Efficacy of Electrical Dry Needling in Pain, Sensitivity, Functionality and Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

November 26, 2021 updated by: Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, Universidad de Almeria

Comparison of the Efficacy of Electrical Dry Needling Versus Traditional Physical Therapy in the Treatment of Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Pain, Sensitivity, Functionality and Quality of Life of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of electrical dry needling versus ischemic compression, analytical stretching and postural habits educational dossier in active myofascial trigger points in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A double-blind clinical trial will be developed in a sample of 80 subjects with chronic low back pain. Patients in the experimental group will receive electrical dry needling at the active myofascial trigger points (PGM) of the quadratus lumbar, multifidus, and iliocostal muscles (following the PGM maps described by Travell and Simons). The technique will be performed using needle electrodes, the generated current will be produced by a TENS device with a frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 250 μs, during 30 min of application. The therapeutic intervention will be 1 weekly session for a total of 6 weeks.

The control group will perform an ischemic compression technique in active PGM with a time between 20 seconds and 1 minute until pain inhibition is achieved, and finally, analytical stretching will be carried out on the quadratus lumbar, multifidus and iliocostal muscles. The treatment will consist of 1 weekly session for 6 weeks, in addition they will be provided with a training dossier on postural education in their activities of daily life.

A baseline assessment of the primary and secondary outcome measures will be carried out before randomization of the participants to the different groups, an immediate post-treatment assessment (1 day after the last intervention) and an assessment two month after the end of the intervention ( short-term follow-up).

The objectives of this study are to compare the repercussions of dry electropuncture versus ischemic compression in active PGM plus stretching in terms of pain, functionality, mobility of the spine, and quality of life in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain; and analyze the impact on active myofascial trigger points in terms of pressure tolerance threshold.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Almería, Spain, 04120
        • Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 67 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain ≥ 3 months.
  • Age between 30 and 67 years old.
  • Not being receiving physical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of lumbar stenosis.
  • Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis.
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia.
  • Treatment with corticosteroids or oral medication in recent weeks.
  • History of spine surgery.
  • Contraindication of analgesic electrical therapy.
  • Have previously received a treatment of electrical analgesia or exercise.
  • Central or peripheral nervous system disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Electrical dry needling
The experimental group consisting of 40 subjects will perform electrostimulation on the active myofascial trigger points of the following muscles: quadratus lumbar, multifidus and iliocostalis, following the PGM maps described by Travell and Simons. The electrostimulation of the PGM will be carried out using needle electrodes, the generated current will be produced by a TENS device with a frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 250 μs, the application will be approximately 30 min. The therapeutic intervention will be 1 session per week for a total of 6 weeks.
The control group G2, formed by 40 subjects, will perform an ischemic compression technique in active PGM with a time between 20 seconds and 1 minute until pain inhibition is achieved, and finally, analytical stretching will be carried out on the quadratus lumbar, multifidus and iliocostal muscles, 1 weekly session for 6 weeks, in addition to providing them with a training dossier on postural education in their activities of daily life.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Ischemic compression, analytical stretching and postural habits educational dossier
The control group consisting of 40 subjects will undergo an ischemic compression technique in active PGM with a time between 20 seconds and 1 minute until pain inhibition is achieved, and finally, analytical stretching will be carried out on the quadratus lumbar, multifid and iliocostal, 1 weekly session for 6 weeks providing a training dossier of postural education in their activities of daily life.
The experimental group consisting of 40 subjects will perform electrostimulation on the active myofascial trigger points of the following muscles: quadratus lumbar, multifidus and iliocostalis. The electrostimulation of the PGM will be carried out using needle electrodes, the generated current will be produced by a TENS device with a frequency of 2 Hz and a pulse width of 250 μs, the application will be approximately 30 min. The therapeutic intervention will be 1 session per week for a total of 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pressure pain threshold by Wagner manual pressure algometer.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Apply the tip of the algometer perpendicular to the muscle and maintain a pressure, which will gradually increase to 1 kg / sec. Subjects will be instructed to signal the moment they experience pain, in order to have an accurate record (pain threshold).
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from baseline in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
This is a self-reported questionnaire consisting in 24 items reflecting limitations in different activities of daily living attributed to low back pain including walking, vending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care and daily activities.Ranging from 0 points- better to 24 points- worse disability
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pressure pain threshold by Wagner manual pressure algometer.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Apply the tip of the algometer perpendicular to the muscle and maintain a pressure, which will gradually increase to 1 kg / sec. Subjects will be instructed to signal the moment they experience pain, in order to have an accurate record (pain threshold).
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from baselina in range of motion
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
This variable is quantified using the SpinalMouse ® device (Phisiotech, Spain). It is an electronic computer-aided measuring device that measures sagittal spinal amplitude of movement (ROM) and intersegmental angles in a non-invasive way.
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from baseline in lumbar mobility flexion.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
For the quantification of lumbar flexion an angular inclinometer is used (Fleximeter UM 8320-3 RJ Code Research Institute, Brazil).
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK).Change from baseline in Fear of Movement.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Is a 17-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury.Patient rate beliefs about their pain on a 4-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree (ranging from 17-68 points).
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
SF-36 Health Questionnaire (SF-36).Change from baseline on Quality of Life.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
The SF-36 quality of life questionnaire assesses 8 domains including physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. This scale ranges from 0 (lowest level of functioning) to 100 (highest level)
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from Mcquade Test.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
It measures the isometric endurance of trunk flexion muscles.
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from insomnia Severity Index Índice de calidad de sueño de Pittsburgh.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
This questionnaire consists of 24 questions. The total score can range from 0 to 21 points. The higher the total score, the worse the quality of sleep.
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from baseline in disability. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Idex.
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each ítem has a puntuation fron 0 to 5 points.The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
Change from baseline in pain intensity. Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months
A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain. Range from no pain 0 to maximum pain 10 points
At baseline, at 6 weeks and at 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 17, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 17, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low-back Pain

Clinical Trials on Ischemic compression, analytical stretching and postural habits educational dossier

3
Subscribe