Detection of Neuromuscular Complications in Critically Ill Patients (NMCiCIP)

November 1, 2022 updated by: Dr. Johannes Ehler, MD, University of Rostock

Value of Neuromuscular Ultrasound and Blood Biomarkers for the Detection, Monitoring and Prognostication of Neuromuscular Complications in Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective Single-center Observational Study

Dysphagia and the intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) are common and outcome-relevant neuromuscular complications in critically ill patients, especially after prolonged mechanical ventilation, sepsis and multi-organ failure. However, the impact of these two complications on the clinical course of critically ill patients needs further investigation.

Furthermore, the standard diagnostic procedure to detect and grade the acquired dysphagia using the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and the Medical Research Council sum score (MRC-ss) to detect ICU-AW are time-consuming and strongly dependent on patient compliance. An early and easy-to-use detection of these neuromuscular complications is currently difficult to be achieved in this patient population.

Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) and the measurement of neuromuscular damage blood biomarkers became increasingly interesting for clinical researchers in the recent years due to their broad availability and their simple and non-invasive application. However, the value of these new diagnostic tests to evaluate dysphagia and ICU-AW needs to be verified.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this single-center observational study the investigators aim to evaluate neuromuscular ultrasound and blood biomarkers of neuromuscular damage as innovative diagnostic features for the detection, monitoring and prognostication of dysphagia and ICU-AW in critically ill patients. A detailed neurological examination, NMUS as well as blood biomarker measurements (e.g. Myl3, TNNI1, FABP-3) will be longitudinally performed at study day 1 (day of study inclusion), day 3, day 10 and day 17 after study inclusion. The neurological examination comprises the use of validated scales (GCS, RASS, mRS) and scores (MRC-ss) to assess consciousness, neurological disability and muscle strength as well as the the examination of the reflex status. Using a standardized in-house NMUS protocol the facial (masseter muscle), submental (digastricus muscle, mylohyoid muscle), cervical (sternocleidomastoid muscle) and extremity muscles (biceps brachii, brachiradialis, quadriceps femoris, tibialis anterior) as well as the vagus nerve will be assessed repeatedly. Additionally, a FEES as the current gold standard diagnostic for dysphagia will be performed at study day 10 or as soon as possible (depending on the ability of the patient to cooperate with the examiner) after study day 10 to detect and grade the dysphagia.

All study participants will be reevaluated at day 90 after study inclusion with regard to functional disability and survival.

Furthermore, healthy volunteers will be recruited and assessed in the same way as patients including a clinical examination, NMUS, laboratory testing and FEES.

The investigators hypothezise that:

  • acquired dysphagia due to critical illness (not caused by central nervous system damage) is more likely in patients with ICU-AW
  • the outcome in patients with a combination of ICU-AW and dysphagia is worse compared to patients with only one of these entities
  • NMUS is able to detect and monitor dysphagia and ICU-AW in critically ill patients who are at risk of neuromuscular dysfunction
  • specific blood biomarker levels correlate with the severity of neuromuscular impairment and are of value to identify patients with ICU-AW and acquired dysphagia

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
      • Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany, 18057
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients admitted to the intensive care units of the study center will be screened for study eligibility according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additionally, healthy volunteers will be recruited to participate as controls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients above 17 years of age
  • Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥8 within the first two days after ICU admission
  • invasive mechanical ventilation ≥48 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no written informed consent from patient or legal representative
  • participation in another interventional study
  • patient transfer from another hospital (>1 day hospital stay)
  • preexisting swallowing disorder or disease of the larynx, pharynx or esophagus
  • previous surgery of the larynx, pharynx, esophagus or maxillofacial surgery
  • preexisting neuromuscular diseases
  • preexisting central nervous system diseases (stroke, hemorrhage, tumor, traumatic brain injury, brain surgery, epilepsy, hydrocephalus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Dysphagia-positive
  • critically ill patients more than 17 years of age
  • matching study inclusion criteria
  • confirmed newly acquired swallowing dysfunction using FEES at study day 10 or later
  • ICU-AW positive (MRC-ss <48) or ICU-AW negative (MRC-ss ≥48)
Dysphagia-negative
  • critically ill patients more than 17 years of age
  • matching study inclusion criteria
  • newly acquired swallowing dysfunction ruled out using FEES at study day 10 or later
  • ICU-AW positive (MRC-ss <48) or ICU-AW negative (MRC-ss ≥48)
Controls
  • healthy volunteers without any neuromuscular disease
  • swallowing dysfunction ruled out using FEES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of sensomotory dysphagia in critically ill patients with and without intensive care unit-acquired weakness as well as controls
Time Frame: Day 90
Assessment of dysphagia and ICU-AW using validated diagnostics (FEES, NMUS) and scores (MRC-ss)
Day 90
Changes in ultrasonographic parameters between patients with and without newly acquired sensomotory dysphagia as well as controls
Time Frame: Change from baseline ultrasound parameters at day 17
NMUS protocol performed at study days 1, 3, 10 and 17
Change from baseline ultrasound parameters at day 17
Change in neuromuscular damage blood biomarker levels in critically ill patients with and without newly acquired sensomotory dysphagia as well as controls
Time Frame: Change from baseline parameters at day 17
Specific blood biomarker levels (e.g. TNNI1, FABP-3) measured at study days 1, 3, 10 and 17
Change from baseline parameters at day 17

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life in patients with and without neuromuscular complications after hospital discharge
Time Frame: Day 90
Assessment of the overall quality of life using validated tests [e.g. Modified Rankin Scale with a range from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (dead)]
Day 90
Length of hospital stay comparing critically ill patients with and without neuromuscular complications
Time Frame: 1 year
Cumulative days in hospital
1 year
Survival in critically ill patients with and without neuromuscular complications
Time Frame: Day 28
Survival after 28 days
Day 28
Survival in critically ill patients with and without neuromuscular complications
Time Frame: Day 90
Survival after 90 days
Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix Klawitter, MD, University of Rostock

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NMCiCIP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

3
Subscribe