Shockwave Assisted Large Bore Access

September 28, 2023 updated by: Mathew Wooster, Medical University of South Carolina

Shockwave Assisted Large Bore Access (TAVR, TEVAR, EVAR, FEVAR)

Annually, 150-200 TAVR with unilateral large bore access and 200 combined TEVAR/EVAR/FEVAR with bilateral large bore access are performed at our institution. Nearly 50 percent of patients fall outside IFU for access vessel size. Adjuncts described include iliac conduit, crack and pave, balloon expandable sheaths, direct aortic puncture, transcaval delivery, alternative access point (i.e axillary, carotid). Each of these adjuncts comes with additional complication potential and by nature of being used less frequently than the standard femoral access makes the procedure more challenging.

The intervention the use of the Shockwave Medical, Inc. Peripheral Lithoplasty® System to achieve large bore access in patients whose vessels fall outside of the IFU suggested dimensions.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Indicated for planned procedure requiring large bore (>12 French sheath) access
  • Mental capacity to provide informed consent
  • Iliac access vessel demonstrates >50% circumferential calcium
  • Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum inner lumen diameter less than IFU for device required
  • Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum outer wall diameter greater than or equal to IFU for device required
  • Preoperative CT angiogram, </= 5mm slices
  • Preoperative ABI/TP
  • Unsuccessful delivery of large bore sheath without adjunctive intervention

    o Definition of unsuccessful = operator assessment of the following

  • Visible distortion of iliac artery calcification under fluoroscopy without forward progress of device
  • Adverse forward pressure application by operator
  • Failure of device to track with external pressure applied to abdomen
  • Patient intolerance of advancement (pain response) in awake patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy (aspirin or plavix)
  • Planned iliofemoral surgical reconstruction in next 30 days
  • Prior common or external iliac artery stent placement
  • Prior aorto-iliac, aorto-femoral, or iliofemoral bypass present
  • Iliac access vessel demonstrates maximum outer wall diameter less than IFU for device required
  • Inability to obtain preoperative CTA (contrast allergy, CKD, etc)
  • Inability to traverse iliac segment with wire
  • Emergent procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard POBA (plain old balloon angioplasty)
The first 50 patients will be pre-treated with standard POBA
POBA
Experimental: Shockwave
The second 50 patients will be treated primarily with Shockwave
Shockwave Medical, Inc. Peripheral Lithoplasty® System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful advancement of planned large bore access device
Time Frame: Day 1
Technical success-defined as successful advancement of planned large bore access device without use of additional adjuncts (stenting, repeat shockwave treatment, high pressure balloon, alternative access pathway)
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathew Wooster, MD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00103170

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Plain old balloon angioplasty

3
Subscribe