Improvement of Pigmented Skin Lesions in Patients With Mastocytosis After Performing 2 Sessions of Pigment Laser (LaserMasto)

September 23, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Evaluation of the Improvement of Pigmented Skin Lesions in Patients With Mastocytosis After Performing 2 Sessions of Pigment Laser : Pilot Study Conducted at a Reference Centre Mastocytoses (LaserMasto)

Cutaneous mastocytosis can be isolated or associated with systemic involvement. Urticaria pigmentosa affects around 80 to 85% of adult patients with cutaneous mastocytosis. It is also frequently present in patients with mastocytosis associated with systemic involvement (80% of patients in our experience).

This skin damage is one of the causes of deterioration in quality of life in patients with mastocytosis, through the loss of self-esteem, due to the appearance of lesions. However there are not treatment for urticaria pigmentosa.

Skin involvement in mastocytosis is linked to the accumulation of abnormal mast cells in the dermis. However, the mast cells are not pigmented and the brown-brown color characteristic of Urticaria pigmentosa is explained by melanin pigmentation of the epidermal basal layer.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cutaneous mastocytosis can be isolated or associated with systemic involvement. Urticaria pigmentosa affects around 80 to 85% of adult patients with cutaneous mastocytosis. It is also very frequently present in patients with mastocytosis associated with systemic involvement (80% of patients in our experience).

This skin damage is one of the causes of deterioration in quality of life in patients with mastocytosis, through the loss of self-esteem, due to the appearance of lesions. However ,there is not a treatment for urticaria pigmentosa.

Skin involvement in mastocytosis is linked to the accumulation of abnormal mast cells in the dermis. However, the mast cells are not pigmented and the brown-brown color characteristic of pigmentary urticaria is explained by melanin pigmentation of the epidermal basal layer. This characteristic is often described on skin biopsies of pigmentary urticaria analyzed in hematoxilin-eosin.

The 532 nm Q-Switched laser is known to improve lesions characterized by the presence of melanin pigment in the basal layer of the epidermis, with very little risks. This later is explained by the reduced penetration of light at 532 nm into the skin and the emission time of the laser light which is very low (of the order of a few nanoseconds) for Q-Switched lasers. In the literature, 2 case reports report an efficiency of the laser at 532 nm in this indication in adults.

The hypothesis of this study is that 2 sessions of Q-switched laser could improve the skin lesions of urticaria pigmentosa, leading to an improvement in self-esteem.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • Larrey Hospital - Toulouse University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Christina BULAI LIVIDEANU, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cristina BULAI LIVIDEANU, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with mastocytosis (diagnosis confirmed clinically according to international criteria)
  • Patient with pigmented skin lesions, of moderate to very severe severity (by comparison with a 4-point photographic scale: light, moderate, severe and very severe)
  • Major patient aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patient with social security coverage
  • Patient having given written, free and informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mastocytosis, without skin lesions
  • Patient with pigmented skin lesions, only of mild severity (by comparison with a 4-point photographic scale: mild, moderate, severe and very severe)
  • Patient with another cutaneous mastocytosis phenotype
  • Patient treated by a treatment known as a cytoreductive for mastocytosis: alpha interferon, cladribine, imatinib, midostaurin or any cytoreductive treatment being evaluated by clinical trial in mastocytosis
  • Patient under guardianship, or under curatorship, or not fluent in the French language or unable to understand and complete the study questionnaires
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients with tanned skin following photoexposure within 3 weeks of starting the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser intervention
1 to 2 sessions of pigment laser1
one to two session of pigment laser (532 nm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global clinical evolution of the skin M4 - Blind evaluator
Time Frame: Month 4
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by blind evaluator in month 4 versus baseline
Month 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global clinical evolution of the skin M1 - Blind evaluator
Time Frame: Month 1
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by blind evaluator in month 1 versus baseline
Month 1
Global clinical evolution of the skin M9 - Blind evaluator
Time Frame: Month 9
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by blind evaluator in month 9 versus baseline
Month 9
Global clinical evolution of the skin M4 - Principal investigator
Time Frame: Month 4
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by the principal investigator in month 4 versus baseline
Month 4
Global clinical evolution of the skin M1 - Principal investigator
Time Frame: Month 1
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by the principal investigator in month 1 versus baseline
Month 1
Global clinical evolution of the skin M9 - Principal investigator
Time Frame: Month 9
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by the principal investigator in month 9 versus baseline
Month 9
Severity of a targeted pigment skin lesion - M1
Time Frame: Month 1
the surface area of the target pigment skin lesion (mm2) versus baseline
Month 1
Severity of a targeted pigment skin lesion - M4
Time Frame: Month 4
the surface area of the target pigment skin lesion (mm2) versus baseline
Month 4
Severity of a targeted pigment skin lesion - M9
Time Frame: Month 9
the surface area of the target pigment skin lesion (mm2) versus baseline
Month 9
Psychological impact - baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
qualitative analysis of the patient verbatim after an interview
Baseline
Psychological impact - Month 4
Time Frame: Month 4
qualitative analysis of the patient verbatim after an interview
Month 4
Psychological impact - Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
qualitative analysis of the patient verbatim after an interview
Month 9
Patient satisfaction - Month 1
Time Frame: month 1
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by patient versus baseline
month 1
Patient satisfaction - Month 4
Time Frame: month 4
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by patient versus baseline
month 4
Patient satisfaction - Month 9
Time Frame: month 9
Global clinical evolution with IGA " Improvement Global Assessment" (scale with 5 points : no improvement or aggravation/minimal improvement/moderate improvement/significant improvement/complete disappearance) by patient versus baseline
month 9
global patient satisfaction
Time Frame: month 9
Analog visual scale from 0 to 10
month 9
Pigment laser tolerance
Time Frame: Day 1
Analog visual scale from 0 to 10
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christina BULAI LIVIDEANU, MD, Toulouse University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cutaneous Mastocytosis

Clinical Trials on Pigment laser

3
Subscribe