Causal Evidence for Task Regulation by Anterior Cingulate Cortex

December 3, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent
The exact function of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is one of the largest riddles in cognitive neuroscience and a major challenge in mental health research. ACC dysfunction contributes to a broad spectrum of neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as depression, ADHD, Parkinson's disease, OCD and many others, but nobody knows what it actually does. Recently a new theory has been developed about ACC function; the HRL-ACC (Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Theory of ACC). This theory proposes that the ACC selects and motivates high-level tasks based on the principles of hierarchical reinforcement learning. The ACC associates values with tasks (these values are based on the reward positivity produced by the midbrain dopamine system), selects the correct tasks and applies control over other neural networks (such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia), which execute the tasks. The goal of this study is to investigate the consequences of ACC damage (and other areas of the frontal lobe) on task regulation within a group of patients who have suffered a stroke in the frontal lobe. Furthermore, the correlation between ACC damage and mood disorders such as depression and apathy is going to be investigated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a monocentric prospective interventional clinical trial that will include patients with a stroke in the frontal lobe. Depending on the recruitment manner, participants will undergo one or two sessions of cognitive experiments. The patients will be recruited in two ways, through the Stroke unit and through the outpatient clinic:

  1. If a patient with an acute stroke in the frontal lobe is admitted to the Stroke unit and is eligible for this study, the patient will be asked if he is willing to participate. After giving informed consent, the first session will take place once the patient has been transferred to a regular neurological ward. After discharge, a second session will take place 6 to 12 months later at the outpatient clinic, preferably combined with a consultation (as part of the standard of care of stroke patients).
  2. Patients who have had a stroke are followed at the outpatient clinic. Patients who are eligible for this study, will be contacted by the treating stroke supervisor during their consultation (either Prof. Veerle De Herdt or Dr. Dimitri Hemelsoet). If they are willing to participate, the first session will take place either right after the consultation at the outpatient clinic, or - if the patient is not available at that time - a new appointment will be made.

One experimental session consists of the following steps:

  • Clinical neurological examination with determining of NIHSS score.
  • First cognitive task: the coffee-tea task. During this task, a sequence of 7 images is shown and each image contains three objects. The patient has to choose the right objects to make either coffee or tea. At the end of each sequence they get feedback if they have prepared the beverage correctly or not.
  • Short break with positioning of 21 EEG electrodes.
  • Second task: the virtual T-maze task with video-EEG recording. During this task, a virtual T-maze is shown and the patient has to choose at each junction whether they go left or right. Depending on which direction they choose, they either get positive or negative feedback. This task is known to elicit the reward positivity. During this task, video-EEG will be recorded and this EEG-data will later on be analysed using ERP analysis.
  • If second session, administering of questionnaires: Oxford Cognitive Screen, Becker Depression Inventory, DEX apathy questionnaire.

Furthermore, the investigators are going to use voxel-based lesion symptom mapping to analyze the relationship between tissue damage and behavioural problems and reward positivity amplitude.

It is expected that the coffee-tea task will be more difficult for patients with ACC damage compared to patients with lesions in other areas of the frontal lobe. Also, the amplitude of the ERP signals during the virtual T-maze task will be smaller in patients with ACC damage. Furthermore, the investigators expect to find a connection between ACC damage and mood disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital, department of neurology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke patients: ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage
  • Involvement of the frontal lobe
  • Lesion is visible on CT and/or MRI and is concordant with clinical presentation during the time of onset
  • Patients have to be able to give informed consent themselves

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a TIA, i.e. no visible lesion on CT and/or MRI or symptoms less than 24 hours
  • Patients with decreased alertness or disorders of consciousness, which makes it impossible for these patients to participate in the experiments
  • Active alcohol and/or drug abuse/addiction
  • Patients diagnosed with dementia or another neurodegenerative disease, or severe cognitive and/or psychiatric disorders that make it impossible for these patients to participate in the study
  • Patients with severe aphasia (as defined by NIHSS score)
  • A history of stroke in the frontal lobe is NOT an exclusion criteria (except when the patient has been diagnosed with poststroke frontal dysfunction).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Each participant will undergo one or two sessions, consisting of cognitive tasks, video-EEG recording and administering of questionnaires.
Patients will perform the coffee-tea task and the virtual T-maze task, both in the acute and chronic phase after stroke.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and type of mistakes made during the coffee-tea task
Time Frame: date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months
Analysed and compared within sub-groups (classified by using Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping)
date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months
Amplitude of reward positivity Event-Related Potential signals
Time Frame: date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months
Relationship between reward positivity amplitude and brain damage, investigated by using Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping.
date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months
Neurofunctional status
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months after stroke
Neurofunctional status as defined by the Oxford Cognitive Score, a scale ranging from 0 to 138 (the higher the score, the better the neurofunctional status)
6 to 12 months after stroke
Presence of depression
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months after stroke
Presence and severity of depression, evaluated by using the Becker Depression Inventory, a scale that scores from 0 to 63 (the higher the score, the more severe the depression).
6 to 12 months after stroke
Presence of apathy
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months after stroke
Presence and severity of apathy, evaluated by using the DEX (Dysexecutive) Questionnaire, a scale that scores from 0 to 80 and that is filled in both by the patient and the independent caretaker (e.g. family, friend). The higher the score, the more severe the apathy and dysexecutive problems.
6 to 12 months after stroke

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance of coffee-tea task in subgroup with ACC lesions
Time Frame: date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months
Comparing the results of the coffee-tea task performed by the ACC-subgroup to the results of the other subgroups, by using Voxel-based Lesion Symptom Mapping, and therefore assessing the crucial role of ACC on task regulation.
date of inclusion to date of second session, assessed up to 6 to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Veerle De Herdt, University Hospital Ghent, Department of Neurology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BC-08764

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Cognitive tasks

3
Subscribe