Saline vs Hypertonic Serum With Respiratory Physiotherapy in a Recurrent Wheezing Patient

February 17, 2022 updated by: J. Nicolas Cuenca Zaldivar, Guadarrama Hospital

Saline Serum Versus Hypertonic Serum With Respiratory Physiotherapy in a Recurrent Wheezing Patient: a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Bronchiolitis (BQ) is an acute viral infection of the lower respiratory tract that affects the bronchioles of babies younger than 24 months of age. Respiratory physiotherapy (FTR) appears as a complementary treatment measure in clinical guidelines and consensus on the management of BQ. Nebulization with 3% hypertonic serum before the FTR session induces an osmotic flow of water in the mucus, which facilitates drainage and reduces edema in the submucosal tissue.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Once each patient legal guardians has signed the informed consent document and it has been verified that the inclusion criteria are met, participants will be assigned the same identification number (ID) that is related to its Clinical History (CH) by simple coding; custody of the file with the relationship of each ID with its CH will be the responsibility of the principal investigator. The method of blinding in the allocation will be carried out by choosing envelopes sealed by an external investigator to the study. The contents of the envelopes will be randomized by computer using the numerical randomization sequence generated with R ver 5.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria) based on stratified sampling for homogeneity , in two groups: nebulization with 3% hypertonic solution (group A) and in the nebulization group with 0.9% saline solution (group B).

None of the participants who make up both the control and intervention groups will be prohibited from regular pharmacological treatment as prescribed by their doctor, such as Ventolin. It will be collected in the investigator's notebook the medications that each patient has prescribed by their doctor. But applying a bronchodilator is not part of the protocol, because physiotherapists cannot prescribe or administer a drug. Before receiving the usual and standard manual techniques of respiratory physiotherapy, patients receive nebulization, group A with hypertonic serum 4 ml 3% and group B with a single-dose saline (0.9 NaCl) physiological serum 5 ml for 8 minutes, both with nebulizer Philips® vibrating mesh. The effects of both are similar in effects, in terms of secretions and their osmotic effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the type of serum affects the results of the manual physiotherapy that is later carried out on children, but there is no clinical problem for randomly giving one serum or another, as to what is the effect of the serum on itself.

The intervention ends with a 20-minute session of Respiratory Physiotherapy based on slow expiratory flow: a passive technique of expiratory aid applied to the participants by means of slow thoracic-abdominal pressure that begins at the end of a spontaneous expiration and continues until the residual volume. The physiotherapist through assisted cough or stimulation of the trachea achieves expectoration of sputum. Care must be taken during the maneuvers to maintain a supine position of the patient in a 30-degree incline, to avoid episodes of gastroesophageal reflux and decrease the risk of vomiting.

Both groups will receive 3 evaluations by an investigator who will be blinded on the treatment and the objectives. The evaluations will be carried out at the beginning of the session (T0), immediately after the nebulization (T30) and 10 minutes after the end of the 20-minute physical therapy intervention (T60). This same treatment and evaluation sequence will be carried out every month for 6 months.

The main variables will classify the participants according to the initial clinical severity score proposed by Wang (WS), the Wood-Downes Scale modified by Ferres (WDF-S) and the Pulmonary Score (PS) in addition to the measurement of Sp2 and heart rate (FC) measured through a pulse oximeter (Radical Touchscreen from Massimo®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a medical diagnosis of a recurrent wheezing.
  • Have the informed consent signed by the legal guardians of the kid.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute bronchitis with score> 9 according to the Wang and Pulmonary Score clinical scale.
  • Acute BQ with score> 8 on Ferres' modified Wood-Downes scale (WDF-S)
  • Parental refusal
  • Comorbidity as cardiac, neurological or traumatic pathology.
  • Congenital anomalies.
  • Chronic pulmonary pathology such as bronchodysplasia.
  • Severe obstruction with a punctuation >10 according ESBA and >7 according pulmonary score.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypertonic solution
Hypertonic solution 4 ml 3% , for 8 minutes in a Philips® vibrating mesh nebulizer plus 20 minute session of Respiratory Physiotherapy based on slow expiratory flow.
Hypertonic serum 4 ml 3%, administered for 8 minutes in a Philips® vibrating mesh nebulizer plus 20 minute session of Respiratory Physiotherapy based on slow expiratory flow: passive technique of expiratory aid applied to the participant by means of a slow thoracic-abdominal pressure that begins at the end of a spontaneous expiration and continues until the residual volume. The physiotherapist through assisted cough or stimulation of the trachea achieves expectoration of sputum.
Active Comparator: Physiological solution
Single-dose physiological saline serum (5 ml 0.9% NaCl), for 8 minutes in a Philips® vibrating mesh nebulizer plus 20 minute session of Respiratory Physiotherapy based on slow expiratory flow.
Single-dose physiological saline serum (5 ml 0.9% NaCl), administered for 8 minutes in a Philips® vibrating mesh nebulizer plus 20 minute session of Respiratory Physiotherapy based on slow expiratory flow: passive technique of expiratory aid applied to the participant by means of a slow thoracic-abdominal pressure that begins at the end of a spontaneous expiration and continues until the residual volume. The physiotherapist through assisted cough or stimulation of the trachea achieves expectoration of sputum.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Wang clinical severity scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The clinical severity scale of Wang evaluates the respiratory rate, the presence of wheezing and intercostal retraction, and the patient's general condition, puncturing each dimension from 0 (the possible state) to 3 (values within normal), in addition to offer different cut points for children with more or less than 6 months.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary Score
Time Frame: 6 months
It is a scale that is used to assess the severity of asthmatic exacerbation in children. The clinical severity scoring system is made up of three items: FR (by age), wheezing, and use of accessory musculature (sternocleidomastoid). Each item is scored from 0 to 3, the values of each item are added and a total result is obtained that goes from 0 (without exacerbation or very slight) to 9 (severe exacerbation).
6 months
Wood-Downes scale modified by Ferres
Time Frame: 6 months
Is a quantitative cumulative scale designed to assess clinical severity in patients with BQ. The clinical severity scoring system consists of six items: wheezing, circulation, respiratory rate (RF), heart rate (HR), ventilation, and cyanosis. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, the values of each item are added together and a total result of (1-3) mild, (4-7) moderate and (> 8) severe is obtained, with 14 being the maximum score and 0 the minimum. A higher score indicates a worse condition.
6 months
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by a pulse oximeter (Radical 7 Touchscreen by Massimo®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA).
6 months
Heart rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured by a pulse oximeter (Radical 7 Touchscreen by Massimo®, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Juan Nicolas Cuenca Zaldivar, Mr, Hospital Guadarrama, servicio de fisioterapia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchiolitis

Clinical Trials on Hypertonic solution

3
Subscribe