Lateral Nodal Recurrence in Rectal Cancer (LaNoReC)

January 16, 2023 updated by: M. Kusters, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Local recurrence rates in rectal cancer have reduced dramatically since the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) technique and neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (C))RT) to overall rates of 5-year local recurrence to 5-10%.

However, distal rectal cancers have a tendency to spread to lateral lymph nodes and it was recently shown that patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes of ≥7mm short-axis size have a considerable chance of a local recurrence: 15-20%. This is regardless of CRT with TME in two retrospective cohorts (Lateral Node Consortium and Snapshot Rectal Cancer 2016 study). According to the Lateral Node Consortium study, this rate was significantly reduced to <6% when performing a lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) after (C)RT + TME.

A major drawback of these recent multi-center studies is their retrospective nature. Therefore, in the Netherlands, radiologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons and pathologists have recently been educated and trained to enhance knowledge and awareness of LLNs and to implement nerve-sparing minimally invasive LLND.

The LaNoReC trial is a prospective registration study aimed at evaluating oncological outcomes after multi-disciplinary training. The main question of this study is whether, after dedicated training and the performance of LLNDs, the lateral local recurrence rate in rectal cancers with enlarged nodes (≥7mm) can be reduced to below 6%.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Local recurrence rates in rectal cancer have reduced dramatically since the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) technique. These rates have been lowered further with the use of neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy ((C)RT) regimens in appropriate cases, decreasing overall rates of 5-year local recurrence to 5-10%. However, in patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLNs, ≥7mm short-axis size), recurrence rates have remained high, up to 20%. Most likely, this is caused by lymphatic spread of low rectal cancer to the lateral compartments. Western surgeons have always relied on (C)RT to sterilize the lateral compartments, containing the internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes, alleviating fears of operative morbidity and nerve function disorders associated with a lateral lymph node dissection (LLND), mainly performed in the East. Furthermore, most Western clinicians consider lateral nodal disease to represent metastatic disease, not amendable to cure.

The Lateral Node Consortium undertook a multi-centre study with 12 centres from seven countries, collecting data over a 5-year period, including all consecutive patients operated for a cT3 or T4 rectal cancer. In all patients, every series of MRIs was re-reviewed by a standardized protocol, examining lateral pelvic nodes, defining these according to size and the presence of malignant features and relating these to the development of locally recurrent disease. In the first publication of the consortium with a total of 1216 patients, it was shown that pre-treatment lateral lymph node (LLN) size of ≥7 mm, results in an unacceptably high incidence of lateral local recurrence of 20%, despite (C)RT with TME. Within the consortium, several centres performed LLND's after (C)RT, which resulted in a significantly lower rate of lateral local recurrence of 6% in nodes ≥7 mm (p = 0.042). Furthermore, LLN enlargement did not influence distant metastases rate, suggesting it is a local issue which requires to be addressed through targeted treatment in the pelvis, rather simply representing a marker of poor prognosis and distant disease.

Additionally, a second study, the Snapshot Rectal Cancer 2016 was conducted in 2020. This national retrospective cohort study included 3057 patients operated for rectal cancer in 2016 with a 4-year follow-up period. Radiologists were trained for LLN classification and measurements and re-reviewed MRIs of 882 patients with low (≤8cm from the anorectal junction), cT3/4 rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy with the help of two atlases. This study found a 4-year LLR risk of 15% in presence of enlarged LLNs.

The major drawback of these multi-center studies are their retrospective nature. Radiological reporting of LLNs was low for primary MRIs, which may have influenced treatment decisions. Consequently, LLNs may have not been separately included in irradiation field. Moreover, neither study was able to investigate the effect of LLND in a trained setting. In the Netherlands, radiologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons and pathologists have recently been educated and trained to enhance knowledge and awareness of LLNs and to implement nerve-sparing minimally invasive LLND. The LaNoReC describes a prospective evaluation of oncological outcomes after multi-disciplinary training, thereby aiming for a 50% reduction in LLR rates.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • North-Holland
      • Amsterdam, North-Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with rectal cancer with one or more lateral nodes with a short-axis of ≥7mm or ≥5mm with one or more malignant features (i.e. round shape, irregular margins, heterogeneity, loss of fatty hilum).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• All patients with rectal cancer with one or more lateral nodes with a short-axis of ≥7mm or ≥5mm with one or more malignant features (i.e. round shape, irregular margins, heterogeneity, loss of fatty hilum).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 18 years old
  • Pelvic irradiation in the medical history
  • Previous lateral lymph node dissection related to pelvic malignancy
  • Synchronous distant metastases
  • Familiar adenomatous polyposis
  • Synchronous colon cancer with a higher stage than rectal cancer
  • Absolute contraindication for general anaesthesia
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lateral local recurrence
Time Frame: 3 years
Lateral local recurrence diagnosed during the follow up
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
The measure of time after treatment during which no sign of cancer is found.
3 years
Overall patient survival
Time Frame: 3 years
The percentage of people who are alive 3 years after the surgery.
3 years
Morbidity and functional outcomes assessed by LARS questions
Time Frame: 3 years
Use of questionnaire LARS
3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-CR29
Time Frame: 3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-CR29
3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D
Time Frame: 3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D
3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 3 years
Quality of life as assessed by the QLQ-C30
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miranda Kusters, MD, PhD, VUMedicalCentre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

IPD data that underlie results in a publication can be made available upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting after initial publication of data

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests will be assessed by the study team

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

3
Subscribe