Clinical Evaluation of Early Onset Neonatal Infection (CLEEONI)

December 31, 2021 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Early bacterial neonatal infection (INBP) defined as occurring in the first 3 days and by extension in the first week of life, remains to this day the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in developed countries. The germs most frequently found are Streptococcus B (SB) for term newborns (> 37 Weeks of Amenorrhea SA) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in premature newborns. Although in France, its incidence of 0.4 / 1000 is lower than in other developed countries (0.8 / 1000 general incidence), it remains a major public health concern.

The infection criteria were defined by the National Agency for Health Accreditation and Assessment (ANAES) in 2002, allowing to differentiate between proven infections and highly probable cases of infection. Infection is considered to be proven when SB or E. coli is detected in blood culture or in cerebrospinal fluid. An infection is considered to be highly probable in the event of association of clinical signs (fever, polypnea, desaturation, tachycardia, etc.) evoking a beginning sepsis associating with a disturbance of the biological balance sheet (elevation of CRP, hyperleukocytosis, evidence of colonization on peripheral samples). These criteria remain valid to this day to define the infection.

In order to define the newborns to be monitored, risk factors were established after a review of the literature in 2002. They make it possible to decide on diagnostic management and / or the setting up of a treatment.

Since the recommendations of the ANAES of 2002, the rule, from the presence of a major criterion, was to carry out bacteriological samples peripheral to the birth (gastric liquid, swab of ear and anus) and to systematically collect a CRP of the child between H12 and H48. In the presence of an isolated minor risk factor, simple clinical monitoring (routine) was recommended for 48 hours without deciding firmly on the need for a biological sample. However, it is important to note that these two categories of signs are defined and classified in descending order of risk. This classification does not prejudge a systematic therapeutic attitude. In many situations, the choice is actually left to the practitioner depending on the context.

In 2017, new recommendations were implemented by the French Society of Pediatrics (SFP) and the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) regarding the prevention of INBP. These take up the risk factors of the 2002 ANAES by adding PCR SB at the same level as the traditional PV. They define 3 categories of children according to the risk of INBP and the associated care.

In most cases, these new practices make it possible to dispense with costly blood and bacteriological samples, which cause discomfort and pain for children. In addition, the use of gastric fluid is not internationally validated, its use in the management case remains very controversial. In case of delayed CRP or positive peripheral samples to the germs generated, and even in the absence of clinical signs, antibiotic therapy was almost systematically initiated. Unnecessary exposure to antibiotics promotes the development of bacteriological resistance and unbalances the neonatal flora.

Following the implementation of these new recommendations at the Notre Dame de Bon Secours maternity hospital, which is the case in few centers today and no national survey has yet been carried out on their application, it therefore seems necessary to us evaluate the application of these new recommendations and verify that they allow the detection of all probable or proven infections.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

936

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

- Newborns over 36 weeks old, born between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2019 at the GHPSJ maternity, having benefited from close infectious surveillance according to the criteria of the 2017 recommendations (Groups B and C).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns over 36 weeks old, born between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2019 at the GHPSJ maternity
  • Newborn having benefited from close infectious surveillance according to the criteria of the 2017 recommendations (Groups B and C)
  • In birth suites near their mother
  • Francophone parents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents objecting to participation in the study
  • Parents deprived of their liberty
  • Parents under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Newborn screening
Time Frame: Month 3
This outcome corresponds to percentage of asymptomatic infants at risk for INBP in whom close clinical surveillance has shown no signs of infectious disease, and who have had a probable or proven infection between the discharge from maternity and the age of 1 and 3 months.
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
negative predictive value of SB PCR for children with proven group B Streptococcus infection
Time Frame: Month 3
This outcome corresponds to percentage of newborns infected with group B Streptococcus (proven infection) during the postnatal stay and whose mothers' PCRs were negative per partum, whether or not they were monitored.
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CLEEONI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Newborn

3
Subscribe