Effect of Baduanjin on Functional Performance in Pre-Frail/Frail Older Adults

January 31, 2024 updated by: Geriatric Education and Research Institute

Effect of Community-based Baduanjin (八段锦) on Functional Performance in Pre-Frail/Frail Older Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim for this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a 16-week realistic community-delivered Baduanjin training program compared to a waitlist control intervention, in improving functional outcomes among pre-frail and frail older adults in Singapore. It is hypothesized that participants that receive 16-week of BDJ training will have significant improvement in physical function (including balance, muscle strength, and endurance); alleviate exhaustion; reduce risk of falling and fear of falling; potentially reverse frailty; reduce depression; and improve quality of life, potentially with greater improvements in area(s) for individuals with lower baseline measures. Whereas, participants in the waitlist control group, will have insignificant changes to their baseline measures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Yong-en Care Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-frail and frail adults aged 55 years and above
  • Able to ambulate (move about) without personal assistance and has no other physical limitations affecting participation and adherence
  • Able to understand basic instructions
  • Generally sedentary lifestyle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in other intervention studies
  • Perform regular moderate to vigorous intensity exercise
  • Perform regular Taichi or Qigong exercise
  • Have severe audio-visual impairment
  • Diagnosed with cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia, Alzheimer's Disease) and/or history of neurological disorder (e.g. cerebral palsy, Parkinson's Disease)
  • Diagnosed with postural hypotension (have a drop of 20mmHg systolic blood pressure, or a drop of 10mmHg diastolic blood pressure within two to five minutes of standing up, or if standing causes signs and symptoms)
  • Unable to participate for the full duration of the study
  • Unable to come to the training site by himself/herself or by the help of caregivers
  • Not suitable to participate in exercise as deemed by a medical doctor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Intervention group will receive the 16-week Baduanjin exercise intervention.
Baduanjin (BDJ), also known as Eight-Section Brocades, is one of the forms of traditional Chinese Qigong exercises, characterized by symmetrical physical posture, movements, mindfulness, and breathing. Its primary focus is on the release of 'Qi' or internal body energy with the intent of improving health outcomes. BDJ encompasses eight simple movements involving combinations of postures, meditation, slow relaxing movements, and breathing exercises. It is a low intensity exercise, which have been found to improve range of motion, strength and general health. The simplicity and low intensity level is ideal for older adults to practice at home using instructional videos.
No Intervention: Control Group
Control group will not receive the exercise intervention, but they will attend four education classes about managing their health status.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Knee Extension Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Knee extension strength is measured using a digital dynamometer gauge. Prior to performing the test, leg dominant is determined by asking participants which is their dominant leg or which leg they would predominantly use when performing a task. For the assessment, participants will be asked to extend their leg against the spring gauge while seated with the hip and knee joint angles positioned at 90°. Maximal force is recorded in kilograms.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Maastricht Vital Exhaustion Score (MQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Maastricht vital exhaustion score (MQ) is a short questionnaires that requires between 5 to 10 minutes for completion. MQ is a validated tool to assess feelings of "vital exhaustion", which has three defining characteristics: (1) feeling of excessive fatigue and lack of energy, (2) increased irritability, and (3) feelings of demoralization.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a short, easy to administer tool that measures the fear of falling in older population during social and physical activities inside and outside the home. The level of concern is measured on a four point Likert scale (1=not at all concerned to 4=very concerned). The 16-item FES-I is a well validated and feasible measure to assess fear of falling in older persons, and predicts future risks of falls.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physiological Profile Assessment. (PPA - Short Form)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) is a valid and reliable measure of balance function and fall risk, is feasible for older adults to undertake, and can quantify changes in specific physical components contributing to falls in response to BDJ training. PPA comprises a series of five sensorimotor assessments: edge contrast sensitivity, lower limb proprioception, knee extension strength, hand reaction time, and postural sway. These five components will be weighted to compute a composite PPA fall risk score: high composite PPA scores indicate high risk of falling.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Hand Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Hand-grip dynamometer was found to be a valid tool in clinical and research practice, and is an easy, quick, and inexpensive way of assessing HGS in older adults. Prior to performing the hand-grip strength test, hand dominance is determined by asking participants which hand they use for writing or which hand they would predominantly use when performing a task. HGS is measured in kilograms by taking the average of the two dominant handgrip attempts using a Jamar Plus + Digital Hand Dynamometer.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in 6-meter Fast Gait Speed Test
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
The purpose of the gait speed test is to measure the participant's fastest speed while walking and mobility. Fast gait speed is determined across a distance of 6 meter, which is marked on the floor with tape. Subjects are allowed to use their usual walking aid. Two trails will be administered, time (in seconds) will be recorded for each trial. The average speed of two trails will be recorded as the fast gait speed.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Time Up and Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Time Up and Go test (TUG) is a reliable and valid test for quantifying functional mobility for frail elder person. The participant is observed and timed while he rises from an arm chair, walks 3 meters, turns, walks back, and sits down again. As the test is quick, and requires no special equipment or training, it is widely used in studies as a physical assessment.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in 30 seconds Sit-to-stand (STS)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Sit-to-stand (STS) test is a commonly used functional performance measure in clinical research and practice. STS performance is influenced by multiple physiological and psychological processes and represents a particular transfer skill, rather than a proxy measure of lower limb strength. In 30 seconds STS, participants will be asked to rise from the chair as fast as possible with their arms fold across their chest and the number of times they are able to perform sit-to-stand successfully within 30 seconds will be recorded. The performance of this test is suggested to be influenced by factors associated with balance, muscle strength, lower extremity endurance, and mobility as well.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Frailty Score
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Frailty score of the participants will be assessed based on the five criteria by Fried in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). The five criteria (modified for this pilot study) include: unintentional weight loss >10 lbs (4.5kg) and/or BMI of <18.5 in the last 6 months measured by self-report, weakness measured by knee extension strength, slowness measured by 6-m gait speed, exhaustion measured by questionnaire (SF-12), and physical inactivity measured by LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire. One-point is assign for the presence of each component, and based on the individual's total score, participants are categorized as frail (3-5 points), pre-frail (1-2 points), and robust (0 point). Reduction in frailty during the study is defined as a transition to a lower frailty category from baseline over 3 months.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in EuroQol-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
EQ-5D is one of the most commonly used generic health quality of life (QoL) status measurement, and its good validity and reliability have been reported in various health conditions. In this study, EQ-5D will be used as a standardized instrument for measuring generic health-related QoL.
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention
GDS is a 30-item self-report assessment used to identify depression in the elderly. One point is assigned to each answer and the cumulative score is rated on a scoring grid. The grid sets a range of 0-9 as "normal", 10-19 as "mildly depressed", and 20-30 as "severely depressed".
Baseline, and after 16-weeks of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TCMG BDJ RCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frail Elderly Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Baduanjin exercise program

3
Subscribe