Appropriate Inhaler Use of Tiotropium as add-on Therapy in Symptomatic Asthma

January 9, 2021 updated by: Ting-Yu Lin, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Appropriate Inhaler Use of Tiotropium as add-on Therapy to Inhaled Glucocorticoids (ICS) With Long-acting Beta-agonists (LABA) in Adult Patients With Symptomatic Asthma: The Impact of Checking and Correcting Inhaler Technique in Real World

This pragmatic, two-arm, randomized controlled trial study aim to survey the inhaler errors of add-on tiotropium therapy with ICS+LABA in real-world practice of asthma patients and the efficacy of recheck stratage of inhaler skills. Patient characteristics and inflammatory features will be evaluated prospectively for association of asthma control by add-on tiotropium.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. The clinical efficacy of tiotropium as add-on treatment to ICS with a LABA have been demonstrated in clinical trials in adult patients with symptomatic asthma.
  2. Certain patients of daily care, like patients with smoking asthma, late onset asthma or asthma with chronic airway obstruction are often excluded from clinical trials.
  3. Studies have shown the cognitive function of patients with COPD is impaired. When mixed types of inhaler devices are prescribed, the multiple steps of different devices may ensure complexity and confusion for patients, which may compromise the efficacy of add-on therapy. The inhaler error of add-on tiotropium treatment in real-world asthma treatment is unknown.
  4. The improvement of step errors after varieties of teaching intervention is around 30~50%. Strategy of recheck inhaler technique recommended by the treatment guideline may optimized inhaler use. (https://ginasthma.org/gina-reports/).
  5. Factors like responseness of short-acting bronchodilators and cholinergic tone have been reported as predictors of a positive clinical response of add-on tiotropium. However, more specific physiological or inflammatory factors. e.g. exhaled nitric oxide test (FeNo), and para symptomatic function and cardiac-pulmonary interaction have not been evaluated prospectively.
  6. This pragmatic, two-arm, randomized controlled trial study aim to survey the inhaler errors of add-on tiotropium therapy with ICS+LABA in real-world practice of asthma patients and the efficacy of recheck stratage of inhaler skills. Patient characteristics and inflammatory features will be evaluated prospectively for association of asthma control by add-on tiotropium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 20 to 75 years old asthmatic patients under regular treatment
  2. Received medium to high dose ICS with LABA at least 3 months
  3. Persistent asthma related symptoms: asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-7>1.5)
  4. Physicians in charged prescribed Tiotropium as add-on therapy according to clinical judgement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refuse to provide inform consent
  2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  3. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  4. Using other Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists e.g. Sebree, Ultibro, Anoro and Spiolto

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Correct/recheck strategy
Patients of study arm will be asked to show how they use their two inhalers and identify errors using a device-specific checklist by research assistant. Research assistant then show the patient how to use these devices correctly and give the checklist including the steps patients did wrong. After teaching by the research assistant, patients were asked to demonstrate the correct way of wrong step(s) they made at beginning.
One month after recruitment and every 3 months. 1. Check the inhaler step errors of patients by research assistant; 2.Demonstrate the right way by research assistant; 3. give the inhaler check list with marks of the wrong step(s) patients made to patients and 4. confirm the patients do the right way of the previous wrong step(s).
Active Comparator: Usual verbal instruction
Patients of control arm will be asked to show how thy use their two inhalers and identify errors using specific check list by research assistant. The educational nurse will give verbal instruction.
One month after recruitment and every 3 months.1. Check the inhaler step errors of patients by research assistant; 2. Verbal instruction with a physical demonstration will be given by educational nurse in usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Errors rate of Inhaler steps
Time Frame: 3 months
The improvement of inhaler steps errors after recheck stratage after 3 month of add-on tiotropium and ICS+LABA
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Asthma control
Time Frame: 3 months
The improvement of asthma control evaluated by Asthma Control Test (ACT). The scores range from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score >19 indicates well-controlled asthma.
3 months
Asthma control
Time Frame: 3 months

The improvement of asthma control evaluated by Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7).

ACQ-7 is 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment for symptoms and rescue use; and 7 categories for FEV1%)

3 months
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) before bronchodilation
Time Frame: 3 months
The improvement of FEV1 before bronchodilation evaluated by spirometry after 3 month of add-on tiotropium and ICS+LABA
3 months
Acute exacerbation
Time Frame: 3, 6,9 and 12 month
The rate of acute exacerbation in one year
3, 6,9 and 12 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of the errors rate of Inhaler steps and mini-cog score
Time Frame: 1 month

The mini-cog score will be evaluated when patient recruitment. The mini-cog is score of five-points in total, a score of zero, one or two indicates a concern in cognitive functioning.

The error of inhaler steps will be recorded one month after 3 month of add-on tiotropium and ICS+LABA.

Correlation will be tested via Pearson's test or Sperman rank correlation test.

1 month
Correlation of the errors rate of Inhaler steps and poor asthma control
Time Frame: 3 month

The error of inhaler steps will be recorded one month after add-on tiotropium therapy.

Asthma control will be evaluated by Asthma Control Test (ACT) 3 months after 3 month of add-on tiotropium and ICS+LABA.

Correlation will be tested via Pearson's test or Sperman rank correlation test. The distribution of errors rate of inhaler steps between patients with asthma well control (ACT>19) and patients with asthma poor control (ACT<=19) will be tested by Mann-Whitney test.

3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ting-Yu Lin, Chest department, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Correct/recheck strategy

3
Subscribe