Superior vs Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)

April 10, 2023 updated by: Dr. Catherine Birt, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Randomized Prospective Study of Superior Versus Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)

Basic Study Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blinded study to compare dysphotopsias and pain recollection immediately 2 weeks, and 3 months after LPI in PACS patients who have a clear indication for bilateral LPI. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference in dysphotopsia or pain levels by LPI position. Our alternate hypothesis is that there are more dysphotopsias superiorly and more pain temporally.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The study objective is to describe the difference in the incidence of dysphotopsias and sensation of pain both immediately, 2 weeks and 3 months after superior or temporal LPI. The main primary outcome variable will be the presence of dysphotopsias and the recollection of pain graded by a standardized pain scale.

Stratified Block Randomization: 200 patients will be recruited from participating centre. For each patient, the order of the eye to be treated as well as the position of the LPI superior or temporal will be randomized.

Methods:

Subjects: Patients included in the study will be patients referred for a glaucoma evaluation or in follow up at Sunnybrook Science Center who are diagnosed as PACS and have therefore an indication for bilateral LPIs.

Interventions: All patients eligible will be examined by the principal investigator, including a slit lamp assessment of the anterior segment, gonioscopy of the angle and stereoscopic optic nerve examination with a 78 Diopters lens. Intraocular pressure (IOP) will be measured with applanation tonometry. Patients will be assessed with a macular and optic nerve OCT to rule out glaucoma.

Only bilateral PACS patients will be included. One randomly selected eye will receive superior LPI while contralateral eye temporal LPI. At the 2 week and 3 month follow up visits patients will be asked about dysphotopsias in one or both eyes and their recollection of pain will be graded. Other distractors will be included in the questionnaire such as increased tearing sensation.

Laser peripheral iridotomy will be performed using neo-dynium:yttrium:aluminium-garnet laser after pretreatment with 2% pilocarpine and brimonidine 0.15%. Superior LPIs will be placed between the 11- and 1-o'clock positions such that they were covered completely by the upper eyelid; nasal/temporal LPIs will be placed between the 2- and 4-o'clock positions or the 8- and 10-o'clock positions such that they were completely clear of the lid margin. Preference will be given to iris crypts, avoiding iris vessels when possible. Laser peripheral iridotomies will be performed in both eyes during the same visit and will be confirmed to be patent after the procedure. Intraoperative data collected will include initial per-shot laser energy in milli joules, number of laser shots, and total laser energy in millijoules. All the patients will be treated with fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops QID for 5 days after surgery.

Data Collection: Laser treatment specifications will be noted for the amount in LPI positioning, number of applications, and amount of energy used. Other relevant patient information will also be noted such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, IOP and presence of lens opacities along with the patients gender, age and ethnicity. These patients will be scheduled for follow up examination and IOP measurement at 2 weeks and 3 months after LPI procedure. On follow up a questionnaire will be given to patients assessing pain recollection and presence of dysphotopsias. Lid coverage of the LPI will also be noted.

Sample size and Justification:

The target sample size of 200 participants was selected to provide 80% power on an estimated incidence of 10.7% incidence of dysphotopsias after superior LPI versus 2.4% after temporal LPI with a 2-sided error at α = .05. This was based on the study published by Vera et al,.2014. The sample size allows for a 15% loss to follow-up and a 10% crossover between randomization groups.

Data Analysis: Group differences in baseline variables will be evaluated using Student t test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Recruitment: Patients will be identified on initial or follow up visits at Sunnybrook Health Center. The ophthalmologists will identify potential subjects and the study coordinator will explain the nature of the study and invite them to participate. An Information and Consent Form will be signed by the patient previous to the enrollment in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

* clinical evidence of bilateral occludable angles (PACS) defined as:

  • Peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) absent and trabecular meshwork not visible in ≥6 clock hours under non-indentation gonioscopy, Along with,
  • absence of PAC or PACG, in both eyes.
  • macular and optic nerve OCT within the 95% range of the normative database for patients to be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • evidence of unilateral PACS,
  • a history suggestive of an acute angle closure attack (based on symptoms) documented intraocular pressure over 30 mmHg,
  • or any sign of Angle Closure Glaucoma (manifest glaucomatous neuropathy detected by OCT).
  • Patients with previous ocular surgeries will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Superior LPI placement
Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement superiorly in one eye.
Laser peripheral iridotomy will be performed using neo-dynium:yttrium:aluminium-garnet laser after pretreatment with 2% pilocarpine and brimonidine 0.15%. Superior LPIs will be placed between the 11- and 1-o'clock positions such that they were covered completely by the upper eyelid; nasal/temporal LPIs will be placed between the 2- and 4-o'clock positions or the 8- and 10-o'clock positions such that they were completely clear of the lid margin. Preference will be given to iris crypts, avoiding iris vessels when possible. Laser peripheral iridotomies will be performed in both eyes during the same visit and will be confirmed to be patent after the procedure. Intraoperative data collected will include initial per-shot laser energy in milli joules, number of laser shots, and total laser energy in millijoules. All the patients will be treated with flurometholone 0.1% eye drops QID for 5 days after surgery.
Active Comparator: Temporal LPI placement
Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement temporally in one eye.
Laser peripheral iridotomy will be performed using neo-dynium:yttrium:aluminium-garnet laser after pretreatment with 2% pilocarpine and brimonidine 0.15%. Superior LPIs will be placed between the 11- and 1-o'clock positions such that they were covered completely by the upper eyelid; nasal/temporal LPIs will be placed between the 2- and 4-o'clock positions or the 8- and 10-o'clock positions such that they were completely clear of the lid margin. Preference will be given to iris crypts, avoiding iris vessels when possible. Laser peripheral iridotomies will be performed in both eyes during the same visit and will be confirmed to be patent after the procedure. Intraoperative data collected will include initial per-shot laser energy in milli joules, number of laser shots, and total laser energy in millijoules. All the patients will be treated with flurometholone 0.1% eye drops QID for 5 days after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysphotopsias noted from baseline visit before procedure till 3 months after procedure
Time Frame: 3 months from baseline visit
We will inquire if patients experienced any of the following before and/or after the iridotomy: halo, lines, crescent, ghost image, glare, spots, shadows, blurring, or other unlisted visual disturbances. This will be part of the questionnaire completed before the procedure, at 2 weeks, and at 3 months.
3 months from baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain during the baseline visit procedure and recollection of pain till 3 months after procedure
Time Frame: 3 months from baseline visit
The pain during the procedure and recollection of pain in follow up study visits; (no pain is expected once the procedure is completed) is a secondary outcome, as part of the questionnaire, graded by a standardized pain scale grading the pain from 0 to 10, being 0 no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain). This will be assessed immediately after the procedure, at 2 weeks and at 3 months after their laser peripheral iridotomy has been performed as is the current standard of care.
3 months from baseline visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC, Sunnybrook

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3236_2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Angle Glaucoma Closure Suspect

Clinical Trials on Yag Laser peripheral Iridotomy

3
Subscribe