Barrier-Protect Study

Barrier-Protect Study: Do Barrier Dressings Reduce Device Infection: a Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will evaluate the effect of an iodine impregnated barrier dressing on device pocket swab culture positivity. Minimizing contamination during the implant procedure can be one of the potential improvements to prevent CIED infections. Patients requiring a lead change, battery change or device upgrade will be eligible. This is a randomized, blinded study where participants will be randomized to having the barrier dressing applied before any incision is made (experimental group) or applying the dressing just prior to collecting the culture swab (control group). Patients and the staff taking the culture swab at the end of the procedure are blinded as to which group the participant is randomized to.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

390

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient aged 18
  2. Second or later procedure (including pulse generator change, lead revision and device upgrade procedures) involving manipulation of the pre-existing device pocket.
  3. PADIT risk score ≥ 5

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
  2. De novo device implantation.
  3. Active device infection.
  4. Iodine allergy
  5. Life expectancy less than 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
Standard skin prep prior to procedure will be performed and an adhesive iodine-infused barrier dressing will be applied post procedure but prior to taking the culture swab and closing the incision.
A barrier dressing will be applied either pre or post implant prior to a culture swab and closing the incision.
Experimental: Intervention
Standard skin prep prior to procedure plus an adhesive iodine-infused barrier dressing prior to incision, post procedure a culture swab will be taken and the incision closed.
A barrier dressing will be applied either pre or post implant prior to a culture swab and closing the incision.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
End of surgery pocket swab culture positivity
Time Frame: one month post procedure
To investigate end of procedure pocket swab culture positivity as a potential surrogate marker of device infection
one month post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CIED infection, defined as in the recent PADIT trial
Time Frame: Year 1 and 2 post procedure
  1. Pocket infection: Nosocomial surgical site infection will be defined according to the 2008 National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and US CDC definitions for superficial and deep surgical site infections (30)
  2. Endocarditis will be diagnosed according to the Modified Dukes' criteria (31). These were adapted by Klug D et al. to diagnose endocarditis in patients with implantable cardiac devices (32).
  3. Bloodstream infections will be defined according to 2008 NHSN and US CDC definitions for Primary bloodstream infections (33)
Year 1 and 2 post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alper Aydin, Dr., Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20200369-01H

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on Barrier dressing

3
Subscribe