Localized Muscle Vibration Post Stroke

June 11, 2023 updated by: Giuseppe Annino

Efficacy of Localized Muscle Vibration on Lower Extremity Functional Ability in Patients With Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and objectives: Lower extremity functional impairments are common consequences of stroke. Thus, continuous examination of effective treatment interventions for lower extremity functions after stroke is a necessity. Localized muscle vibration (LMV) is one of the treatment interventions that incorporate sensory stimulation to improve motor cortical excitability. This study aimed to investigate the influences of 10-minutes lower extremity LMV application along with conventional physical therapy (CPT) on activities of daily living (ADL) and motor recovery on the hemiparetic lower extremity post-stroke.

Methods: A sample of 37 patients with stroke (8 females) was randomly allocated to either conventional physical therapy (CPT) control group (n=18) or conventional physical therapy and localized muscle vibration (CPT+LMV) experimental group (n=19). All patients received 3 sessions per week of CPT for 8 weeks. The CPT+LMV experimental group received 10-minute LMV at the end of each CPT session. The outcome measures used were the Barthel Index (BI), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and goniometry for Range of Motion (ROM) assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 10 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • RM
      • Rome, RM, Italy, 00133
        • Policlinico Tor Vergata

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed diagnosis of stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

If they had any serious orthopedic injury/disease, cardiopulmonary problems or suffered from a neurological disease (other than stroke).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conventional physical therapy intervention plus localized muscle vibration
physical therapy intervention plus localized muscle vibration
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training
Sham Comparator: Conventional physical therapy intervention
physical therapy intervention
All patients in both experimental and control groups received CPT protocol consisted of 30 minutes of manual resistance exercise (3 sets/10 repetitions each for knee extensors and flexors) and 30 minutes of treadmill training, short breaks (1-5 minutes) were allowed, depending on the patient tolerance. The training was conducted for 3 days per week for 8 weeks. The patients in CPT+LMV experimental group received localized muscle vibration at the end of each CPT session. The LMV was applied for 5 minutes perpendicularly along quadriceps muscle fibers. The frequency set at 30 Hz, amplitude of 2 mm.
Other Names:
  • manual resistance exercise
  • treadmill training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barthel Index (BI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline activity of daily livings at 8 weeks
The Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI). Measure of functional disability. The BI consisting of 10 common activities of daily living (ADL) activities, administered through direct observation. These are assessed for independence/ dependence and scored via an arbitrary weighting system (originally applied to reflect nursing care and social acceptability). Eight of the ten items represent activities related to personal care; the remaining 2 are related to mobility. The index yields a total score out of 100 - the higher the score, the greater the degree of functional independence
Change from baseline activity of daily livings at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline balance at 8 weeks
The BBS provides a quantitative measure of balance. This scale consists of 14 items requiring patients to maintain their positions or complete tasks of varying levels of difficulty. All items are related to everyday life tasks. A score of zero represents an inability of the patient to complete the task and a score of 4 represents the ability of the patient to complete the task independently. The total scores range from 0 - 56. A total score of less than 45 indicates a balance impairment.
Change from baseline balance at 8 weeks
Goniometry
Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks
Range of motion assessed by goniometry; is the measurement of angles, particularly those formed by joints. These angles may be measured in a standing position or in flexion or extension.
Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks
Manual Muscle Testing
Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks
The MMT was used to assess muscle strength. The MMT consists of 6 grades. Grade 0 indicates no evidence of contractility (complete paralysis), and 5 indicates movement against gravity plus full resistance.
Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks
The MAS was utilized to measure spasticity. The scale asses the resistance of limb to a rapid passive stretch in 6 scores from 0 to 5. Score 0 indicates normal muscle tone, and 5 indicates rigid limb.
Change from baseline range of motion at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Giuseppe Annino, PhD, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Localized muscle vibration

3
Subscribe