. The questionnaire contains 4 items assessing positive involvement and 2 items assessing negative involvement. The positive items are scored according to the selected scale value while the negative involvement items are reverse scored. Higher scores correspond to greater perceived patient involvement.
4 months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Symptoms measured by CRAFFT
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Providers record a decrease in SUD symptoms for patients participating in the study and treatment. The CRAFFT, a 6-item questionnaire in which every "yes" scores 1 point is used to measure substance abuse and dependence. A score of 2 or higher indicates a positive screening.
4 months post-baseline
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Symptoms assessed by the Drug Abuse Screening Test for Adolescents (DAST-20-A)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Providers record a decrease in SUD symptoms for patients participating in the study and treatment. The Drug Abuse Screening Test-20 Adolescent Version (DAST-20-A) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. Higher scores indicate a greater severity in substance use and can be broken down into the following ranges: 0 (n/a), 1-5 (low), 6-10 (intermediate, likely meets DSM criteria), 11-15 (substantial), 16-20 (severe).
4 months post-baseline
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms (If applicable)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Providers record a decrease in PTSD symptoms for patients participating in the study and treatment. The PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-5) is used for evaluation. The CPSS-5 is a 20-item symptom checklist in which symptom severity can be rated from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and can be broken down into the following ranges: 0-10 (minimal), 11-20 (mild), 21-40 (moderate), 41-60 (severe), 61-80 (very severe)
4 months post-baseline
Therapeutic alliance as measured by the Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children-Revised (TASC-R)
Time Frame: 4 months post-baseline
Providers record high therapeutic alliance per published norms. The TASC-R includes 12 items rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not true) to 4 (very much true), with item scores summed for a total, where higher scores correspond to higher therapeutic alliance.
4 months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zachary W Adams, PhD, Indiana University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Disorder

Clinical Trials on Mobile Application (working name: Bright Path)

3
Subscribe