The RADAR Study - Wearable-Based Dysglycemia Detection and Warning in Diabetes (RADAR)

September 13, 2022 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
The study RADAR aims at developing a wearable based dysglycemia detection and warning system for patients with diabetes mellitus using artificial intelligence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prior research has investigated the general potential of data analytics and artificial intelligence to infer blood glucose levels from a variety of data sources. In this study patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus will be wearing a continuous glucose meter (CGM) and a smartwatch for a maximum duration of 3 months in an outpatient setting. The gathered data will be used to develop a non-invasive and wearable based dysglycemia detection and warning system using artificial intelligence.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smartwatch cannot be attached around the wrist of the patient
  • Known allergies to components of the Garmin smartwatch or the Dexcom G6 system
  • Pregnancy, intention to become pregnant or breast feeding
  • Cardiac arrhythmia (e.g. atrial flutter or fibrillation, AV-reentry tachycardia, AV-block > grade 1)
  • Pacemaker or ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator)
  • Treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs or beta-blockers
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • Physical or psychological disease likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results as judged by the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting dysglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L and glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC-ROC)
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting severe hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.0 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based physiological data in detecting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and physiological data recorded by the smartwatch compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting dysglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L and glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting severe hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.0 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+ model: Diagnostic accuracy of wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in detecting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR+-model will be assessed using machine learning technology and wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to continuous glucose measurements (ground truth)
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting glucose levels quantified as the mean absolute error.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting dysglycemia (glucose>13.9mmol/L and glucose<3.9 mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting severe hyperglycemia (glucose > 13.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting mild hypoglycemia (glucose < 3.9mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR-forecast model: Diagnostic accuracy of CGM data in combination with wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) in forecasting severe hyperglycemia (glucose < 3.0mmol/L) quantified as AUC-ROC.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Accuracy of the RADAR forecasts will be assessed using machine learning technology, historical continuous glucose measurements data, and historical wearable based data (physiological, time, fasting glucose, and motion) compared to future continuous glucose measurements (ground truth).
4-12 weeks
Change of sleep pattern in dysglycemia (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Sleep pattern will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Change of heart rate in dysglycemia (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Heart rate will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Change of heart rate variability (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Heart rate variability will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Change of skin temperature (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Skin temperature will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Change of electrodermal activity (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Electrodermal activity will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Change of stress level (< 3.9 mmol/l and > 13.9 mmol/l) compared to eugylcemia.
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Stress level will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Influence of sleep duration on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Sleep duration will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Influence on stress-level on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Stress level will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Influence on activity (number of steps and stairs climbed per day) on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10 mmol/L)
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Number of steps and stairs climbed per day will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
Influence of movement on daily time in glycemic target range (3.9 - 10.0 mmol/l)
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
Movement will be recorded by the smartwatch and glucose values are measured with the continuous glucose meter (CGM).
4-12 weeks
24. Analysis of user requirements for smartwatch based dysglycemia warning systems
Time Frame: 4-12 weeks
User requirements for the smartwatch based dysglycemia warning system will be assessed in a semi-quantitative interview.
4-12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Stettler, Prof. MD, University of Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 19, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 28, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Wearing smartwatch and continous glucose sensor

3
Subscribe