Bringing Parkinson Care Back Home

April 3, 2023 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

SUMMARY

Rationale: For persons with Parkinson's disease (PD), medical decisions are based almost exclusively on periodic in-clinic evaluations by a neurologist or a nurse. For a variety of reasons, such "snapshots" are unable to capture the actual impact of PD on the patient's functioning in their own home environment. Outpatient evaluations cannot detect rare and typically domestic events, such as falls. In addition, episodic visits are not well suited to detect changes in important lifestyle issues, such as gradual declines in physical activity.

Objective: To objectively, continuously and accurately collect detailed information on (changes in) physical activity and fall patterns among patients with PD in daily life.

Study design: Observational cohort study in 200 patients with PD, with a 12 month follow-up period.

Study population: Patients with PD (n=200), with an increased fall risk (i.e. at least one fall within the last six months).

Intervention (if applicable): This study does not include an intervention. After a baseline assessment on demographics and PD symptoms, patients will use a remote monitoring system at home (a pendant falls detector) combined with an smartphone application aimed at falls self-reporting, and an application to report medication intake for 12 months. A similar set up (i.e.Vital@Home) has been previously tested on feasibility (Dossiernummer: 2017-3382). Additionally, patients will report sleep patterns through paper-based diaries.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameters are physical activity and number of falls. They are remotely registered by the pendant falls detector.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In this study, no invasive measurements will be performed. The participation is free of risks. Subjects could potentially benefit personally from participating in this study, as they can use the devices for free during the study and receive periodically feedback about physical activity and the occurrence of falls.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

200 patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease with an increased fall risk (i.e. who reported at least one fall in the last 6 months).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must confirm that they have been diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease by a neurologist (self-reported)
  • Age 18 or older
  • At least 1 fall incident in the previous 6 months. A fall is defined as any unexpected event that caused the person to unintentionally land on any lower surface (object, floor, or ground), regardless of any sustained injury (self-reported)
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice, and national and local regulation
  • Fluent in Dutch

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients receives advanced therapy for their Parkinson's disease (deep brain stimulation, duodopa pump, apomorphine pump);
  • The patients shows cognitive of psychiatric impairments that may hinder successful completion of the study protocol (as judged by the researcher running the recruitment).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Falls
Time Frame: Continuously over 12 months
Number of alls measured with wearable sensors
Continuously over 12 months
Physical activity
Time Frame: Continuously over 12 months
Minutes of physical activity performed during daily-life measured with wearable sensors
Continuously over 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity
Time Frame: Twice - baseline and after 12 months
LASA physical activity questionnaire, in which the higher the score the better
Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Walking capacity
Time Frame: Once - baseline
6-meter walking test, in which the higher the distance walked the better
Once - baseline
Falls
Time Frame: Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Falls history questionnaire
Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Functional lower extremity strength
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Five-times-sit-to-stand, in which the faster the task is completed the better
Once - baseline
Fear of falling
Time Frame: Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Falls Efficacy Scale International, with scores ranging from 16 to 64 points, in which the a higher score indicates worse fear of falling
Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Compliance
Time Frame: Continuously over 12 months
Number of days in which participants worn the device for more than 8 hours
Continuously over 12 months
Patients demographics
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Demographics questionnaire (age, gender, education, disease duration)
Once - baseline
Disease severity
Time Frame: Part III - once at baseline. Part I, II and IV - twice baseline and after 12 months
Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part I-IV, with scores ranging from 0 to 272, in which the higher the score the worse symptoms are.
Part III - once at baseline. Part I, II and IV - twice baseline and after 12 months
Disease status
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Hoehn & Yahr stadia, ranging from 0-5, in which the higher the worse the disease status is.
Once - baseline
Medication
Time Frame: Continuously over 12 months
Medication intake diary
Continuously over 12 months
Balance - I
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Mini-BESTest, ranging from 0 to 28, in which the higher the score the better the balance
Once - baseline
Balance - II
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Single leg stance test
Once - baseline
Freezing of gait - I
Time Frame: Twice - baseline and after 12 months
New freezing of gait questionnaire, ranging from 0 to 24, in which the higher the score the worse is the freezing of gait.
Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Freezing of gait - II
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Rapid turns test
Once - baseline
Cognition
Time Frame: Once - baseline
Montreal Cognitive Assessment, with scores ranging from 0 to 30, in which the higher the better the cognition.
Once - baseline
Sleep quality
Time Frame: Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, with scores ranging from 0 to 21, in which the higher the worse the sleep quality.
Twice - baseline and after 12 months
Sleep quality and quantity
Time Frame: Once for a full week
Sleep diary
Once for a full week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nienke M de Vries, Dr, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data will be anonymized. The wearable sensor data will not be available for re-use and/or sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the data will be granted for those performing research about Parkinson's disease.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

3
Subscribe