Analgesia in the Second Stage of Labour (ASL)

May 15, 2020 updated by: Åsa Waldum, Oslo University Hospital

Analgesia in the Second Stage of Labour - With Special Focus on Pudendal Block

This study investigates efficacy, safety and childbirth experience in women receiving pudendal block during the final stage of delivery. It is an observational study and half of included primarous women recieve a pudendal block.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pudendal block is used when there is a need to alleviate pain in the final stage of labour:

  • From fully dilated cervix to delivery of the child.
  • Associated with pain as the foetus rotates and descends through the pelvis.
  • End of second stage: the perineum dilates as the child is being born.

Pudendal block is provided by inserting a needle close to the pudendal nerve that runs through the pelvis and innervates the perineal area.Pudendal block is an old and relatively simple method, but not well studied. The main aim is to study pudendal nerve block as pain relief in final stage of labour for primiparous women delivering vaginally.

The investigators aim to investigate whether possible adverse effects may outweigh the positive analgesic effect in the final stage of labour, or the opposite. The ASL (Analgesia in the Second stage of Labour) study may fill knowledge gaps and add important knowledge regarding pain relief during the final stage of childbirth.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1007

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The participants is selected from 2 delivery units at Oslo Univeristy Hospital (OUH) in Oslo, Norway. OUH is a third referral hospital, the largest Obstetrics Dept. in Norway, and accounting for 1/6 of all deliveries in Norway (9600 deliveries/year).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Norwegian-speaking/reading
  • Primiparity
  • Single pregnancy
  • Vaginal birth
  • Cephalic presentation
  • ≥37+0
  • Age ≥18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transferre from midwifery-led birth unit
  • Allergy to local anaesthesia
  • Not valid data on pudendal block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Exposed
Pudendal nerve block provided
Pudendal nerve block provided during last fase of delivery
Not exposed
Pudendal nerve block is NOT provided

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Childbirth experience
Time Frame: Responds to questionnaire 4-12 weeks after delivery.
Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ), total score on a scale from 1.0 to 4.0. Higher score means better experience.
Responds to questionnaire 4-12 weeks after delivery.
Urinary retention
Time Frame: 3 hours
Urinary retention after delivery defined as inability to void and need for catheterization within 3 hours.
3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain, obstetric
Time Frame: Responds to questionnaire 4-12 weeks after delivery.
Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scale from 0 to 100, higher scpre means more pain.
Responds to questionnaire 4-12 weeks after delivery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anne Flem Jacobsen, PhD, Univeristy of Oslo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Anonymous individual participant data for the primary outcome measures will be made available on request, when the study is finished. Access to data will be restricted due to sensitive nature of the data, but will be shared if asked for within the anonymous data restriction imposed by the patient consent and ethical body approval.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available on request within 1 year after study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access will be considered on specific request. Requestors wil be required to sign a Data Access Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Retention

Clinical Trials on Pudendal nerve block

3
Subscribe