- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04651114
Pilot Testing a New Pregnancy Decision Making Tool for Women With Physical Disabilities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- The University of Michigan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physical disability, defined by loss or impairment of physical function limiting one or more important life activities
- Mild, moderate or severe disability severity; severity will be assessed based on the need for assistance with daily life activities and/or personal care
- Actively planning or in the process of making a decision about whether or not to get pregnant in the near future.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Decision-making tool
Women will receive the decision making tool and use for a 3 month period.
|
Women will be directed to a secure website to download a copy of the decision making tool and worksheets (they can download as many copies as they wish to). The women will use the tool and worksheets at their own pace for the pilot study period. The decision making tool is a 23-page tool and set of 9 downloadable worksheets. The tool covers topics relevant to women with disabilities in considering or planning a pregnancy: 1) Overview of Pregnancy: 2) Knowing what is important; 3) Partners, family and important relationships; 4) Physical function and independence; 5) Health and wellbeing; 6) Caring for an infant; 7) Financial resources & insurance; 8) How to find reliable information and resources; 9) Connecting with other women with physical disabilities; 10) Dealing with reactions of others, stigma and bias, pressure; and 11) Reaching a decision. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Values Clarity Sub-scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure.
Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action.
For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy.
The Values Clarity sub-scale refers to how much a respondent is clear about the values that guide their decision-making.
Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree [5] to strongly disagree [1]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15.
Higher scores represent greater clarity of values.
|
12 weeks
|
Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Support Sub-scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure.
Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action.
For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy.
The Support for Decision Making sub-scale refers to how much support a respondent has from others about their decision-making.
Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree [5] to strongly disagree [1]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15.
Higher scores represent greater support for decision-making.
|
12 weeks
|
Final Decisional Conflict Scale Score - Uncertainty Sub-scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale is a self-report measure.
Decisional conflict refers to a state of uncertainty about a course of action.
For this study, this refers to uncertainty about pursuing a future pregnancy.
The Uncertainty about the decision sub-scale refers to how much a respondent is uncertain about the decision.
Sub-scale items (3) are rated on 5-point Likert scales (ranging from strongly agree [5] to strongly disagree [1]) and summed for a total score range of 3 to 15.
Higher scores represent greater certainty about the decision.
|
12 weeks
|
Final Readiness to Make a Choice in Stage of Decision-Making Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Stage of Decision Making is a single item self-report measure.
The options range from "haven't begun to think about choices" to "have already made a decision and unlikely to change my mind".
The instructions were modified to refer to pregnancy and excluded the first two options of not having begun to think about choices given inclusion criteria.
For this study, the scale ranged from 1 (are considering the decision now) to 4 (have already made a decision and am unlikely to change my mind).
A higher score reflects greater readiness to make a decision.
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Feasibility - Acceptability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Acceptability of decision making tool is refers to whether the intervention is agreeable or satisfactory.
In this study we measured this by self-report.
We used 11 items that measured the presentation of information of the tool rated on Likert scales ranging from 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent) which are summed across all items.
Possible scores can range from 11 to 44, with higher scores reflecting better information presentation.
|
12 weeks
|
Feasibility - Demand
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Demand refers to the likelihood of using an intervention after the study is over.
For this study, it is a single item rated on Likert scales of 1 (definitely not likely) to 5 (very likely).
Higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of using the tool after the study is over.
|
12 weeks
|
Feasibility - Ease of Use
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Ease of use refers to how easy an intervention is to use.
In this study, we measures ease of use of the tool with a self-report, single item rated on Likert scales ranging from 1 (very hard) to 5 (very easy).
A higher rating means the tool was considered easier to use.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claire Kalpakjian, PhD, MS, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00189778
- R21HD092526 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Disability Physical
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruitingDisability Physical | Physical InactivityUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedPhysical Activity | Physical DisabilityFrance
-
Washington University School of MedicineRecruitingPhysical DisabilityUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Recruiting
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamRecruiting
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingDisability PhysicalUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...Active, not recruiting
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedPhysical DisabilityUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...Completed
-
Brooke Army Medical CenterCompletedPhysical DisabilityUnited States
Clinical Trials on Decision-making tool
-
University of MichiganThe Craig H. Neilsen FoundationCompletedPregnancy Related | Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingCritically Ill | Delirium Confusional State | Agitation,Psychomotor | Intensive Care Unit DeliriumFrance
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkJohns Hopkins University; Baylor College of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania and other collaboratorsTerminatedKnee OsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)RecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Patient EngagementUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)WithdrawnBreast Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Lung CancerUnited States
-
University College, LondonUnknown
-
University of Texas at AustinCompleted
-
Taipei Medical UniversityUnknownShared Decision Making | Self-Efficacy for Decision MakingTaiwan
-
Taipei Medical UniversityCompletedShared Decision Making | Quality of Care | Patient Decision Aids | Evidence-based Medicine | Lumbar Degenerative DiseaseTaiwan
-
Queen's University, BelfastNorthern Ireland Chest Heart and StrokeCompleted