Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction (PROSPER-HF)

August 17, 2021 updated by: Jin-Oh Choi, Samsung Medical Center

Prospective Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan on the Outcome of Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: a Pilot Study

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disease with weakened heart muscles or abnormal pressure within the heart chambers result in breathlessness, leg edema, or fatigue. A subclass of HF shows reduced heart muscle contractility, which is represented by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker, a major drug class for heart failure. Sacubitril/valsartan is a combination of 2 drugs, classified as a new class of drug called angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). Although these medications are both first-line treatment in HF with reduced LVEF, recent guidelines encourage the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with ongoing symptoms. After successful treatment, some patients experience recovery of LVEF. In these patients, otherwise called heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF), it is not clear whether continued treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan is beneficial in terms of relapse of heart failure or worsening of LVEF. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine whether the treatment with sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan differs in clinical outcomes after 1 year in HFiEF patients by observing the change in blood test markers of heart failure (N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide; NT-proBNP) and aggravation of HF defined as reduced LVEF, congestive symptoms, hospitalization or death from HF.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

1. Background and study purpose Heart failure (HF) is caused by structural or functional abnormality of the myocardium or elevated intracardiac pressures, resulting in symptoms and signs of low cardiac output or congestion, such as dyspnea, peripheral edema, elevated jugular venous pressures, pulmonary congestion, and fatigue. HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) is defined as an LVEF <40% by the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Recent guidelines recommend the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), beta blockers (BB), aldosterone antagonists (AA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in HFrEF patients. ACEI/ARB/ARNI, collectively known as renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) blockers, are considered the most important drug class in the treatment for HFrEF and recently, ARNI is increasingly preferred as the first-choice drug. Unlike for initial treatment of HFrEF, continued treatment for patients who experience recovery of LVEF is not as well established. In these patients, called heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF), it is not clear whether continued treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan is beneficial in terms of relapse of heart failure or worsening of LVEF. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine whether the treatment with sacubitril/valsartan versus valsartan differs in clinical outcomes after 1 year in HFiEF patients by observing the change in serum N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and clinical relapse of HF.

2. Registry factors

  1. Source data verification will be done by comparing the data to electronic medical records and paper and electronic case report forms.
  2. Data dictionary with detailed description of each variables are given.
  3. Sample size assessment was calculated by comparing mean NT-proBNP levels at baseline and after 12 months in the two groups by two-sample t-test (two-sided, effect size=0.6, type I error=0.05, type II error=0.8, allocation ratio=1). With a drop-out rate of 10%, 50 patients in each group are needed. As the change of NT-proBNP in HFiEF with sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan has rarely been reported, estimation from the TRED-HF study (Lancet. 2019 Jan 5; 393(10166):61) was used as reference for effect size. This reference was a small study of 25 patients in each group. Therefore, the effect size used for calculation was modified to 0.6 rather than 0.8 by intuition of the investigators.
  4. Plan for missing data: To avoid unavailable data, clinical visits will be monitored and calls will be made for missed appointments. Uninterpretable or out-of-range results will be discussed by participating investigators through regular meetings.
  5. Statistical analysis Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome (NT-proBNP changes) will be log-transformed and compared by paired t-tests. Baseline characteristics will be presented according to initial drug assignment and compared with the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Data are presented as median and IQR or as n (%). Occurrence of the secondary endpoint will be graphically displayed per group with Kaplan-Meier survival plots and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models will be used to investigate predictors of worsening NT-proBNP levels or occurrence of clinical adverse events in patients of each group. A p value less than 0.05 will be considered significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Consecutive participant sampling was done for all eligible patients.
  2. Patients visiting a specialized heart failure clinic at one of the top tertiary level hospitals in Seoul, Korea. Patients have a nationwide distribution geographically, and show a wide range of clinical presentations.

