Efficacy of a Smartphone App. Designed to Manage Craving & Individual Predictors of Substance Use/Addictive Behavior (CRAVINGMANAGER)

Efficacy of a Smartphone App Designed to Manage Craving and Individual Predictors of Substance Use / Addictive Behavior Among Individuals With Addictive Disorders

Test the Efficacy of a smartphone application designed to manage craving and individual predictors of substance use / addictive behavior among individuals with addictive disorders

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This translational project is the clinical application of research results from the University of Bordeaux, Sanpsy Lab, CNRS USR3413 - on individual predictors of substance use. This project will test the efficacy of a smartphone application to help subjects concerned about reducing or stopping their substance use / behavioral addiction. This new therapeutic tool, designed by University of Bordeaux, Sanpsy Lab, CNRS USR3413 - to manage craving and individual predictors of use, will offer the possibility of an easy to-use and personalized intervention accessible to the greatest number of subjects. Based on our previous results that supports that, for all types of addiction, craving and individual cues are a significant drive for use in people with addiction, the application tested in this study was designed to be used among people presenting various types of addiction (substance and behavioral addictions). The application will also evaluate all concurrent substance uses and addictive behaviors to identify and prevent risk of addiction transfers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

274

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants requesting help for substance or behavioral addiction in one of the participating specialized addiction treatment centers, and with more than 1-month-delay before treatment admission
  • Age >= 18 years of age
  • With at least one substance or behavioral addiction (DSM-5 criteria)
  • Affiliated person or beneficiary of a social security scheme.
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical, psychiatric or addiction condition that warrants immediate treatment intervention
  • Patients with somatic, cognitive or other disorders preventing the use of the device (deafness, impaired vision, illiteracy....)
  • Difficulty in understanding and / or writing French
  • Not familiar with the use of smartphone
  • Individuals participating in another study that includes an ongoing exclusion period
  • Be deprived of liberty due to an ongoing legal procedure
  • Individuals under legal protection
  • Be under guardianship or under curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
participants will receive and use during 4 weeks the full interventional version of the smartphone application (combining EMA + EMI) targeting craving and personal situations at risk for use

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

: ambulatory assessment of behaviors/symptoms in real-time on smartphones

Placebo Comparator: control group
: participants will receive and use a restricted version of the smartphone application (only EMA: 4 electronic questionnaires per day to assess main problematic substance use / addictive behavior) during 4 weeks

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)

: ambulatory assessment of behaviors/symptoms in real-time on smartphones

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The decrease of main problematic substance use / addictive behavior
Time Frame: 4 weeks
We will compare the percentage of participants for whom a 20% decrease in main problematic substance use / addictive behavior was observed between 1st week and 4 th week of smartphone application use in the experimental group versus the control group
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Temporal evolution of craving and substance use/addictive behaviors The evolution and temporal trajectories of craving intensity, substances use/addictive behaviors measured with EMA in daily life
Time Frame: 4 weeks

During the 4 weeks use of the application, all participants will be instructed to complete 4 daily EMA electronic interviews to assess craving-and substance use/addictive behavior (see Serre, Fatseas et al. 2012). At each electronic interview, participants will be asked to rate the maximum level of craving (i.e. the desire to use the main substance/addictive behavior) that they felt since the previous assessment on a seven-point scale (1 no desire to 7 extreme desire), and will also be asked if they had used, since the previous assessment, the main substance/addictive(yes/no)

- The evolution and temporal trajectories of substances use/addictive behaviors measured with EMA in daily life

4 weeks
Impact on subsequent standard treatment at 4-month follow -up
Time Frame: at 4-month follow-up
Impact of the 4 weeks use of the smartphone application Potential impact (positive or negative) of the 4 weeks use of the smartphone application on subsequent treatment will be assessed at 4-month follow-up with rate of first-time attendance to the standard treatment, time to first-time attendance to the standard treatment, compliance with standard treatment (Treatment Service Review), and evolution of severity of addiction during the standard treatment (ASI Composite Score). Follow-ups measures will be compared to baseline measures, and the difference will be compared between the two groups.
at 4-month follow-up
Efficacy of the intervention in reduction on addiction severity (ASI) and craving for primary addiction,
Time Frame: At 1-month and 4-month follow-up

Multifactorial addiction severity ASI "Composite Score" for the main problematic addiction (drug or alcohol or tobacco or behavioral addiction) : Range 0-1 (1: higher severity) and craving self-reported in the last EMA week, and reported in the Craving evaluation scale developed by the University of Bordeaux Addiction Team of the Sanpsy Laboratory will be used. It is an heteroevaluation of craving for all substances and addictive behaviors reported by the subject. This tool explores the frequency of craving, corresponding to the number of days craving was reported during the last 30 days, as well as mean and maximum intensity on a scale ranging from 0 (no craving) to 10 (extreme craving).

Comparison between baseline, 1-month et 4-month follow-ups of frequency, mean and maximum intensity of craving for main problematic addiction

At 1-month and 4-month follow-up
Factors associated with application efficacy among initial addiction severity (ASI), initial craving for primary addiction, type of primary addiction, comorbid psychiatric disorders (MINI), and addiction treatment (ASI and TSR)
Time Frame: inclusion
Evaluation of the initial severity of addiction ASI "Composite Score" for the main problematic addiction (drug or alcohol or tobacco or behavioral addiction) : Range 0-1 (1: higher severity), initial craving frequency and intensity with craving evaluation scale, the type of addiction,comorbid psychiatric disorders (evaluated with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), and past or concomitant addiction treatment (evaluated by ASI and Treatment Service Review).
inclusion
Feasibility of the smartphone application as assessed by use of the app (EMA responses) and drop-out rates
Time Frame: at 1-month
Feasibility will be assessed at the 1-month follow-up by number of days and frequency of use of the application (calculated from EMA responses: number of questionnaires answered on total number of questionnaires proposed by the application), rate of participants not completing the study, and reasons for stopping
at 1-month
Acceptability of the smartphone app assessed by AES, D-WAI and u-MARS
Time Frame: at 1-month
Acceptability will be assessed at 1-month follow-up with AES, D-WAI and uMARS. The Acceptability E-scale (AES) is a 6-item questionnaire that evaluates the extent to which subjects find E-health systems acceptable. Each item is ranked on a 5-point Likert scale, generating a total score of acceptability ranging from 6 (lowest acceptability) to 30 (highest acceptability) (Micoulaud-Franchi, Sauteraud et al. 2016). The Digital Working Alliance Inventory (D-WAI) measures factors (goals, tasks and bond) to examine the therapeutic relationship between the participant and the app (Henson et al., 2019). The user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) is a simple tool that can be reliably used by end-users to assess the quality of mHealth apps (Stoyanov et al., 2016).
at 1-month
Acceptability of the smartphone app assessed by AES, D-WAI and u-MARS
Time Frame: at 1-mont
Intervention Satisfaction will be assessed at 1-month follow-up with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), that is a multi-item measure of satisfaction related to healthcare (Larsen et al., 1979; Kapp et al., 2014). The CSQ-8 total score ranges from 8 to 32. A higher score represents greater satisfaction
at 1-mont

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: MARC AURIACOMBE, MD, Prof, Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Addiction

Clinical Trials on Smartphone application

3
Subscribe