Evaluation of Portal Vein Stenting in Patients With Portal Vein Stenosis and Gastrointestinal Cancers

February 8, 2024 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Prospective Evaluation of Portal Vein (PV) Stenting in Patients With PV Stenosis and Gastrointestinal Malignancies

This study collects information about the safety and effect of portal vein stenting in gastrointestinal cancer patients with portal vein stenosis. This study may help researchers learn how long the portal vein stays open and free from blockage and the effects of portal vein stenting on patients' overall well-being.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal vein stenting in patients with portal vein (PV) stenosis and gastrointestinal malignancies, including quality of life measurements.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Stent patency and duration of clinical success related to the intervention. II. Compare the efficacy of portal vein stenting on liver volumes, nutritional status, and laboratory values relative to patients with portal vein stenosis/thrombosis who do not undergo portal vein stenting.

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts.

COHORT A: Patients complete a quality of life (QoL) questionnaire at 2-4 weeks and then 6-8 weeks after portal vein stenting procedure. Patients' medical records are also reviewed.

COHORT B: Patients' medical records are reviewed retrospectively.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Joshua D. Kuban
          • Phone Number: 713-745-0944
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joshua D. Kuban

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Gastrointestinal cancer patients with portal vein stenosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COHORT A: All patients will undergo initial staging and treatment as per the institution standard of care. Patients will be considered eligible for porto-mesenteric venous stenting (PVS) if:

    • There is > 75% porto-mesenteric venous stenosis in either main portal vein (PV), left PV, right PV, or the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), even in absence of symptoms of portal hypertension
    • Patients presented with any degree of vascular narrowing of said vessels and symptomatic portal hypertension including variceal bleeding, refractory ascites, abdominal pain, intestinal edema, or diarrhea after exclusion of tumor-related causes as direct tumor invasion or peritoneal dissemination
  • COHORT B: Patients who have thrombosis/stenosis of the main portal vein but who did not undergo stenting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort A (questionnaire, medical record review)
Patients complete a QoL questionnaire at 2-4 weeks and then 6-8 weeks after portal vein stenting procedure. Patients' medical records are also reviewed.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Complete questionnaires
Review of medical records
Cohort B (medical record review)
Patients' medical records are reviewed retrospectively.
Review of medical records

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patency rate (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Defined by successful stent placement and described as N (%) of patients with corresponding exact 95% confidence interval.
Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Transfusion rate (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
N (%) of patients receiving transfusion with corresponding exact 95% confidence interval. Instances of multiple transfusions per patient will also be described.
Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Rate of paracenteses for ascites (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
N (%) of patients receiving paracenteses with corresponding exact 95% confidence interval. Instances of multiple paracenteses per patient will also be described.
Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Duration of clinical success (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Mean, median, standard deviation, and minimum/maximum values will be described.
Up to 8 weeks after stent placement
Change in nutritional status (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Based on albumin, pre-albumin, weight, body fat, and body surface area (BSA). Methods such as repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Tukey test and generalized estimating equations (GEE) will be used to assess pre- and post- differences.
Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Change in bleeding risk (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Based on platelet count and coagulation factors. Methods such as repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test and GEE will be used to assess pre- and post- differences.
Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Change in liver function (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Methods such as repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test and GEE will be used to assess pre- and post- differences.
Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Change in liver volume (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Methods such as repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test and GEE will be used to assess pre- and post- differences.
Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Change in quality of life (QoL) (Cohort A)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Will be assessed based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network - Hepatibiliary Symptom Index Questionnaire - 18 item. Methods such as repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey test and GEE will be used to assess pre- and post- differences. For QoL will also present effect size, defined as the magnitude of the differences in relation to the standard deviation of the scores, which will be reflective of the strength of the effect of portal stenting on QoL.
Baseline up to 30 days post procedure
Number of transfusions (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Number of paracentesis for ascites (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Liver volume (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Liver function (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Nutritional status (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Based on albumin, pre-albumin, weight, body fat, and BSA. Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Bleeding risk (Cohort A and B)
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks post procedure
Based on platelet count and coagulation factors. Methods such as paired t-tests, conditional logistic regression, and generalized linear modeling will be used to compare differences by cohort.
Up to 8 weeks post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua D Kuban, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PA18-0712 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2020-07171 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Digestive System Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe