Hypotonic Hyponatremia: Criteria for the Correct Classification of Its Etiology and of Patient Volume Status

Hypotonic Hyponatremia: Criteria for the Correct Classification of Its Etiology and of Patient Volume Status at the Access in the Emergency Department and at the Subsequent Re-evaluation in Hospital Wards

Hyponatremia is the most frequent electrolyte disorder encountered in clinical practice. The patient approach, however, is still problematic, above all because hyponatremia is a manifestation correlated to various pathological conditions, with complex etiopathogenesis.

Even though some algorithms have been proposed to correctly assess hyponatremia subtype classification and patient volume status, there is no single parameter that has proven to be able alone to perfectly achieve this result.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hyponatremia is the most frequent electrolyte disorder encountered in clinical practice and is often associated with increased mortality, morbidity and risk of hospitalization. The patient approach, however, is still problematic, above all because hyponatremia is a manifestation correlated to various pathological conditions, with complex etiopathogenesis.

The most commonly used classification of hypotonic hyponatremia is, nowadays, the one described in a famous review by Kumar and Berl (see Bibliography). Probably the most crucial point in this classification is represented by the correct assessment of Extracellular Fluid Volume Status (i.e. hypovolemia, euvolemia, hypervolemia).

Even though some algorithms have been proposed to correctly assess hyponatremia subtype classification and patient volume status, there is no single parameter that has proven to be able alone to perfectly achieve this result.

In the current study, the reference test (gold standard) for the definitive assessment of hyponatremia subtype classification and patient volume status was a post-discharge re-evaluation of all the available evidence (with the exception of plasma copeptin levels) carried out by two independent neuroendocrinologists with specific expertise in sodium disorders. In case of disagreement, the experts proceeded to a discussion and comparison of their opinions, in order to produce a shared one.

Using this gold standard, the main aims of this observational prospective study were:

  1. to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinicians in identifying the subtype of hyponatremia at the first evaluation of the patients in the ED and then at the admission to the wards;
  2. to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the most important methods suggested by the literature (clinical, imaging, biochemical) for the assessment of Extracellular Fluid Volume.

In addition to this, in recent years copeptin has been shown to be a promising parameter for the evaluation of sodium disorders and water imbalances, but its diagnostic role in the setting of hyponatremic patients is still largely unknown. Therefore, a secondary objective of the study was to specifically evaluate the utility of copeptin (whose values - as specified before - were hidden to the neuroendocrinologists in charge of defining the gold standard diagnoses for each patient) for the assessment of hyponatremia subtype classification and patient volume status.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Piemonte
      • Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 10126
        • AOU Città della salute e della scienza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All consecutive patients admitted at the emergency department (ED) of our hospital in the time frames specified in the inclusion criteria with a detection, at the time of ED access, of moderate-severe hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium < 130 mmol/L at blood gas analysis).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Access to the emergency department (ED) of our hospital from Monday to Thursday, between 8 am and 6 pm (time constraint needed so that all the necessary laboratory analyzes could be correctly completed)
  • Detection at the time of ED access of moderate-severe hyponatremia, defined as serum sodium < 130 mmol/L at blood gas analysis (BGA)
  • Need for hospitalization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Programmed hospitalization that did not include access through the ED

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subtype classification of hypotonic hyponatremia according to the overall judgment of the clinical case by the point-of-care clinician
Time Frame: At ED admission
The point-of-care clinician was asked to provide a subtype classification of hypotonic hyponatremia according to his/her overall judgment of the clinical case (using Kumar and Berl classification classes as a reference frame). This will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section). The strength of agreement (by Cohen's kappa) and the accuracy will thus be evaluated.
At ED admission
Subtype classification of hypotonic hyponatremia according to the overall judgment of the clinical case by the point-of-care clinician
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
The point-of-care clinician was asked to provide a subtype classification of hypotonic hyponatremia according to his/her overall judgment of the clinical case (using Kumar and Berl classification classes as a reference frame). This will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section). The strength of agreement (by Cohen's kappa) and the accuracy will thus be evaluated.
At hospital ward admission
Physical Examination (PE) as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Elements of PE relevant for ECF Volume Status assessment were recorded (blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary crepitations/rales, jugular vein distension, peripheral edema, dry mucous membranes). The overall evaluation of ECF Volume Status based on PE alone will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section).
At ED admission
Physical Examination (PE) as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Elements of PE relevant for ECF Volume Status assessment were recorded (blood pressure, heart rate, pulmonary crepitations/rales, jugular vein distension, peripheral edema, dry mucous membranes). The overall evaluation of ECF Volume Status based on PE alone will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section).
At hospital ward admission
Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) ultrasound evaluation as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
IVC diameter and collapsibility were recorded. The overall evaluation of ECF Volume Status based on IVC ultrasound evaluation alone will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section).
At ED admission
Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) ultrasound evaluation as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
IVC diameter and collapsibility were recorded. The overall evaluation of ECF Volume Status based on IVC ultrasound evaluation alone will be compared to the gold standard reference (as defined in the "Study Description" Section).
At hospital ward admission
Serum creatinine as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) will be used to estimate GFR (ml/min) according to CKD-EPI formula. eGFR will then be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Serum urea as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Serum urea (mg/dl) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Serum urea / serum creatinine ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Serum urea / serum creatinine ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Urine sodium as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Urine sodium (mmol/L), evaluated on a spot sample, will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Urine sodium / urine osmolality ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Urine sodium / urine osmolality ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Urine sodium / plasma osmolality ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Urine sodium / plasma osmolality ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Serum NT-proBNP as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Serum NT-proBNP (pg/ml) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Serum NT-proBNP / urine sodium ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Serum NT-proBNP / urine sodium ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Serum creatinine as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) will be used to estimate GFR (ml/min) according to CKD-EPI formula. eGFR will then be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Serum urea as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Serum urea (mg/dl) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Serum urea / serum creatinine ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Serum urea / serum creatinine ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium (mmol/L), evaluated on a spot sample, will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium / urine osmolality ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium / urine osmolality ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium / plasma osmolality ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Urine sodium / plasma osmolality ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Plasma renin activity (PRA) as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
PRA (ng/ml/h) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Uric acid as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Uric acid (mg/dl) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plasma copeptin as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Plasma copeptin (pmol/L) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Plasma copeptin / urine sodium ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At ED admission
Plasma copeptin / urine sodium ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At ED admission
Plasma copeptin as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Plasma copeptin (pmol/L) will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission
Plasma copeptin / urine sodium ratio as a tool for the assessment of Extra-Cellular Fluid (ECF) Volume Status
Time Frame: At hospital ward admission
Plasma copeptin / urine sodium ratio will be compared between three main groups of interest (i.e. hypovolemic, euvolemic and hypervolemic patients). As already previously described, these groups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
At hospital ward admission

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospitalization
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after ED admission
The length of hospitalization will be compared across subgroups according to hyponatremia subtype classification. As already previously described, these subgroups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
Up to 6 months after ED admission
Overall mortality
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after ED admission
All deaths occurring during hospitalization and/or within 6 months after hospital discharge will be registered. The overall mortality will be compared across subgroups (using a survival analysis model) according to hyponatremia subtype classification. As already previously described, these subgroups will be identified by the gold standard reference defined in the "Study Description" Section.
Up to 6 months after ED admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ezio Ghigo, MD, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyponatremia

3
Subscribe