Usefulness of Contrast Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cysts

June 20, 2022 updated by: Olar Miruna-Patricia, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Usefulness of Contrast-enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the Differentiation of the Pancreatic Cysts and for Guiding Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) From Murale Nodules.

The study evaluates the role of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) for the differentiation of the pancreatic cysts and their malignant potential.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Due to the increase use of cross-sectional imaging techniques for varied medical conditions more and more pancreatic cysts are incidentally found. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a prevalence of incidental pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN) in adults between 2,4-49,1% and autopsy studies showed that half of the individuals had pancreatic cysts.

There is a great variety of pancreatic cysts, they are mainly divided in neoplastic or non-neoplastic (i.e pseudocyst). Pseudocysts appear after acute or chronic pancreatitis and represent only 20% of all pancreatic cysts.. PCN include a diverse group of pancreatic cysts including mucin-producing (Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN)) and nonmucin-producing lesions (Serous cystadenoma (SCN), Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm(SPN) cystic neuroendocrine tumor(cNET)) with different morphology and progression to malignancy. SPN's,cNET are considered premalignant or malignant conditions and require surveillance or surgical resection. SCN instead are benign and surveillance is not necessary. Resection is considered only if symptoms are present.

The discrimination between the different cyst types is crucial for the therapeutic approach. Their morphology can be similar and sometimes it's a challenge to diagnose them.There are many tools but none is good enough to be used alone.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound using low mechanical index (0.12-0.4) is an additional test to assess the vascularization of the cystic wall and the septa and solid component for the differential diagnosis of PCN.

Our aim was to identify specific imaging characteristics using CH-EUS in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy for potential malignant pancreatic cysts.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400162
        • Regional Institite of Gastroenterology and hepatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of an undetermined pancreatic cyst >10mm (Computer tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging);
  • written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • platelet count under 50.000 platelets per microliter (mcL)
  • patients with cardiorespiratory instability
  • refuse of the patient to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: study participants
After a careful endoscopic ultrasound examination in B mode of the entire pancreas, contrast enhancement was administrated to the participants. The uptake and the wash-out of the agent were followed and then a morphological diagnose was established. EUS-fine needle aspiration of the cyst wall, septa or solid components was guided by the enhancing pattern.

During the echoendoscopy the image was fixed on the region of interest (pancreatic cyst) and the extended pure harmonic detection mode was selected. 2,4ml contrast enhancement (Sonovue-Bracco Italy) was injected in the right antecubital vein of the participants followed by a flush of 5ml 0.9% saline solution to ensure that the entire quantity of the agent goes in to the blood flow.

After the administration the pancreatic cyst was observed for at least 120 seconds.We followed the enhancing behavior of the cyst wall, the septa and the solid components. Arterial enhancement (contrast uptake) was considered the first 25-30 seconds after injection and the venous phase (wah-out) 30-45 seconds after injection.

EUS-FNA was performed in all patients without contraindications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specific imaging characteristics using CH-EUS
Time Frame: Baseline
To identify specific imaging characteristics using CH-EUS ( the contrast uptake pattern) in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy for the different type of the pancreatic cysts
Baseline
Differentiation between murale nodules and mucus clots or debris
Time Frame: Baseline
The role of CH-EUS for the identification of true mural nodules
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Guiding EUS-FNA by the enhancement pattern
Time Frame: One month
To asses the improvement of the EUS-FNA results if the lesions are targeted through the enhancement pattern
One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Andrada Seicean, MD,PhD, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Cluj-Napoca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cyst

Clinical Trials on Contrast enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound

3
Subscribe