Improving Balance for Older Adults: Disseminating Tai Chi Fundamentals Through Community Organizations

June 25, 2020 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

This study will evaluate how best to disseminate and implement Tai Chi Fundamentals® (TCF) in community settings for older adults with balance problems. TCF is a program designed for older adults with pain and physical limitations to enhance balance, coordination, strength and endurance. Investigator will evaluate program implementation including Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC) uptake, reach, feasibility, teaching fidelity, and exercise adherence and also collect outcomes including leg strength, balance, walking ability and executive function before and after the 6-week session. The final product of this study will be recommendations to address key barriers and facilitators for implementation of TCF by community organizations serving older adults.

The primary aim for this study is to evaluate the program implementation. This is not an efficacy study. Within the limits of a Dissemination and Implementation grant budget, Investigators do take advantage of a natural experiment even if it is not the primary aim of this study. By doing so investigators plan to establish the feasibility of this multi-site data collection plan for future studies. Based on the study settings, study team will get a chance to explore the effect of TCF in real world settings since two sessions can be held in a fall season and a spring season. In addition to the pre-post tests of TCF sessions to explore TCF effectiveness, pre-test scores for session 2 are compared to post-test scores of session 1 participants since both are collected at nearly the same time. The larger sample will be for the within group pre-post comparison analyses. This will be a valuable opportunity to test data collection procedures for future trials.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

197

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States, 54601
        • Aging and Disability Resource Center (ADRC)
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53704
        • Goodman Community Center
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53205
        • Milwaukee County Department on Aging

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being 65 years and older
  • dwelling independently in the community
  • agreeing to be randomized
  • reporting a fall (to the ground or lower level in the last year or having a strong fear of falling.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • using a walker indoors
  • having a terminal illness
  • being hospitalized or in a nursing home in the past 2 months
  • anticipated absence from two tai chi sessions and
  • receiving physical therapy or a community course or balance exercise program for falls prevention in the prior 2 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tai Chi Prime (TCP)-session 1
This arm will receive Tai chi prime as an intervention. TCP is a combination of two components: (a) Tai-chi fundamental Adapted Program, and (b) home practice coaching.
TCP is a 6-week twice-weekly simplified tai chi class of 1.5 hr per session with two components: (a) Tai-chi fundamental Adapted Program, and (b) home practice coaching.
No Intervention: Wait list control-session 2
Wait-list group will be receiving Tai-chi prime intervention after 8 weeks wait time. At week 7, pre-test measures from wait-list group will be used as a control and compared with the post intervention measures of the experimental group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of participants retention
Time Frame: 7 week (for session 1) ,7 week ( for session 2)
Rate of participant retention in 2 sessions of TCP
7 week (for session 1) ,7 week ( for session 2)
Number of days participants practiced Tai-chi at home
Time Frame: 7 week (for session 1) , 7 week( for session 2)
Participants will report the average time they are practicing Tai-chi every day at home
7 week (for session 1) , 7 week( for session 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the time taken to complete 'Trail Making Test Part B'
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
The Trail Making Test(TMT) is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching. In TMT, the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. The time taken to complete the test being used as the primary performance metric.
baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale score
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)

The ABC scale is a self- report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness.

ABC is an 11-point scale and ratings should consist of whole numbers (0-100) for each item. Participants will indicate their level of confidence in doing an activity without losing balance or becoming unsteady by choosing one of the percentage points on the scale from 0%-100%. Total the ratings (possible range = 0 to 1600) and divide by 16 to get each participant's ABC score.

Scores lower than 50 indicate a low level of functioning, scores above 50 but below 80 indicate a medium level, and those over 80 indicate a high level of functioning.

baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Change in the static balance as measured by Single-leg Balance
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Static balance is the ability to maintain the body in some fixed posture.
baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Change in time taken to complete TUG (Timed Up and Go) test
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)

TUG test is a test of mobility and gait. Participant will timed for the following TUG test

  • Participants will be asked to sit back in a standard chair and identify a line 3 meters, or 10 feet away.
  • At 'Go' participant will stand up from the chair.
  • Walk to the line on the floor at your normal pace.
  • Turn.
  • Walk back to the chair at your normal pace.
  • Sit down again.

Time taken from start to finish will be measured in seconds.

An older adult who takes ≥12 seconds to complete the TUG is at risk for falling.

baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Change in the time taken to hold tandem stands in the 4-stage balance test
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)

4 stage balance test consists of four standing positions that get progressively harder to maintain.

instructor will describe and demonstrate each position to the participant.Then the instructor will stand next to the participant, hold their arm,and help them assume the correct position. When the participant will be steady, let go, and time how long they can maintain the position. Instructor will be ready to assist the participant if they lose their balance.

If the participant can hold a position for 10 seconds without moving their feet or needing support, instructor can ask to go on to the next position. If not, test will be stopped.

Participants should not use an assistive device (cane or walker) and they should keep their eyes open.

Participants (older adults) who cannot hold the tandem stand for at least 10 seconds will be at increased risk of falling.

baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)
Change in the 'number of times the participant comes to a full standing position in 30 seconds'
Time Frame: baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)

The 30 Second Chair Stand Test can help to indicate if a patient is at risk of falling. Purpose of this test is to test the strength and endurance.

Instructions to the participant:

  • Sit in the middle of the chair.
  • Place each hand on the opposite shoulder crossed at the wrists.
  • Place your feet flat on the floor.
  • Keep your back straight and keep your arms against your chest.
  • On "Go", rise to a full standing position and then sit back down again.
  • Repeat this for 30 seconds.

On "Go" timer starts.

Number of times the participant comes to a full standing position in 30 seconds will be recorded.

If the participant is over halfway to a standing position when 30 seconds have elapsed, it will be counted as stand.

baseline for session 1, 7 weeks (post test for session 1) and 7 weeks (pretest for session 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Betty Chewning, PhD, University of Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 31, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-0897
  • A561000 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • PHARM/PHARMACY/PHARMACY (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Older Aged Adults; Balance

Clinical Trials on Tai-chi prime (TCP)

3
Subscribe