Effectiveness of Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) in Neonatal Respiratory Distress (bCPAP)

May 22, 2020 updated by: Tehreem Fatima, King Edward Medical University

Comparison of Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) Versus Control in Neonates With Respiratory Distress

The objective of study is to determine the effectiveness of bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) in neonates presenting with respiratory distress as compared to the control group ( using oxygen via nasal cannula). The effectiveness will be calculated in terms of reduction in Silverman Anderson Retraction Score.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

After approval from the IRB of King Edward Medical University, and taking informed consent from parents of the participants, total of 120 neonates fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomly allocated in two groups; group A and group B. All demographic details of participants in both groups be collected. In group A, neonates will be given bCPAP for respiratory support while neonates in group B, will be given nasal oxygen as control group. Neonates in both groups will be followed for 48 hours. The effectiveness will be determined by the reduction in Silverman Anderson Retraction Score (SARS) up to or less than 3, at the end of 48 hours. Data will be collected and analysed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital Lahore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having age 28 days of life or younger (Neonates)
  • Gender- both male and female
  • Gestational ages ≥32 weeks
  • Having respiratory distress (as per the operational definition- respiratory rate >60/min plus any of the following features: grunting, subcostal/intercostal retractions, nasal flaring, inability to maintain spO2 >90% at room air)
  • Silverman Anderson Retraction Score ≥4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates having gestational age less than 32 weeks
  • Birth weight less than 1.5 kg
  • Neonates having congenital malformations, air leak syndromes, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy
  • Neonates requiring mechanical ventilation at the time of admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Use of Bubble CPAP for management of respiratory distress

The bCPAP will be delivered using an oxygen flow meter as the oxygen source. This inspiratory limb containing oxygen from the flow meter will be connected to humidifier and tubing from humidifier will be connected to short binasal prongs, which would be applied to neonate with the help of adhesive bandage on both cheeks. It will be ensured that binasal prongs make appropriate seal. An orogastric tube will be placed for gastric decompression. A 1000 ml/500ml bottle filled with sterile water be used and marks will be made on it at 1cm distance, with '10' marked at base and '0' mark at the water interface.

The expiratory limb from the nasal prongs was connected to tubing that will be dipped in water up to the desired level to provide positive end expiratory pressure. Pressure is varied by varying the depth of the dipped end of tubing.

Active Comparator: Group B
Use of Oxygen via nasal cannula for respiratory distress
The oxygen will be delivered from a wall oxygen source, delivered between 1 to 6 L/min and the rate varied via a flow regulator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of Bubble CPAP determined by improvement in Silvermann Anderson Retraction Score
Time Frame: 48 hours since application of intervention
Neonates in both groups will be followed-up for 48 hours. SAR Score will be recorded at 0 and 48 hours. It consists of five components: (1) chest retractions (2) retraction of the lower intercostal muscles (3) xiphoid retractions (4) flaring of nares with inhalation (5) grunting on exhalation. Each of the five factors is graded 0, 1 and 2. The sum of these factors yields the total score; minimum score is '0' and maximum score is '10'. The higher the score, the greater is the severity of respiratory distress. So the severity of respiratory distress can be graded according to the SAR Score as Mild (score 0-3), Moderate (score4-6) and Severe (score 6-10). Effectiveness is recorded as 'positive' in case of reduction in SARS score ≤3. A cut-off of score '3' is taken. So if the score of 3 or less than 3 is achieved with bCPAP or with nasal oxygen after 48 hours of intervention, the intervention is considered to be effective
48 hours since application of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean reduction in SAR Score
Time Frame: 48 hours
Mean reduction in Silverman Anderson Retraction Score, over a period of 48 hours, in both groups
48 hours
Difference in mean reduction
Time Frame: 48 hours
difference between both the groups, will also be calculated.
48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tehreem Fatima, FCPS, King Edward Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neonatal Respiratory Distress

Clinical Trials on Bubble CPAP

3
Subscribe