Description

Inclusion Criteria: (AND)

  • Patient with a history of HF with reduced EF (HFrEF; LVEF <40 percent) and received treatment with sacubitril/valsartan for at least 3 months, after which showing improvement of LVEF to >40 percent and symptoms of NYHA functional class I or II
  • serum NT-proBNP levels < 400 pg/dL for sinus rhythm and < 600pg/dL for atrial fibrillation
  • Patients on stable doses of diuretics for 1 week

Exclusion Criteria: (OR)

  • History of hospitalization for heart failure within 30 days before enrollment
  • History of acute coronary syndrome (acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina), percutaneous coronary artery intervention or cardiac surgery within 30 days before enrollment
  • History of cardiac resynchronization therapy within 90 days before screening
  • Planned percutaneous or surgical coronary artery revascularization, or major cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass, valvuloplasty, mechanical cardiac support or heart transplantation) within 90 days after enrollment
  • Contraindicated or has history of hypersensitivity to RAS blockers including ACEI or ARB
  • Use of inotropes
  • Survival estimate < 3months
  • Otherwise deemed as inappropriate by the attending physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Sacubitril/valsartan
Patients undergoing continued treatment with sacubitril/valsartan after improvement of LVEF >40% with > 3 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Dose and titration schedule will be individualized by discretion of the attending physician.
Participants will receive individualized dosage and titration as part of routine medical care, and a the effect will be studied for at least 12 months. The investigator does not assign specific interventions to the study participants.
Other Names:
  • Entresto
Valsartan
Patients undergoing continued treatment with valsartan after improvement of LVEF >40% with > 3 months of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Dose and titration schedule will be individualized by discretion of the attending physician.
Participants will receive individualized dosage and titration as part of routine medical care, and a the effect will be studied for at least 12 months. The investigator does not assign specific interventions to the study participants.
Other Names:
  • Diovan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in NT-proBNP concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
pg/ml
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart failure relapse
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months

One or more of the following:

  1. LVEF <40 percent by cardiac imaging including but not refined to: echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
  2. symptomatic congestive heart failure: symptoms and signs of heart failure such as dyspnea, edema, abdominal fullness, and fatigue
6 months and 12 months
Hospitalization for heart failure (HHF)
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure
6 months and 12 months
Death caused by heart failure
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
Heart failure being either the immediate or contributing cause of death.
6 months and 12 months
Mortality
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months
All-cause mortality
6 months and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF, percent)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

measurement based on echocardiography with the following priority

  1. Modified Simpson's method
  2. Visual estimation by a qualified echocardiography specialist
  3. M-mode
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD, mm)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

measurement based on echocardiography with the following priority

  1. M-mode from parasternal long-axis view
  2. 2-d caliper from parasternal long-axis view
  3. M-mode from parasternal short-axis view
  4. 2-d caliper from parasternal short-axis view
  5. 2-d caliper from any other view
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD, mm)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

measurement based on echocardiography with the following priority

  1. M-mode from parasternal long-axis view
  2. 2-d caliper from parasternal long-axis view
  3. M-mode from parasternal short-axis view
  4. 2-d caliper from parasternal short-axis view
  5. 2-d caliper from any other view
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
LV mass index (LVMI; g/m^2)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

Calculated by the following measurements based on echocardiography.

Equation: LVMI = LV mass / BSA

  • {(0.8 * [1.04 * ((LVEDD + IVSd + PWd)^3 - LVEDD^3)]) + 0.6} / BSA

IVSd: Interventricular septum dimension (mm)* PWd: LV Posterior wall dimension (mm)* BSA: body surface area (kg/m^2) calculated from weight (kg) and height (m) at the timing of echocardiography (BSA = weight/ (height)^2

* LVEDD, IVSd, PWd are measured with the following priority

  1. M-mode from parasternal long-axis view
  2. 2-d caliper from parasternal long-axis view
  3. M-mode from parasternal short-axis view
  4. 2-d caliper from parasternal short-axis view
  5. 2-d caliper from any other view
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
Left atrial volume index (LAVI, ml/m^2)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

LAVI = LA volume (ml) /BSA (m^2)

  1. LA volume is measured by the biplane area-length method in the apical 4-chamber and apical 2-chamber view as described in:

    (Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008 May;9(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jul 23.) LA volume = (0.85 × A1 × A2)/(L1 -L2 /2).

