Hemoglobin Level, Coagulopathy Profile and Electrolyte Balance

November 30, 2020 updated by: Alaa Hassan M. Elhawary

Comparing the Changes in Hemoglobin Level, Coagulopathy Profile and Electrolyte Balance in Large Volume Liposuction Patients But in Different Surface Areas.

What is Impact of Amount Versus Surface Area of Liposuction on Haematological Parameters, Coagulopathy Profile and Electrolyte Balance? Liposuction involves the creation of extensive subsurface trauma, comparable in many respects to the massive injury of an internal burn. Liposuction commences with cannula aspiration of several liters of fluid-engorged adipose tissue, during which small feeder vessels are inevitably torn.

Operating on multiple areas increases the area of injury regardless of whether just small amounts of fat are removed. Because many of the complications associated with large volume liposuction are related to fluid shifts and fluid balance, classifying the procedure based on the total volume removed from the patient, including fat, wetting solution, and blood, makes more sense to evaluate the damage made by the procedure.

Safety and aesthetic issues define large-volume liposuction as having a 5,000-ml aspirate, mega-volume liposuction as having an 8,000-ml aspirate, and giganto-volume liposuction as having an aspirate of 12,000 ml or more.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Liposuction is fat- removing aesthetic surgery procedure that aims to body contouring. Liposuction is the most frequently performed aesthetic surgery procedure in Western Countries. This technique has had rapid development since the 1970s, when it was experimented for the first time by A. and G. Fischer. It is currently widely used in clinical practice for many different situations in aesthetic, reconstructive and functional fields.

At 1970s, fat removal was carried out with a blunt curette. This technique was modified in 1977 by a French surgeon, Yves Gerard Illouz, who added hyaluronidase and saline to emulsify the fatty tissue, and hence facilitate aspiration with the use of liposuction cannula. This was termed the 'wet technique' and was introduced to reduce blood loss during the procedure.

The current options for wetting solutions are dry, wet, superwet, and tumescent. The dry technique employs no wetting solution and has few indications in liposuction. The wet technique involves instillation of 200 to 300 mL of solution per area to be treated, regardless of the amount aspirated. The superwet technique employs an infiltration of 1 mL per estimated mL of expected aspirate, and this is the technique practiced at our institution. Tumescent infiltration, popularized by Klein, involves infiltration of wetting solution that creates significant tissue turgor and results in infiltration of 3 to 4 mL of wetting solution per mL aspirated. Regardless of technique, the infiltrate should be allowed to take effect for seven minutes prior to suctioning.

Most studies consider the most important parameter, to determine the safety of liposuction, is the amount (volume) of aspirated fluid. A review of the scientific literature shows that there are no scientific data available to support a specific volume maximum at which point liposuction is no longer safe, although the risk of complications is unavoidably higher as the volume of aspirate and the number of anatomic sites treated increase.

Safety and aesthetic issues define large-volume liposuction as having a 5,000-ml aspirate, mega-volume liposuction as having an 8,000-ml aspirate, and giganto-volume liposuction as having an aspirate of 12,000 ml or more.

In large volume liposuction, there is potential for large fluid shifts secondary to the volume of tissue removed, with a risk of developing pulmonary edema, high-volume liposuction is significantly more prone to complications than the original form of liposuction.

There is a long history of debate over the safe volume of fat tissue that can be removed by liposuction. Current ASPS guidelines define 5,000 milliliters (five liters) as "large-volume liposuction" potentially associated with a higher risk of complications. But the guidelines acknowledge there is no scientific data to support an absolute cutoff point. Patients with complications had larger liposuction volumes-average 3.4 liters-and higher BMIs. Patients undergoing "large-volume" liposuction of more than five liters had a higher overall complication rate: 3.7 versus 1.1 percent.

On the other hand, liposuction involves the creation of extensive subsurface trauma, comparable in many respects to the massive injury of an internal burn. Liposuction commences with cannula aspiration of several liters of fluid-engorged adipose tissue, during which small feeder vessels are inevitably torn.

Only few studies have mentioned the effect of surface area on liposuction and none of those studies have been published at certified impacted magazine.

In this study considers the amount of liposuction is a constant factor (Large volume liposuction) and the surface area is the variant to detect the changes in hemogram, coagulation profile and electrolyte imbalance that may lead to possible complication.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Assuit
      • Assiut, Assuit, Egypt, 71515
        • Recruiting
        • Assuit University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

To assess the impact of amount, up to 8 litres, versus surface area of liposuction on haematological parameters, coagulopathy profile and electrolyte balance.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female patient.
  2. Age: 25-45 years.
  3. BMI <40
  4. Large volume liposuction
  5. Patient asking for liposuction or suction assisted lipoectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Male patient.
  2. Age >45 or <25 years.
  3. Uncontrolled chronic diseases as DM, HTN.
  4. Show degrees of lipodystropy at breast.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the blood hemoglobin level pre, intra and post operative between two groups of patients, both have done large volume liposuction, with different surface areas liposuctioned.
Time Frame: 1 year

To compare the impact of large volume liposuction (5 to 8 liters) from different body surface areas on the patient's hemoglobin level preoperatively, intraoperative and postoperatively.

The surface area will be calculated according to Lund and Browder chart by percentage (the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury) The volume is measured by Liters. Hemoglobin level is measured by g/dl.

1 year
Comparing the coagulation profile (mainly prothrombin concentration and INR) pre, intra and post operative between two groups of patients, both have done large volume liposuction, with different surface areas liposuctioned.
Time Frame: 1 year

To compare the impact of large volume liposuction (5 to 8 liters) from different body surface areas on the patient's Coagulopathy Profile (prothrombin concentration, INR) preoperatively, intraoperative and postoperatively.

The surface area will be calculated according to Lund and Browder chart by percentage (the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury) The volume is measured by Liters. The coagulation profile includes mainly prothromin concentration( measured by percentage) and INR.

1 year
Comparing potassium serum ions level pre, intra and post operative between two groups of patients, both have done large volume liposuction, with different surface areas liposuctioned.
Time Frame: 1 year

To compare the impact of large volume liposuction (5 to 8 liters) from different body surface areas on the patient's electrolyte balance preoperatively, intraoperative and postoperatively.

The surface area will be calculated according to Lund and Browder chart by percentage (the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury)

The volume is measured by Liters.

The electrolyte, that are included in the study, is potassium ions measured by mmol/L.

1 year
Comparing the blood hematocrit level pre, intra and post operative between two groups of patients, both have done large volume liposuction, with different surface areas liposuctioned.
Time Frame: 1 year.

To compare the impact of large volume liposuction (5 to 8 liters) from different body surface areas on the patient's hemoglobin level preoperatively, intraoperative and postoperatively.

The surface area will be calculated according to Lund and Browder chart by percentage (the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury) The volume is measured by Liters. Hematocrit level is measured by percentage.

1 year.
Comparing the sodium serum ions level pre, intra and post operative between two groups of patients, both have done large volume liposuction, with different surface areas liposuctioned.
Time Frame: 1 year.

To compare the impact of large volume liposuction (5 to 8 liters) from different body surface areas on the patient's electrolyte balance preoperatively, intraoperative and postoperatively.

The surface area will be calculated according to Lund and Browder chart by percentage (the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury)

The volume is measured by Liters.

The electrolyte, that are included in the study, is sodium ions measured by mmol/L.

1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Assem H. Abdelhafez, professor, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • large volume liposuction

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on liposuction

3
Subscribe