Clinical Outcomes of USCTR vs. mOCTR

September 22, 2025 updated by: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Clinical Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release With and Without Ultrasound Guidance

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment neuropathy and affects 3-6% of adults in the United States. In patients with severe or refractory symptoms, carpal tunnel release (CTR) represents the definitive management option, and over 550,000 CTRs are performed annually in the United States with over 90% of patients reporting clinical improvement. Currently available CTR techniques include mini-open CTR via a single, 1-3 cm palmar incision (mOCTR), endoscopic CTR via one (wrist) or two (wrist and palm) 1-2 cm incisions (ECTR), and ultrasound guided CTR via a single < 1 cm wrist or palmar incision (USCTR or CTR-US). The primary objective is to assess the impact of USCTR vs mOCTR in a military population. Investigators hypothesize that USCTR using the SX-One MicroKnife, also known as UltraGuideCTR, will safely and non-inferiorly improve symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome compared to traditional mOCTR, without greater less loss of military duty days. This study is a single-site randomized controlled trial.

Participants with CTS will be randomized to a study arm and receive treatment with USCTR vs. traditional mOCTR. All patients will be followed for a period of 24 months with respect to standard clinical data, military relevant data, and validated patient related outcome measures (PROMs). Data will be collected at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, and 24 months post-CTR procedure, with the primary focus being on outcomes up to 1 year.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Clinical outcomes of up to 83 participants (updated target sample size) treated with USCTR vs. traditional mOCTR will be investigated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814
        • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults age ≥18 years
  • DEERS Eligible
  • Fluent in speaking, reading, and understanding English
  • Clinical diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
  • Candidate for surgical CTR based on severe and/or refractory symptoms
  • Confirmatory electrodiagnostic test indicating median neuropathy at the wrist (abnormal findings)
  • Ultrasound findings consistent with median nerve enlargement in the carpal tunnel

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous carpal tunnel release or previous wrist surgery on the ipsilateral side
  • Carpal tunnel injection with corticosteroid within 6 weeks prior to anticipated study procedure
  • Previous traumatic injury to the median nerve or any of its branches on the ipsilateral side
  • History of medical condition that would preclude safe participation in study procedures (e. g. complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), upper limb vascular disease (including thoracic outlet syndrome), Raynaud's phenomenon, etc.)
  • Inability to stop anticoagulation medications (Plavix, Coumadin/Warfarin, Xarelto), or unable to be bridged with Lovenox
  • Unable to understand and provide written informed consent
  • Contraindication to proceeding with USCTR based on diagnostic ultrasound (i.e. identification of anomalous anatomic structures such as transligamentous thenar motor branch or space occupying lesions within the carpal tunnel)
  • Electrodiagnostic evaluation of the carpal tunnel which indicates normal findings

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: USCTR Procedure
Participants will undergo the USCTR procedure with SX-One MicroKnife®, also known as UltraGuideCTR
Ultrasound guided CTR via a single < 1 cm wrist or palmar incision. The procedure will be performed using the SX-One MicroKnife®, also known as UltraGuideCTR
Active Comparator: mOCTR Procedure
Participants will undergo the traditional mOCTR procedure.
Mini-open CTR via a single 1-3cm palmar incision

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical time during procedure (minutes)
Time Frame: At time of procedure, measured as day 0
On the day the participant receives their study assigned procedure (USCTR vs. mOCTR), clinical team will record surgical time to perform the procedure in minutes
At time of procedure, measured as day 0
Incision length in cm
Time Frame: At time of procedure, measured as day 0
On the day the participant receives their study assigned procedure (USCTR vs. mOCTR), clinical team will record incision length in cm
At time of procedure, measured as day 0
Measure the effect of USCTR vs mOCTR on the longitudinal change in QuickDASH.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

QuickDash is a region-specific PROM consisting of 11 items measuring the difficulty in performing physical activities relevant to shoulder, arm or hand function. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-5 and a final score of 0 to 100 is calculated, with higher scores representing greater degrees of upper extremity disability (0 points indicate no disability and 100 points indicates maximum disability).

For the primary analysis, change in QuickDASH score will be tracked across the first five occasions of assessment (i.e. baseline - 1 month) and the patient-level average trend will be compared between randomized groups. As a secondary analysis, change in QuickDASH will be tracked over the full duration of follow-up, with the primary focus being on outcomes up to 1 year.

