Rectal Cancer Anastomosis 4 Check Study (REC4T)

Rectal Cancer 4 Check Study

Anastomotic failure (AF), including anastomotic leakage (AL), increases morbidity and mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. An inadequate perfusion of the anastomosis or technical stapling defects may contribute to AF. Several studies evaluated the singular use of intraoperative near infrared (NIR) indocyanine green (ICG)-induced fluorescence angiography (FA) and air leak testing to assess the integrity and the perfusion levels of the colorectal anastomosis. So far, a combined use of these methodologies, although acknowledged has not yet been tested as an indicator of postoperative AF or of intra-operative anastomotic repair in a prospective setting. This study aims to implement the intraoperative anastomotic assessment in a prospective series of patients undergoing rectal resection plus primary anastomosis for rectal cancer with or without ostomy, using a semi-quantitative check of 4 items (4-check). The procedure will include NIR-ICG-induced FA (to assess perfusion), air leak test and evaluation of the anastomotic donuts (to assess for the presence of technical defects). Included patients will be those scheduled for elective rectal resection with total or partial mesorectal excision and primary colo-rectal anastomosis with/or without protective ostomy. Primary outcomes will be the overall incidence of intra-operative anastomotic repair and the rate of post-operative AF. Secondary outcomes will be the overall incidence of adverse events and serious complications, the estimation of costs and resources, the operative time, hospitalization and post-operative measurement of inflammatory markers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All consecutive patients undergoing rectal resection (open and mini-invasive procedures) plus primary anastomosis for rectal cancer selected for the study will udergo a surgical intra-operative assessment of the anastomosis based on the check of the following 4 items (4-check):

  1. Extra-luminal (serosa) evaluation of the proximal colon and distal rectal stump perfusion based on a semi-quantitative assessment of the near infrared (NIR) indocyanine green (ICG)-induced fluorescence angiography (FA).
  2. Endo-luminal (mucosal) evaluation of the proximal colon and distal rectal stump perfusion based on a semi-quantitative assessment of the NIR-ICG-induced FA.
  3. Air leak test (extra-luminal and reverse).
  4. Assessment of the anastomotic donuts. aiming to test the efficacy of the procedure (overall incidence of intra-operative anastomosis repairs) and the overall incidence of anastomotic failure

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

287

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Selected patients will receive oral bowel preparation as for colonoscopy, 2 days before surgery and managed with ERAS protocol. Patients should be treated with rectal resection with TME or PME and mechanical anastomosis with a circular stapler, using one of the following approaches:

  1. Open surgery.
  2. Laparoscopic surgery (operations performed through small incisions and ports placements independently from the type and length of incision for specimen extraction).
  3. Robot-assisted surgery (using robotic systems to aid in surgical procedures independently from the type and length of incision for specimen extraction).
  4. TaTME. Mini-invasive bottom up approach for mesorectal dissection and colorectal anastomosis using a single/double team, independently from the type and length of incision for specimen extraction.

The following procedures is required during surgery:

Routine splenic flexure mobilization.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older.
  • Rectal adenocarcinoma or benign polyp with indication for rectal resection with total or partial mesorectal excision and primary colo-rectal anastomosis with/or without protective ostomy.
  • Patients undergoing upfront surgery and patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.
  • Patients with adequate performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale score of ≤2).
  • Patient must sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) before any study procedures and agrees to attend all study visits.
  • Selection of the patient before inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Patient pregnant or suspected pregnancy.

    • Patient with a comorbid illness or condition that would preclude the use of surgery.
    • Past medical history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).
    • Synchronous cancers requiring extended sub-total or total colectomies.
    • Long lasting therapy with steroids to be continued in the peri-operative period (4 weeks previous and 4 weeks after surgery).
    • Use of antiplatelet drug (anti-aggregant) and/or oral anti-coagulant drug to be continued in the peri-operative period (1 week previous and 4 weeks after surgery).
    • Patients assessed as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 4.
    • Patients with clinical stage of cT4b tumor after neoadjuvant theapy.
    • Metastatic disease (clinical Stage 4).
    • Patient undergoing emergency procedures.
    • Planned colonic surgery along with major concomitant procedures (i.e. liver resections, other intestinal resections).
    • Previous colon surgery (excluding appendectomy).
    • Non-restorative procedures (i.e. Miles or Hartman resection).
    • Colo-anal manual anastomosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
REC4T study patients
Rectal adenocarcinoma or polyp with indication for resection and primary colo-rectal mechanical anastomosis using a circular stapler with/or without protective ostomy undergoing upfront surgery and patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (see Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria)
Extra-luminal (serosa) and Endo-luminal (mucosal) evaluation of the proximal colon and distal rectal stump perfusion based on a semi-quantitative NIR-ICG-induced FA. This will be conducted administering IV a bolus of 3.75 to 7.5 mg of ICG and evaluated using a Fluorescence Imaging System; following after completion of the anastomosis a second bolos of 3.75 to 7.5 mg of ICG will be administered IV and the anastomosis will be visualized by insertion of the system trans-anally. Colon and rectal segments and quadrants will be scored for any defect of perfusion.
Other Names:
  • Near Infrared Fluorescence angiography
  • indocyanine green
This will be conducted insufflaying air in the anastomosis through a proctoscope, tube or a flexible endoscope, after filling of the pelvis with saline solution and luminal occlusion of the intestine proximal to the anastomosis. Also, the anastomosis will be checked transanally for the presence of air leak.
The assessment of the anastomotic rings following mechanical anastomosis will be recorded as complete/incomplete

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intra-operative anastomosis repairs
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
defined as additional suturing or re-do anastomosis
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Rate of 30 day-anastomotic failure (AF)
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
defined as anastomotic-related morbidity, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, anastomotic-related fistula, sinus, and anastomotic stricture
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of of adverse events
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
any medical or surgical complications
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Rate of 30-day major complications
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb-IV
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Measure of costs
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Costs resource utilization for the procedure
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Medan length of post-operative stay
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
post-operative stay (measured in days)
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measurement
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
measurement conducted in postoperative days 1, 3 & 5 (optional) using mg/L
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement
Time Frame: 01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022
measurement conducted in postoperative days 1, 3 & 5 (optional) using mg/L ng/mL
01/01/2021 to 31/12/2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roberto Persiani, MD, Fondazione Policlinico Universitarioa A Gemelli IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

3
Subscribe