  2. BSA: body surface area (kg/m^2) calculated from weight (kg) and height (m) at the timing of echocardiography (BSA = weight/ (height)^2
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
E/E' ratio
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
measurements based on echocardiography E: by pulsed wave Doppler of mitral inflow velocity E': by tissue Doppler of early diastolic mitral annulus velocity
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP, mmHg)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) estimated by Tricuspid valve Regurgitation jet maximum velocity (TR Vmax) base on continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements.

Modified Bernoulli equation: RVSP = 4V^2 + RA pressure(*)

* RA pressure (mmHg) is estimated by the following:

  1. RAP=5 when inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter =< 2.1cm and abscent plethora
  2. RAP=10 when IVC =< 2.1cm and present plethora
  3. RAP=10 when IVC > 2.1cm and abscent plethora
  4. RAP=15 when IVC > 2.1cm and present plethora.
6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
LV 4-dimensional strain (percent)
Time Frame: 6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months

Using a Vivid E9, E90, E95 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with a 2.5-3.6 MHz 4-dimensional Volume transducer, a 4D full-volume scan is obtained from the apical position during an end-expiratory apnea. From a twelve-slice display mode, the examiner ensures that the whole LV structure be included in the 4D full-volume image. The frame rate was required to be over 40 percent of the heart rate (HR). The global strain values, including LV GLS, GRS, GCS, and GAS, were automatically calculated by the software. Specific techniques are described in (Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Jan;12(1):26-32. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq095. Epub 2010 Aug 24.)

* GLS = global longitudinal strain; GRS = global radial strain; GCS = global circumferential strain; GAS = global area strain;

6 months (optional, personalized) and 12 months
Change in hemoglobin (g/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in albumin (g/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in total bilirubin (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in creatinine (mg/dL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in estimated GFR (ml/min/1.73m^2)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Changes in laboratory values between time periods Calculated by CKD-EPI equation

CKD-EPI eGFR(mL/min/1.73m^2) = A × (Scr/B)^C × 0.993^(age) , where A, B, and C are the following:

Female Scr ≤0.7; A = 144, B = 0.7, C = -0.329 Scr ≤0.9; A = 141, B = 0.9, C = -0.411

Male Scr >0.7; A = 144, B = 0.7, C = -1.209 Scr >0.9; A = 141, B = 0.9, C = -1.209

Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in sodium (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in potassium (mmol/L)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Change in hemoglobin A1c (percent)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Changes in laboratory values between time periods
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Reason for discontinuation of study drug
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months

Choose one answer from the following:

  1. cardiogenic shock: persistent hypotension (SBP<90mmHg or MAP drop 30mmHg) with cardiac index < 1.8L/min/m2 without support (< 2.2 with support)
  2. noncardiogenic shock: persistent hypotension and inadequate tissue perfusion(*) excluding cardiac origin
  3. drug intolerance - 'orthostatic hypotension' or 'others'
  4. renal dysfunction (**)
  5. switch to other RAS blocker - specify reason in free text
  6. decision for other advanced cardiac treatment: left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation.
  7. others (free text)

[*] Shock as defined in (N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1726-1734). [**] Renal dysfunction defined as:

  1. Acute kidney injury (AKI) by KDIGO (Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(Suppl 1):8.)
  2. Progression of CKD defined as: sustained reduction in eGFR by 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (or CKD stage change), or to <10 mL/min/1.73 m2 (or initiation of dialysis).
6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

The access criteria has not been discussed yet.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure, Systolic

Clinical Trials on Sacubitril-Valsartan

3
Subscribe