Change from baseline to 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Measure the effect of USCTR vs mOCTR on the longitudinal change in BCTQ-SSS.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

The BCTQ is a PROM for CTS and is the most commonly used outcome measure for CTS. Each item on the 11-item symptom severity scale (BCTQ-SSS) is graded from 1 (mildest) to 5 (most severe). Outcomes are typically recorded as a mean score.

For the primary analysis, change in BCTQ-SSS score will be tracked across the first five occasions of assessment (i.e. baseline - 1 month) and the patient-level average trend will be compared between randomized groups. As a secondary analysis, change in BCTQ-SSS will be tracked over the full duration of follow-up, with the primary focus being on outcomes up to 1 year.

Change from baseline to 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Measure the effect of USCTR vs mOCTR on the longitudinal change in hand grip strength.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months, and 12 months post CTR procedure

Manually tested using a handheld dynamometer.

Between the mOCTR and USCTR groups, will compare hand grip strength across each time point (i.e. baseline - 3 months; baseline - 12 months).

Change from baseline to 3 months, and 12 months post CTR procedure
Measure the effect of USCTR vs mOCTR on the longitudinal change in pinch (tip, palmar, and key) strength.
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months, and 12 months post CTR procedure

Manually tested using a pinch gauge.

Between the mOCTR and USCTR groups, will compare pinch (tip, palmar, and key) strength across each time point (i.e. baseline - 3 months; baseline - 12 months).

Change from baseline to 3 months, and 12 months post CTR procedure
Measure the impact of USCTR vs mOCTR on participant perception of change in overall physical condition
Time Frame: Change from 1 week to 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

Participant self reported change in physical condition. Participant will select one response from the following descriptions to rate overall condition from the time they began treatment to the designated time-point: A very great deal worse; About the same; A very great deal better; A great deal worse; A great deal better; Quite a bit worse; Quite a bit better; Moderately worse; Moderately better; Somewhat worse; Somewhat better; A little bit worse; A little bit better; A tiny bit worse(almost the same); A tiny bit better (almost the same)

The Global Rate of Change Scale (GROC) will be captured at nine occasions of assessment: baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-CTR. The primary focus will be on outcomes up to 1 year.

Change from 1 week to 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Change in military work status as assessed using single-item self-report assessment
Time Frame: Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

Participants will complete a questionnaire to depict when normal work or daily activities commenced.

The primary focus will be on outcomes up to 1 year.

Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Change in self-reported satisfaction as assessed using a satisfaction rating scale
Time Frame: Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

Participants will rate satisfaction with the following: completely dissatisfied, mostly dissatisfied, somewhat satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, somewhat satisfied, mostly satisfied, or completely satisfied.

Completely dissatisfied with represent the lowest score, and completely satisfied will represent the highest score.

Will compare participant satisfaction across arms in terms of symptom improvement, incision appearance, and recovery, with the primary focus being on outcomes up to 1 year.

Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Change in self-reported pain as assessed using the 11-item Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) participant pain levels over 1 month following the CTR procedure.
Time Frame: Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 1 month post CTR procedure
The 11-item NPRS scale is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. It is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale in which participants will select a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. worst possible pain).
Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 1 month post CTR procedure
Change in pain medication usage as assessed using single-item self-report assessment
Time Frame: Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure

Participant self-reported pain medication usage. Participant will respond with responses ranging from "less than once a week', "once a week", "several times a week", "daily", "multiple times per day", "or did not use". "Did not use" will represent the minimum value, and "multiple times per day" will represent the maximum value.

Participant self-reported pain medication usage (e.g., cumulative dosage, drug category, duration of use, etc.) will be captured at nine occasions of assessment: 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-CTR. The primary focus will be on outcomes up to 1 year.

Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post CTR procedure
Change in self-reported pain as assessed using the 11-item Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: At time of procedure, measured as day 0

Using the 11-item Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), compare the distributions of participant self-reported pain at both pre- and immediately -post CTR procedure between the USCTR and mOCTR groups.

The 11-item NPRS scale is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity. It is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale in which participants will select a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. no pain) to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. worst possible pain).

At time of procedure, measured as day 0
Change in self-reported pain as assessed using the modified 2-item CTS Palmar Pain Scale (4 items) over 1 month following CTR procedure
Time Frame: Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 1 month post CTR procedure
The modified 2-item CTS Palmar Pain Scale (4 items on palmar and incision pain) inquires about severity of pain. Each item has five-six possible response options which range from 1 (no pain) to 5/6 (very severe). The symptom score is the mean of all answered items; higher scores indicate worse symptoms
Captured at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 1 month post CTR procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Miller, MD, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel

Clinical Trials on mOCTR

Subscribe